The left is fretting about ex-military leaders in Trump's cabinet. With regard for the concerns of our founders, and the history of rogue military leaders, I do not see a reasonable concern over the potential for military control over the military. Trump is commander and chief. He is most certainly not of a military background. These men are not a threat to our sacred union, so chill out
Frail Democrat Feminists chopping hair to cope with Trump win
Crazy Democrats are on the very verge on losing what little gray matter they have left !According to a report from New York Magazine, females in the D.C. area have resorted to chopping off their hair and reaching for black hair dye to cope with the new reality of a Donald Trump presidency. Some feminists say their new 'dos show their "autonomy" in uncertain times while others hilariously think their rushed hair change is an act of defiance"sending a message to the Trump presidency.” A self-described "minority in every way possible," Vegan chef Mya Zeronis, explained that she "clipper-cut" her hair in November "to send a message to the Trump presidency." "Literally without thinking, I grabbed the Natural Black box by Garnier,” explained Hillary supporter Juilanna Evens. "I was like, f** it! The election deadened my soul. I think I wanted to do something defiant to feel stronger."How about refusing to shave their legs or under arms is that next for the feminists ? When Democrats feel out of control they turn to something they can control their hair. So it all makes sense in the world of Democrat delusion !
CD is full of attackers and haters not wanting to debate?
Personally after looking at a few debates and arguments a lot of people on this site dont know what they are talking about and using opinions instead of facts or arguments. In addition, people resort to caps and profanity to prove they are correct. Furthermore, there are so many ad hominum attacks its not even funny any more... CD members need to actually debate instead of attacking one another.
Left-wing CNN Democrat Fareed (GPS) Zakaria joined President Barack Obama in describing opposition to the Affordable Care and Patient Protection Act (ACA) as partly motivated by anti-black racism directed towards the first black president. The documentary hosted by Fareed (GPS) Zakaria for which opposition to the ACA, and Obama more broadly, is cast as being grounded in anti-black racism and racial resentment directed towards the first black president. Then O'Stupid chimes in with this and i quote " “I think there’s a reason why attitudes about my presidency among whites in northern states are very different from whites in southern states. So, you know, are there folks whose primary concern about me has been that I seem foreign, the other? Are those who champion the birther movement, you know, feeding off of bias? Absolutely.”Barack Obama and the Democrat Party will never drop the "Race Card" only card they have in their deck. To bad they don't have the ability to understand that wore out 'Blame Game" just isn't working anymore with the American voters.
So Ive been waiting for a cool new iphone release since the iphone 5s.. it just hasnt happened yet. Same with MacBooks, Im using my old slow one from 2011 just so I can go buy a new fucking awesome one but its just not happening. The next iphone will be the 10th (or is it the 10th anniversary? Either way) certain fanboys are expecting it to be a big deal and would also explain why the iphone 7 was such a total bust.So Im waiting to buy a new one, but if Apple blows it again Im switching to Samsung for sure. Ive wanted to buy that cool edge one for so long!!!But what do you guys think? Were you always Apple critics, Apple fanboys or maybe Lovers like me who just cant seem to feel the spark anymore?
when viewing someones profile i see areas for Allies, Enemies, and Hostiles .what do these areas mean, exactly ?in some cases i may disagree with someone strongly and yet welcome their input on debates .but in other cases i could conceivably agree with someone on the issues but not like their presence in a debate because of their arguments or how they treat people .
In pushing the Marxist vision of economic determinism Obama refused to identify cultural, religious, or social drivers of Islamic terrorism. Islamic terrorism could be prevented through international redistribution of wealth to promote economic development in poorer societies, said Obama. "Similarly, any long-term strategy to reduce the threat of terrorism depends on investments that strengthen some of these fragile societies. Our generals, our commanders understand this. This is not charity. It’s fundamental to our national security. A dollar spent on development is worth a lot more than a dollar spent fighting a war.So to Barack Obama international redistribution of wealth is not a charity ! Obama speaks to no one but himself any more. The man is mentally deranged driven crazy by his twisted ideology which as we can all see has decimated the Democrat party !
Instig8or can just hack the site, delete whatever posts he wants and the real site owner doesn't seem to care? LOL! It does kind of make it all fun though, CreateDebate.com is like the wild west of the internet, anything goes!
So, here's the concept of every superhero vigilante story ever. Our hero is a normal person, possibly even just a kid pr young man without parents or some guy (stereotypically male, but not always male), who isn't exactly in the best physical shape. The city he lives in is run with crime. He is lost in the woods or is in the city but found by some person who is so good at fighting that they can beat the police, even if they are armed with guns, without having to have a gun themselves. There are many ways this can happen. Our future hero goes through a lot, but is simply not getting his training from the military or police force. A bad guy comes out who the police can't do anything about cuz he and his fellow thugs are somehow able to defeat all police, etc. and the city goes into chaos as people are killed. But our unlikely hero develops fighting skill from some mystical source (not really mystical but mystical in the sense that the audience is just supposed to accept that they can make our hero about to fight this bad guy), and eventually finds his way back to town just in time to save everyone. He appears just in the nick of time to fight the bad guy in a hood and mask, etc....
In real life, someone did the math and showed anyone who did this in real life would just get shot with a shot gun. Some say it would have to be something like the punisher, with his military training, or something similar, and even then it wouldn't last very long and would probably get shot in a couple of months. Another person who claimed to do the math said to get around this would require $6 million and 12 years of training to be a real life superhero vigilante who is above the law. Some argue that Anonymous loosely fits this description.
Can anyone with any martial arts training, hacking, or whatever, possibly become above the police and defeat criminals. What if the criminals aren't above the law, is it possible then? If you think it is possible, explain how. If you think it is not possible, explain why not. How far could this go in real life?
Obviously it won't happen with something like TKD training or Karate, but if you disagree please explain how. In my view, the person would have to have Krav Maga, Systems, Keysi Fighting Method, Jeet Kun Do, etc. among other military level combative arts, and they'd have to know at least five of such arts and probably would have to include Ninjutsu, computer hacking, etc. among other things. How unrealistic is this? Do you think it really requires all of this?
There are vigilantes in real life, but they aren't able to fight tons of criminals in their own, they travel in groups with guns to try and outnumber bad guys in terms in having more guns aimed at once, in areas of the world where crime runs rampant. This is not the same is being Batman in my view.
So what do you think, possible or no?
The contemporary social critic Neil Postman contrasts George Orwell's vision of the future, as expressed in the novel 1984, with that of Aldous Huxley in the novel Brave New World. Orwell fears what we hate will ruin us and important aspects of life will be banned, while Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us and important aspects of life will simply be forgotten. Consider Postman's assertion that Huxley's vision is more relevant today that Orwell's, decide if you would defend, challenge, or qualify this argument.