All religious followers believe that they are making the right religious choice. They condemn the other religious choices as being incorrect on what evidence is this true. I would like people to give me a little insight as to what evidence they are going by to determine the others are wrong or what evidence they use to determine the others are incorrect.
Should race and gender be a consideration when voting for a presidential candidate? The Democrats seem think so since they are constantly bringing up the issue at every election. I don't think either qualifies you for anything, especially an elected office. Democrats think you're too stupid to see through their ruse. I think they're wrong. What do you think; do you think race and gender should be considered when voting?
The Freewill Argument for the Nonexistence of God: Sound? The Christian God is defined as a personal being who knows everything. According to Christians, personal beings have free will.In order to have free will, you must have more than one option, each of which is avoidable. This means that before you make a choice, there must be a state of uncertainty during a period of potential: you cannot know the future. Even if you think you can predict your decision, if you claim to have free will, you must admit the potential (if not the desire) to change your mind before the decision is final.A being who knows everything can have no "state of uncertainty." It knows its choices in advance. This means that it has no potential to avoid its choices, and therefore lacks free will. Since a being that lacks free will is not a personal being, a personal being who knows everything cannot exist.Therefore, the Christian God does not exist.- Dan Barker
Will Donald J. Trump bring religious unification to the USA by kicking out Muslims?
Many people see Donald Trump as the savior for eliminating Muslims from his rallies and disallowing them to enter the USA (if he becomes president), while others see him as the anti-christ for doing so.
Let's see, if you are banned, it's not your fault & it's ok to copy those who banned you.
This about sums up our no fault culture. If you act in a way that gets you banned from a debate, don't worry, you can just copy the person's debate who banned you.Now if the copied debate is removed, you can simply copy it once again which makes the copied debate the newest debate on the debate list. It confuses people and gets the new posts from people who have no clue what is going on.At the moment there is only one idiot copying debates. I wonder what would happen if every person who is banned from an argument started copying debates?-FromWithinOriginal Debate: http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Let_s_see_if_you_are_banned_it_s_not_your_fault_it_s_ok_to_copy_those_who_banned_you
Pluto and Goofy are both beloved characters from Mickey Mouse. They are both dogs. They have similar face and body structures. So how come Pluto is a pet and can not talk, while Goofy is a free "man" and can talk. Is Pluto Goofy's mentally handicapped brother? Is this a move by the tea-party conservatives to show how slavery can be justified and your intelligence decides whether or not you can be free? Or is it a move by the left-wing to show how the mentally disabled need welfare (mickey) to survive and that even though Goofy and Pluto are equal since Pluto is disabled he gets protection from Mickey?WHAT IS GOING ON?!!!