Why do these guys buy assault rifles? Do they think there's a zombie apocalypse on the way? Do they watch too much tv and start to believe it's real?Why are they so terrified that they need assault weapons to feel safe?Is it simply cowardice or is there some deeper mental derangement behind it?
It's been a long while since we've had any good, stirring debates on here, since most of the new debates are just crap about other users. Why can't we just stop talking about Nomenclature or excon or Brontoraptor or anybody?
Should debates be ‘cleaned’ and have bad words and negative ideas removed for you or should people be free to say what they want, regardless of the content, and let people choose to block certain people entirely?
They are terrified of cross-examination. They know their worldview is irrational, ignorant and based on mental illness. This is why when you ask them a direct question about it, they immediately try to change the subject. They know in a real debate with cross-examination, they would look like the fools God says they are.
The citizens of the United States get to say through their elected representatives what the nation’s immigration laws will be.The citizens get to demand of those employed by that government that such laws be predictably, consistently and properly enforced.But how is a citizenry deciding who it lets into its country any different from an individual of that citizenry deciding who is admitted into his or her home?To further the point you come home from work one day to find that another family has just up and moved in and when you call the police they refuse to evict your new roommates citing a policy that the mayor unilaterally decided upon laws to the contrary and requiring you to just live with and accept whomever it is that moves into your house.Let that happen in your house and your neighbor’s house and everywhere up and down your block and it would be called Chaos.Which is exactly what engulfs U.S. immigration policy at this very moment !
Best Comedians: Current & PastWho do you think the best comedians are, from our time period or previously?State one or multiple comedians that one views as superior, and provide reasons for the selection(s) as well as a sample 'bit', if desired
Trump’s own National Security Adviser Says Proof of Russian Election Meddling Is ‘Incontrovertible’http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/02/mcmaster-proof-of-russian-meddling-incontrovertible.html
You are all fools, and I have deceived you...I was Nomenclature the whole time, FactMachine, PeterJoseph, Daegonius. It was me the whole time....hehe...hehehuhooooooo........NYEEEEEEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
What would the Left say if the Right voted for a KKK member?
We all know what they would say. They would say that those who voted for a KKK member were racists, and guess what? The Left would be correct.If those who voted for a KKK member said they were not a one issue voter and agreed with the politician's other positions, what would the Left say? They would say it would be ludicrous to ignore such an important issue as racism because it speaks to the politician's humanity.I agree and is why I laugh every time a Democrat who says he is personally pro life, votes for this radical pro abortion Democrat Party.These supposedly pro life Democrats look the other way when voting for politicians who keep No Restriction abortions legal!They are phonies and the lives of even viable babies means nothing to them. They tell us they are not one issue voters and that they agree with the Democrat Party on other issues! The issue of abortion speaks to the humanity of these politicians, just as being a KKK member speaks to the humanity of that politician.Why will you not give a person any credibility of not personally being a racist, when he votes for a KKK member?Is there an honest Democrat on this site willing to admit their hypocrisy, and willing to admit how the lives of these unborn children actually means nothing to them?Stop being such phonies because you are not fooling anyone.-FromWithin
On April 28, 1996, a gunman opened fire on tourists in a seaside resort in Port Arthur, Tasmania. By the time he was finished, he had killed 35 people and wounded 23 more. It was the worst mass murder in Australia’s history.Twelve days later, Australia’s government did something remarkable. Led by newly elected conservative Prime Minister John Howard, it announced a bipartisan deal with state and local governments to enact sweeping gun-control measures. Two decades hence, the results of these policy changes are clear: They worked really, really well.https://www.slate.com/blogs/crime/2012/12/16/gun_control_after_connecticut_shooting_could_australia_s_laws_provide_a.html