it you see a dog in a front garden and did not know the owner and did not ask for permission from the owner should it be illegal to take a photo that focuses on the animal (a photo that focuses on the dog is were if just the dog and if it doesnt it wouldjust be in the back round  

it you see a dog in a front garden and did not know the owner and did not ask for permission from the owner should it be illegal to take a photo that focuses on the animal (a photo that focuses on the dog is were if just the dog and if it doesnt it wouldjust be in the back round  

At my public high-school in New Zealand the science department has some posters up which support atheism.  One such example is a poster which quotes Richard Dawkins saying *"How thoughtful of God to arrange matters so that, wherever you happen to be born, the local religion always turns out to be the true one."*  There are other atheist and anti-theist posters up around our science department.  My question is: Is this okay?I thought this would be interesting, as the usual conversation about this sort of thing is centered on public schools condoning religion, especially in the U.S.  I definitely believe that to put up posters supporting a religion in a public school is wrong, and I'll post my argument concerning atheist posters (and similar things that condone atheism) below.  NOTE: I am not looking for an argument as to whether or not it *is* legal, but as to whether or not it *should be* legal.  Also, anybody who says that atheism is a religion, will be banned immediately.  As per usual, keep things civil in this debate.  I also don't want this debate to get into whether or not a god exists, let's try and remain neutral here.

If I stated in a public forum for example: "Go kill someone who really desrves it tonight, then come back and tell the world how I inspired you"and someone actually went out and killed someone, then came back and claimed that I inspired them.

Hate speech is defined as speech which attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as race, religion, ethnicity, sexuality, disability or gender. It is not incitement to violence or criminality which is illegal in it's own right.Should racist/sexist/homophobic etc. speech be allowed in the interests of liberty and the free exchange of ideas? Or should it be outlawed in order to protect those in the group it is directed against?

Do you think any human or group of humans has the right to make settlements on unoccupied land or do you think current property ownership laws are fair and sustainable.

Schools have many consequences to fighting and bullying, I think that if someone agrees to fight another person they should be able to fight without any consequences or being labeled a "bully" We are creating a society of victims, if someone picks on you or harasses you, punch them, why make such a big deal? 

I've been thinking about this for a while. Should pg (as in kids could look at it) graffiti, as long as it is on a public not private building or railcar, be legal. As it is just art on a wall, it usually makes it look nice, or cool. But understandably it is still vandalism. So should it be legal or not? 

This topic is still being debated right now and i for one am for it and against it but i cant find reasons why, so help me to gather useful information what the death penalty is a good thing please

Let your voice be heard

America is racist, but most of the racism comes from the Left.

Lawyers has to study for 7or even 7+ years and throughout all thlse years they have to read thousands of thick books, which I don't I understand why they have to.It doesn't seem as a very attached to reading industry or does it?

Hello:Some people said that women CAN'T get pregnant if they're raped.  I wonder if those same people think a woman CAN'T orgasm if she's raped, and IF she does, it's PROOF that she wasn't raped.excon

Just curious on what you think is better. And by the way, before you say anarchy is chaos, i'm talking about the concept displayed in the website belowabolishgovernmentnow.com

People believe that children should be hit as they have became more spoilt since the parents don't hit their children for true discipline.But, others believe that hitting for discipline is bad for children as they believe it will put major scars on their life.Decide which side you are on and debate like mad. Make steam come off your keyboard until you get what you want said, said.

If you win a court case, should your opponent pay your legal costs?

So many people and I mean BILLIANS hate Donald Trump but should Mexicans stay or not?

Here's the link of my argument. Please read.http://www.debate.org/debates/Forced-circumcision-of-older-minors-practiced-in-many-Asian-African-and-Muslim-countries-is-a-crime/1/

due to molestation cases all think that women should have different laws and some says should have different laws. 

Attorney General Loretta Lynch said schools that don't comply may face lawsuits or lose federal aid if they do not comply.One senior Republican politician has condemned the move as the "beginning of the end" of the current school system.In a separate move, the president also strengthened protections for LGBT people receiving health care.The federal government is fighting the state of North Carolina in court over a law requiring people to use toilets according to their gender at birth.However the Obama administration education and justice departments say public schools must respect transgender pupils' gender identity even if their education records or identity documents indicate a different sex."There is no room in our schools for discrimination of any kind, including discrimination against transgender students on the basis of their sex," Ms Lynch said.Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36286111