Obviously I'm having infinitely far more fun than atheists for more than 1 reason.1) They are at core angry against God so they really can't be happy, they can only fake it.2) They are fools, and it's much to easy to show how foolish it is to believe as a sinner that you have the right to exist outside of Hell and don't need God the Savior who died to save you from Hell by paying your price with His own blood.3)Judgement day is coming and then nobody will be mocking anybody because there won't be any playing around on that day when Jesus Christ judges all the secrets of men according to His Word
From the language of the Bill:"An affirmative consent standard in the determination of whether consent
was given by both parties to sexual activity. “Affirmative consent”
means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in
sexual activity. It is the responsibility of each person involved in the
sexual activity to ensure that he or she has the affirmative consent of
the other or others to engage in the sexual activity. Lack of protest
or resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent.
Affirmative consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual activity and can
be revoked at any time. The existence of a dating relationship
between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations
between them, should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of
To thank God for some action may discredit the work and selflessness of someone else.If you get into a car accident, don't thank God you didn't die from the impact, that credit goes to the car's designers. When the police and fire trucks arrive, don't thank God for their rescue, the servicemen are the ones who are sacrificing to save you. When the doctors stabilize you and get you on to a speedy recovery, again, do not thank God; thank centuries of medical advancement and progress administered by the hospital staff that helped you through.To thank God is to tell everyone else that they were inconsequential,it's to reduce them to a means to an end,it's removing their agency,and worst of all,it's egregiously selfish.
But if the LORD make a new thing, and the earth open her mouth, and swallow them up, with all that appertain unto them, and they go down quick into the pit; then ye shall understand that these men have provoked the LORD.
Seriously, if your truth is beyond question, whether it be from God or your political position or your fields of study, then for absolutely any question the opponent may ask you should have a reasonable reply to make. Banning them and walking away proves the opposite -- that you don't have the answer. And saying replying is a waste of time is already irrelevant, because you chose to launch a debate on a debate website, you already chose to waste your time on the web.
I am told regularly that I have no right to live outside of Hell. As an atheist I have lived my entire life outside of Hell and will remain outside of Hell, FOREVER. I would argue that religious zealots live in a Hell that they create in their imagination that they only escape from after their brains stops functioning. It's just sad that they feel everyone else should live in this same Hell
Are you for or against gay couples/marriage or the LGBT community? If so, why? Please try to keep it clean. Personally, I am for it but don't worry about my opinion, I want to hear yours. And please no hating against straights or gays.
I will use bold letters to denote vectors and ordinary font for scalars.Hubble's law states that the velocity V of an astronomic object is a function of it's position relative to Earth:V = HR ,where R is the radius-vector (vector which points to the object).If Earth is not the center of the universe, then the same relation should hold for every other possible refference point.Let's say we have two stellar objects M1 and M2, whos radius-vectors are R1 and R2 and velocities are V1 and V2 respectfully.Hubble's law states that V1=HR1 and V2 = HR2For simplicity's sake, let's assume that M1 and M2 are moving in opposite directions away from Earth, and are the same distance away. So their velocities are directed along the same axis.So, using projections on that axis, V1=HR1 and V2 = -HR1.What is the velocity V of M2 in the refference frame of M1?Relativistic formula for velocity transformation gives: V = (V1-V2)/(1+(V1V2/c^2))Using values for V1 and V2 from Hubble's law, we get: V = 2HR/(1+R^2(H^2/c^2))*If* Hubble's law was universal, then instead of that we should have V = 2HRThis means that Hubble's law is impossible in flat Minkovsky space-time.Only general relativity models could have a chance to account for it, but so far no mathematically sound models have been presented. Friedmann - Lemaitre metric is only valid for empty or unifromly filled space, and we're dealing with a universe which has a lot of distinct objects.
The justification for why God exists usually is based on everything had to come from somewhere. And when anyone proposes any answer other than God it gets dismissed as inferior to the God explanation. But then where did God come from? And before you say simply he always was, realize the cyclical reasoning at play there. Something else could not have have existed forever, but yes God could. Could there not be a creator of God(s)? Could there not be a time or place or alternate reality where some sort of megaGod made the God you know? Why does this anomaly of God's origin get a free pass on explanation?
Burn marks on toast, condensation on windows, deformations on trees, may be interpreted by the religious as images of Mary or Jesus and may inspire visitors and pilgrimages by those who call them miracles. Are they?