By the way, I like the site updates  And interpret the question anyway you feel like, you know... deep think it and such 

Note: Can't be bacteria

This is old news already but whatever. Basically a guy shot and killed a Canadian soldier who was on ceremonial sentry duty, then the guy went and attacked parliament buildings. Your thoughts? Link to Wikipedia Article

Google Web Definitions:  Valid - (of an argument or point) having a sound basis in logic or fact; reasonable or cogent.

  “What can be done to curb the human population growth in order to prevent the world's population from exceeding the carrying capacity of the planet?”

Wikipedia Link

Link to video if embed doesn't work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odgldsDVDis WARNING: GRAPHIC VIDEO AHEAD

"If it is too heavy to carry, it is a burden. If it is easily replaceable, it is not worth saving" Note: I am talking about the "modern" day nomad. A.K.A a person who has no permenant residence and very few belongings.   

Some say that if rich countries stopped giving to poor countries, that those poor countries would start helping themselves. What do you think?

http://www.ocfoundation.org/hoarding/legal_issues.aspx http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/consumer/behavioral-health/hoarding/when-hoarding-changes-from-a-personal-to-a.html http://livingstingy.blogspot.ca/2011/03/if-friend-family-member-has-hoarding.html  

I've noticed that many Christians, when confronted with the immoral material in the Bible (particularely the material in the old testament), they exclaim that the old testament is "the laws of the old land" and that only Jews follow the old testament. Are they not basically saying that Jews are immoral?

What is it that makes you understand your god so well? Is that you read the Bible? Is it that you can "feel" your god's presence inside of yourself?  

Assuming that a universal language was created which caused cultural languages to become archaic and forgotten, would the benefit of having a common global language outweigh the loss of other languages?

This is assuming that a sentient AI (artificial intelligence) has been discovered. 

You are at war. Deciphering an intercepted code, you learn two things about your enemy; a single spot in their defence will be at its weakest in ten days, and they will attack one of your cities in five days.   What do you do with this information? Do you evacuate your people from the city (saving thousands), or do you prepare your forces to attack in ten days (winning the war)?

Basically, what makes something right or wrong and how do you justify it? How do you decide what action to take in a moral dilemma? Note: I am looking for non-religious responses.