Gay marrige, seems strange to us but to the gays its normal. why shouldn't it be its a life dicission just like eating apound of choclate each say or having moderations of fruit and vegitables. we try to force being stright on americans and say its a sin but i dissagree. People say it is a sickness and just because the bible says that its a sin and its wrong that it atomatically is. Voice your opinion and help me undersatn why they dont get the same rights as everyone else didn't we do this with other races thus racist! Its the same descrimination and its wrong. this could lead to somthing bigger like onother holocaust ( i doubt it but could be true) i just find it appoling!!

I'm not asking if it should have been somewhere else, I'm asking if you thnk they made the right choice in moving the prisoners.

If you change the definition of the word marriage to be "a civil union between two consenting adults" then there won't be a word to specify a heterosexual marriage. 

For example, if some one said to you "I know this married couple, Amari and Jaidyn, who...."
and we were to use the current definition for the word marriage, then you would know that one of those people is male and the other female (although you may not be able to decide which is which).  If we used a "generic" definition then we would have no idea if they were one of each, two males or two females.

In other words, words should convey meaning.  Otherwise, what's the point of using language?  The purpose of language is to clarify, not obfuscate.  Otherwise, lets do away with half the words in the English language.  We can combine the words that kind of have nearly the same meaning into one word.  If that sounds like a crazy idea to you, then you are begining to understand that my stance against using the word "marriage" for gay unions has nothing to do with being a bigot.

Homeland security is a necessity given global terrorist networks.

Abortion is...., not so much a necessity as it is a choice.  Which is why the group supporting abortions is called Pro-Choice not Pro-Necessity ;)

I'm willing to make an exception for rape and incest victims.  I'm also willing tomake an exception if the mother's health is at stake.  But I am not willing to make any exceptions for a woman who is trying to rid herself of her responsibilities.

Gambling is also a choice.  Which is why if you gamble and you lose, the government (i.e., the tax payer) is not responsible for covering your loses.  If you gamble that you will not get pregnant and you have sexual intercourse (instead of some other form of sexual activity) and you lose (i.e., you get pregnant) then the government (i.e., the tax payer) is not responsible for covering your loss (i.e., your abortion).

A woman has a right to an abortion, if she can afford it.

A woman does not have a right to force anyone else to pay for her abortion.

I have the right of freedom of speech.  Would you like to be forced to pay in order for me to excercise my right?

Modern western society is too focused on feelings and emotions and happiness?

Here are 2 possible definitions.  If there are more/others I'll move this to a popularity contest.

Definition:

1.  It means that the government cannot place any obstacles that prevent you from exercising your constitutional right (for example, throwing you in jail for exercising your constitutional right).

2.  It means that the government will pay you to exercise your constitutional right (for example, pay you to get an abortion if you can't afford one ).

Do you think that being a child is more fun? or do you think that being a adult is more fun?

over the past few months the big debate besides the health care  debate is the afghanistan debate.  he has spent many months deliberating on whether or not he should send in the troops or pull them out.  what do you think he should do

President Barrack Obama made a lot of promises to US citizens, but will he stay faithful to those promises and fulfill them in his time in office?

Throughout obamas presidency he has done some contrivertial and well debated "things" like bills and that stuff.  has he helped the US.  has he hurt the US.  what has he done good, What has he done bad?

Our country is in trillions of dollars of dept and people seem to be split on what to do about it.  some people believe raising taxes will get us out of dept.  Some believe lowering taxes will stimulate the economy and get us out of dept.

feel free to come up with different options.