All Debates
You are browsing through all debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
Debaters who ban other debaters are most likely impotent, survey says!
A link from a website that came from a magazine that revolved around a piece of asparagus, was seen by me in a dream, gave over 5000 independent reviews and were proven in a church of blah......
Who do YOU think is the trolliest troll on this debate site?
Who do you think is the worst of the worst when it comes to, Down voting, up voting, banning and crying to mommy? Even though I find it repugnant to give any of these people my time, I see some of the most regressive thoughts displayed, and then when someone calls them out, they get banned, that’s not a debate, it’s a fascism propaganda conference. Let’s identify some of them so that we can avoid wasting our valuable time, that could be better spent debating with actual people.
Maybe not in any of our lifetimes, but eventually the world will be forced to accept a one world government. People will fight and oppose and murder, opposition will get their revenge, millions will die, but it will happen.
What is it these fruitcake trolls get out of interaction on this site?
I have never heard as many completely mentally deranged arguments in one place, they infect the conversation with their obviously disingenuous talking points, only to have them chime in and ban people with legitimate opinions. I never thought I’d have to use the block feature.....
If I create enough blithering moronic posts, I’ll get respect.
If I go on createdebate and make short, blindingly mororic statements, I’ll get really high reward points and even though I’m being disingenuous, and damaging to reason and logic, people will have to respect me cause I have 5000 posts. Derrrrrr.
Hypothetically, if someone popped off a few rounds into the back ass and legs of Marc Rubio’s Rubian body, would he still accept NRA money and just claim that accidents happen, guns don’t shoot people, people do?
Simply put, I believe philosophy, philosophies and philosophers are useless in the wake of scientific discovery and furthermore I believe it should never be considered in a scientific debate. Philosophies are human words that try to relay constructs of form or reason, but are useless as models to come to truth. They are metadata, and if not transcribed to the correct part of the brain, they can be like a bad computer virus, copying over and over the wrong information and interrupting thought.
Should debates be ‘cleaned’ and have bad words and negative ideas removed for you or should people be free to say what they want, regardless of the content, and let people choose to block certain people entirely?
All persons who hired or benefitted from the hiring of Illegal immigrants is complicit in illegal activity and should be deported back to the county of their ancestors origin as well.
Religious people’s brains aren’t configured for interpolation of facts.
Debate with religious people is pointless, because no amount of logic or factual information is accepted, only weakly refuted by pseudoscience and blithery poop.
Religious books or most of them were meant to be interpreted figuratively, as a child’s book may convey important themes and issues, not meant to be taken as literal, unequivocal truth. If read literally it is a barometer for intelligence.
Some artard state recently caught some evil family trying to help themselves by pushing against big pharma by using weed to treat a disorder which resulted in the state kidnaping their kids and holding them for ransom.