For any terror attack a muslim is blamed whether it is in The India OR it is the USA. Is this not raging fires in muslims. Souldn they be blamed for every attack. Is it not against the HUMANITY? I Think they shouldn't be blamed but always the proof is against them and I Believe in PROOFS. So whats your argument ................
I first heard of this argument from Professor Stephen Law , this brief outline of the argument is from Patheos . Imagine that, instead of the Judeo-Christian God (omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent) there was an Evil God that was all-powerful, all-knowing, and totally evil. People who believe in this god are frequently asked by skeptics: “How can you believe in Evil God? Isn’t that hypothesis falsified by the existence of good in the world?”“Nuh-uh” say the believers in Evil God. “We have plenty of explanations for the Problem of Good. For example…”Evil God allows good to exist only so that greater evil may be achievedEvil God likes evil best when we freely choose it, but allowing us free will means that some people may choose goodEvil God works in mysterious waysNot every Judeo-Christian argument can be successfully transposed in this way, but Law doesn’t need to flip them all for his point to stand. If we think these are weak arguments when mustered by the proponents of Evil God, should we give them any more credence when mustered for actual religions?
My own mother is being a bitch right now. I regret the day I was conceived. I wish she had aborted me so I could go to Heaven and be happy. I also want to bitch about feminists. Feminists are a bunch of man hating, baby killing, selfish cunts. I renounce feminism because I care about men and babies.
When it comes to the Global Chaos Progressives say that those that don't believe it are Science Deniers !But when it comes to a man being a woman or a woman being a man they then stand up as being Science Deniers !Why is it Progressive want to deny science when it comes to being born a man or a woman ?But yet they believe science when it comes to the climate and not the science of being born a man or a woman ?The real Science Deniers are the totally confused Progressives that inhabit The United States !
THE FINE LINE BETWEEN A EVIL RELIGIOUS DICTATOR AND UNIVERSAL ENLIGHTENMENT
It is very clear with the current technology available and the rate at which it is advancing that the merge of humans, computers, and the internet will be a reality in the next 50 years ( our lifetime, no joke folks ). Currently scientists have developed genetically engineered cybernetic stingrays, created a rudimentary brain and other organs in a lab, and Bioquark has been cleared to revive dead brain tissue. Scientist have also successfully communicated telepathically via computers and the advancements in nano technology alludes to the medical field and the creation of viruses and vaccines/cures ( all links to all studies in this can be found at the end, or you can google it yourself ) Research like this will one day shake religion and mankind to its core one way or another. Now through this technology and my research in sociology and psychology, I have theorized a treatment, if you will, for sin, samsara, the dark half of humanity, ect ect. The quick fix the psychiatric field has been searching for this whole time, a pill for peace....
Season's almost halfway through, and we've seen a lot out of both players. Russell's been in absolute beast mode every single game so far this season, but Harden's also become an extremely dangerous threat on both ends of the court. Both have decent help (though Harden definitely has more), and both are at the top of the conversation for 2016-17's Most Valuable Player... it's a tight race.
Quotes of lord kelvin....The atheistic idea is so nonsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words.Lord KelvinThere is nothing in science which teaches the origin of anything at all.Let nobody be afraid of true freedom of thought. Let us be free in thought and criticism; but, with freedom, we are bound to come to the conclusion that science is not antagonistic to religion, but a help to it.I believe that the more thoroughly science is studied, the further does it take us from anything comparable to atheism.We only know God in His works, but we are forced by science to admit and to believe with absolute confidence in a Directive Power-in an influence other than physical, or dynamical, or electrical forces,Etc..........………………………………………The spiritual realm is a world of far advanced science which has been, long before man's existence.Beings of the spiritual world posses bodies but of different material and does not rot like that of man. Their bodies are like radiations. And hence, they are able to travel faster than light or sight. They have telepathic abilities and even crossed beyond that height. They are neither limited in knowledge cos there is nothing more to discover. Knowledge we seek is at their disposal. They are superior to the human flesh and can inject anything into our physical world. They are eternal beings. Man can make contact with them. And yes people are. People have been to the astral(of the spiritual world). They also use systems. The have principality hierarchy and when rules are broken, it is punished be it spirit or man(usually death).Science never comprehends the claims of religion becausethese claims are of higher intelligence(used by intelligent(spiritual) beings) yet to be discovered by science in millions of years ahead. Even most of those of who make those religious claims are not aware of what they talk about.(the spiritual scientific world)Gradually, science(study of nature) will make many more discoveries that will lead to the evidence of the existence of God. Science proves God Blindly.Science and religion therefore complement each other(the future holds the truth).Religion is the God and master of science.......
In March 2003 the U.S. invaded Irag suspecting it was harboring weapons of mass destruction. None were ever found but the ruler of the regime Saddam Hussein was executed. Some say the invasion of Irag lead to the birth of ISIS
The concept of Hell cannot co-exist with the concept of an omnibenevolent God. A being with infinite love and infinite forgiveness would not create a place in which his creations are tortured for an eternity. It is a logical fallacy.Either Hell exists and God is not omnibenevolent, or God is omnibenevolent and Hell does not exist.
Animal Cruelty Boycotts and Petitions (Feasible Outcomes)
**Apologies in advance this is my first ever attempt on a debate site**I've recently seen swarms of petitions popping up across social media. The most recent being a petition "Tell Neutrogena to stop all animal testing!". While I see great intent in this (and I'm absolutely not here to debate the ethics and morality involved in animal testing), I'm wondering what petitions like this to global brands can actually accomplish. I've tried to do some research in the area and have come to the following conclusions.* In order to achieve cruelty free (like the leaping bunny approval) the whole company needs to be* Neutrogena is a brand, not a company as it was bought by Johnson and Johnson. (Neutrogena like many global brands is owned by one of a small handful of larger parent companies).* Johnson and Johnson is international and does not only sell cosmetics and hygiene, it sells many other products including medical. Being sold internationally means they have to meet the regulations of all the countries they sell to. some of these countries demand animal testing in order for products to meet their specifications and be sold.So when I see a petition to a brand like Neutrogena I wonder... what is the actual feasible best outcome that can come from this and is this the best outlet for change.The only possible options to accomplish the goal I can see would be to A. have Johnson and Johnson pull out of the countries that demand animal testing (which would dramatically impact their sales and stocks while improving their social opinion and moral standing). OR B. Have the countries with these regulations change their laws.1. Is there another outcome that can come from this? (to make a brand like Neutrogena become animal friendly)1. a) Am I correct in assuming that as a child company Neutrogena as a brand cannot become cruelty free while the parent company (Johnson and Johnson) is not?2. Should petitions like this not be addressed to a brand like Neutrogena but to a Company like Johnson and Johnson instead? Which could potentially educate and involve an even wider demographic. Thanks!
Could it? And by reform, I mean go through a complete personality change to ensure that it becomes much more tolerant of things it previously wasn't of (like the LGBT community and Atheism to name some)
Congressman John Lewis Claims Trump Is Illegitimate President
Why? According to Lewis , it's because Russia hacked emails critical of HRC. Not because the emails contained damming factual evidence about her. Lewis has shown his hyperpartisn opinion for all to see. Whatever he has done in the past for civil rights, in no way excuses his current actions. Time to go. What say you?