Ang mga paraan ng pamamalakad/pamamahala ng mga Espanyol sa Pilipinas.

Hitchens Razor: That which can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

An economic issue related to the topic Kakapusan, Kakulangan at Alokasyon.

There is division in the scientific community as to whether global warming is a result of human action or whether it is part of Earth's natural climatic cycle.  Is global warming part of Earth's cycle of warming and freezing or is use of fossil fuels etc the cause?

You are a Christian. You love Jesus. If you could go back in time and save him, would you? To stop him from incredible torture? Bare in mind that if you save him, you will be accountable for your sins. You won't be able to throw your hands in the air and I say "I'm a sinner!! Save me!!" evertime you do something wrong. Rather you will have to be a good person. If you're not a good person you will go to hell.    So what will it be? Save Jesus and be responsible for your own sins or let him die and have the get out of jail free card?

The presence of universal attributes makes me think that it does not.

If you disagree, you must provide scientific evidence that supports evolution. Good luck. There is a ten thousant prize for anyone who can provide this evidence. It remains unclaimed. And saying that the fossil record supports it, or similar DNA in life forms is not valid evidence. If you think about it, you'll understand why.

Some people think so. I say that THEY are worse than bigots, because they are basically saying that one cannot have an opinion on the subject. At least not one contrary to theirs. This is my main gripe about militant homosexuals. They DEMAND that we accept their lifestyle, and even condone it. Some of them actually want legislation passed that would make it a hate crime, simply for voicing disagreement with their lifestyle. What happened to freedom of speech? They want people to be tolerant towards them, while displaying no tolerance for people of faith. They call them bigots and homophobes. I could care less if someone is gay. Just keep it to yourself, and leave the rest of us alone.  

On a website like this one with which people put up debates is it really possible to improve the skill for real world use. Reason being the question is because on this website and many others you have an indefinite amount of time to respond 2 a question that somebody has put up for debate. However in a real world situation you may only have a few seconds to analyze something that somebody has said and create an argument for or against it .

According to the training manual for DHS, These are indicators that someone might be a terrorist.   Expressions of libertarian philosophies (statements, bumper stickers)   Second Amendment-oriented views (NRA or gun club membership, holding a CCW permit)   Survivalist literature (fictional books such as "Patriots" and "One Second After" are mentioned by name)   Self-sufficiency (stockpiling food, ammo, hand tools, medical supplies)   Fear of economic collapse (buying gold and barter items)   Religious views concerning the book of Revelation (apocalypse, anti-Christ)   Expressed fears of Big Brother or big government   Homeschooling   Declarations of Constitutional rights and civil liberties   Belief in a New World Order conspiracy So. Are you a terrorist? I know I am. At least according to the bufoons in Washington. Read more http://www.networkworld.com/article/2228920/microsoft-subnet/ridiculous-dhs-list--you-might-be-a-domestic-terrorist-if---.html

http://www.missblackusa.org/ If you are not sure if that site is racist, just consider: How racist would a "Miss White USA" site be? 

Many people oppose the common core, but are there any noticable benefits?

You can't just make a claim and not back it up with proof.

  “Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness.” - Michael Scriven & Richard Paul, presented at the 8th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking and Education Reform, Summer 1987. link: http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766       Would you support the idea of a government which utilized a computer based system for problem solving operations using a set of algorithms with a strong presence of critical thinking aspects as presented in the above excerpt and a team of elected experts (not one president) which could reflect on this and have fully public meetings and deliberations to come to a sound rationale regarding various legislation and to gather feedback from public forum?   By experts I mean sociologists, physicists, engineers, economists, professors and theoreticists in various areas etc.   By public forum I refer to a real-time internet community of social network/internet forums which can be communicated to the team of elected via the critical thinking computer module even while they deliberate and discus

Why is createdebate still a website? It's been dead for awhile and the trolls are just feeding off of its dead corpse left behind.

 Music help them focusing on their works and ignoring all the noise around them like people talking, laughing, object stuff noise. They hear nothing but music. i love music and it help me focus alot

Do you think that its right for women to get abortations?

In this problem you are standing near a train track. A train is hurdling down the tracks. In the trains path is five people tied up. They cannot move. There is a lever near you. You can divert the train onto another track, but on that track is one person who is unaware of the situation. The one person is too far away to hear you. You cannot hold the lever in a way that will cause the train to derail (hold the lever in the middle). Which option do you choose? Allow the train to kill the five? Or divert the train to kill the one person and save the five? Also, in your response do tell me if you feel as if you are morally obligated to do anything in this situation.