For example, if a guy changes himself into an Amanda, I will refer to him as 'Amanda' but will say: "Yes, Amanda, he did tell me that" or, "Haha, Amanda, you are one crazy guy."
I'm respecting him rightfully by referring to him by his legal name. However, I will not negate biology just to satisfy his dysfunctional illusion/mind-state.
Do you go along with schizophrenic individuals having a hallucination episode?
(NOTE: I DID NOT SAY GENDER I SAID SEX.)
What boundaries exist in this extremist Democrat party today? Selling Baby organs?
Is there nothing sacrosanct in today's new age politically correct Democrat party? I would have thought maybe, just maybe even Democrats would have to take a stand against such inhumanity as selling Baby organs. I would be wrong! I guess that those who vote for Democrats have lowered their bar of humanity to such inhuman levels that there is absolutely nothing too evil for the Democrat party to condone, and fear losing your vote.
This is what happens to a Godless nation. Man becomes his own God and would sanction any behavior no matter how inhuman, as long as it does not interfere with his pleasures or subsidies in life.
What is so amazing is that we now have pious hypocritical Liberals falling all over themselves insulting hunters or others who might kill an animal, or might treat a pet without compassion, etc. THESE SAME PEOPLE SAY NOTHING WHILE LATE TERM BABIES ARE ABORTED AND THEIR ORGANS SOLD!
Can your simple minds even grasp that kind of hypocritical misplaced compassion and depravity? We have PETA groups who supposedly are so caring for animals but say NOTHING over the dismantelling of late term babies. It's like some horror movie but one condoned by Democrats.
How on earth do Catholics vote for the Democrat party? Obamacared tried to force their catholic schools and hospitals to pay for birth control and abortions. Now Catholics will be supporting selling Baby organs when you vote for Democrats. Does your faith mean ANYTHING TO YOU? This goes for Protestants as well. TAKE A STAND FOR YOUR FAITH OR ADMIT YOU ARE COMPLETE PHONIES.
India known all around the world for its spices,quality goods,good hospitality,culture,food,architecture as well as corruption,population,etc.But the traffic in India..argh..typical to get out of it.Visited India once?No,then you should.
Corruption is operationally defined as the misuse of entrusted power for private gain. Facilitation payments, where a bribe is paid to receive preferential treatment for something that the receiver is required to do by law (e.g. an official processing a license application), constitute "according to rule" corruption. Corruption "against the rule", on the other hand, is a bribe paid to obtain services the receiver is prohibited from providing (e.g. a policeman ignoring a crime or favourable marking of a student’s examination paper).
The phenomenon of corruption has complex reasons that include flaws in legal system, the lack of democratic traditions and political accountability, social and economic difficulties, and low pay for public officials. Corruption affects people's lives in a multitude of ways. In the worst cases, corruption costs people’s lives. In countless other cases, it costs their freedom, health, or money. It is becoming an international problem due to increasing level of globalisation and international trade.
The role of women in the family and the workplace has been an issue of great change and even greater implication throughout recent history. Changing social constructions of gender roles and family roles has led to a debate over the role of women in the home and the value or lack thereof placed upon it. If the role of women is no longer always in the home should there be some compensation for those who do still agree to remain housewives (or very occasionally househusbands) in return for the work they do? The debate over housewives being paid for their work is one of entitlement, economics and social engineering.
Although this is a primarily a principled debate, one possible skeleton model for this case would be to propose that all housewives would be given equal salary from the government fund that is funded through tax payer dollars. This would be carried out in the form of tax exemptions and tax rebates that would be doled out via the institutions and processes currently in place for tax returns, auditing etc. An example of this would be the Internal Revenue Service in the United States or the Canada Revenue Agency in Canada.
What a shock, the Democrat party supports forcing businesses to pay $15 minimum wage!
Just one more Democrat Socialist agenda forced onto private businesses. No shock that the two most Liberal states, California and New York are the first ones to force the $15 minimum wage. I wonder if Liberals are truly that clinically stupid, or they are that corrupt.
What will happen when companies are forced to pay at least $15 an hour to all their employees? Companies are starting to tell us what they will have to do. They will of course raise the costs of their products whether it be food, gas, or basically every staple we use in our daily lives.(INFLATION)
They also said they would have to automate more of their businesses which will cost people their jobs! Where will those people go for new jobs? They will go to WELFARE where Democrts keep trying to make it an easier more fulfilling lifestyle without the need to WORK! What will more and more people on welfare do to our property taxes? Obamacare has added millions of people onto medicaid costing tax payers higher and higher property taxes.
Are you mind numbingly stupid enough to swallow the lies coming out of Democrat's mouths?(remember if you like your Doctor and your insurance you can keep it, and your preminums will go down) LOL, what corrupt liars!
These people working minimum wage jobs will not get off welfare and start supporting themselves because the inflation created by this mandate will raise the cost of living to poor people as well as the middle class. Democrats will once again raise the low income wage limit(tied to inflation and the whims of Democrats) which will keep these same people on welfare and medicaid.
It's a hedious cycle with one goal in mind. To redistribute hard working American's money to bring everyone's earnings income levels to equal status regardless the work and stress and abilities demanded by the once higher paying jobs.
Can mindless Democrats understand the merit system? Can they understand the simple fact that more demanding, more stressful jobs demand MORE MONEY or no one will take those jobs. I have already heard of people saying they will no longer work a more stressful job for a few more dollars an hour if they can just get a mnimum wage job with no stress that pays $15 per hour.
What will happen in states where they have the sense not to raise minimum wage to such ludicrous hieghts? Will people move to states where they can still get a Big Mack that does not cost what used to cost for dinner out at a nice restaurant?
Government destroys most everything it touches and these extreme Liberals running the Democrat party are bent on a socialist ideology.
If you don't start electing Conservatives with common sense then YOU ARE THE PROBLEM AND THE CAUSE OF OUR NATION'S FALL.
TYT--The Young Turks--is a very popular YouTube-based news network that has recently condemned PETA for a just statement in which they claim the dentist guilty of killing an innocent should be executed through a sort of death penalty.
Now, this condemnation is only present because it was the killing of an innocent Lion. But if it was the killing of an innocent baby I'm sure the response would have been entirely different. I contest to the amount of animosity they're expressing towards PETA because of such a statement as if this killer should be forgiven for his atrocious actions.
They say that people seem to care more about the killing of an animal rather than a human being as if this is somehow an abysmal position? Of course people care more because it is worse to kill an animal as apposed to human. Animals are innocent in their entirety- but humans, eventually or otherwise, will be guilty of some immoral action (esp. if you argue that humans are the only species that understands moral consequences of actions).
Nearly every country in the developed world, and more and more in the developing world, provide free primary and secondary education. Such education is generally uncontroversial and accepted as necessary by both liberals and conservatives around the world. In the case of university education, however, there is a great deal of disparity between countries’ education policies. In many states students must pay fees to attend university, for which they may seek student loans or grants. Often states offer financial assistance to individuals who cannot afford to pay fees and lack other methods of payment. In other states, university education is completely free and considered a citizen’s right to attend. Debates center on the issues of whether there is in fact a right to university education, and on whether states can feasibly afford to finance such education.