You are browsing through Politics debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
Hillary Clinton is campaigning on a war against gun stores, gun makers, and gun owners, yet she has spent decades of her life—perhaps the majority of her life—enjoying around-the-clock armed protection either for offices she occupied or those occupied by her husband Bill Clinton.For example, Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas for 12 years (1979-81 and 1983-1993). It seems fair to presume the governor and his wife enjoyed armed security and transport. And Bill Clinton’s departure from the office of governor coincided with his entrance into the White House, where he served as president from 1993 to 2001. Upon entering the White House, the armed security went to its highest levels, as the president and First Lady Mrs. Clinton were surrounded by defensive Secret Service teams, tactical response teams, and integrated law enforcement and military personnel wherever they went.Why is it these Leftist Elitist are so anti-gun when they are protected by guns ? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/24/anti-gun-hillary-clinton-enjoyed-taxpayer-funded-armed-security-decades/
DES MOINES – Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton dodged a debate question about her own role in underestimating the terrorist group ISIS during her time as Secretary of State.“I don’t think the United States has the bulk of the responsibility” for ISIS, Clinton said after a CBS moderator pressed her on the issue just one day after the ISIS-credited terrorist attacks in Paris. “I really put that on Assad and the Iraqis and the region.” Clinton explained that a trained Iraqi army was ready to defend its country when the U.S. left under President Obama, but that former Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki “set about devastating it.”So is it the Iraqis fault or that of Obie's actions ?http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/14/hillary-clinton-isis-iraqis-fault-sanders-slams-iraq-war/
Clinton, who wants to import thousands of Syrian refugees, told reporters in Reno that it would look bad not to let in Syrian refugees, and that might inflame Muslims against law enforcement.“If you’re in law enforcement, … you want the people in the communities that you are looking to get information from to feel like they want to help you,” Clinton said at a Nevada roundtable. “And if the message from people who are running for president, for example, is that we don’t want to take any Muslims whatsoever, that’s not good for law enforcement.”Does the stupidity of the Leftist ever stop ? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/23/hillary-clinton-blocking-refugees-will-make-muslims-angry-at-police-officers/
If Carly Fiorina were to become the GOP Presidential Nominee and Hillary were to become the Democratic Presidential Nominee, do you think Carly, even though she never held a political office, could beat Hillary Clinton?
I actually think that Donald Trump should be president over Hilary Clinton. Hilary Clinton is nothing but a deceiving woman who deserves nothing less than disqualification. She has covered up child pornography, how low could you stoop? She did it selfishly, too, only for her own good. By the recent news, Hilary Clinton covered up to save her workers from emailing each other child porn, which is sick and selfish. Nevermind disqualification, she should be arrested for 10 years or more. Donald Trump does have his falls, he has and will insult anyone he can and speaks with an ill tongue, but still, he is a much better candidate than Hilary Clinton, she doesn't deserve to be president. Think if she did get elected, she would cover things up and not tell us, leading to ultimate destruction, this isn't a joke. Presidents need to be someone who can be trusted to warn us when things happen, something needs to be done about Clinton, she can't be trusted.
Clinton Says She ‘Misspoke’ About Dodging Sniper FireBLUE BELL, Pa. — As part of her argument that she has the best experience and instincts to deal with a sudden crisis as president, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton recently offered a vivid description of having to run across a tarmac to avoid sniper fire after landing inBosnia as first lady in 1996.Yet on Monday, Mrs. Clinton admitted that she “misspoke” about the episode — a concession that came after CBS News showed footage of her walking calmly across the tarmac with her daughter, Chelsea, and being greeted by dignitaries and a child.Mrs. Clinton corrected herself at a meeting with the Philadelphia Daily News editorial board; she did not explain why she had misspoken, but only admitted it and then offered a less dramatic description.Mrs. Clinton said she had been told “that we had to land a certain way and move quickly because of the threat of sniper fire,” not that actual shots were being fired.“So I misspoke,” she said.http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/us/politics/25clinton.htmlAccording to Hillary to misspeak is not to LIE !
Tomorrow Hillary Clinton is scheduled to announce her intention to seek the office of president of these United States, one of the most powerful positions in the world. Her chosen venue will not be an event with cheering supporters, applauding in the back ground. No excited crowd of onlookers to bolster enthusiasm for her candidacy.
Rather she will use Twitter to present her great announcement as a tweet.
Is it just me, or does this seem just wrong somehow?
CNN's Wolf Blitzer asked Hillary if she was part of the establishment and her answer !She responded, “Well, I have to say, I didn’t understand that at all. Planned Parenthood does so much on the front lines to provide women, and men, healthcare, often low income people, people who don’t have any alternative. And of course, we know that Planned Parenthood has been under attack, constantly, from the Republicans, both in Congress, and in many states. And the Human Rights Campaign has been in the forefront of making sure that LGBT Americans are not discriminated against. They helped to lead the battle for marriage equality. I really don’t understand what he means by that. These are two of the really great human rights, progressive organizations in our country. I’ve worked with both of them a long time. I’ve worked to get results for the people that they represent and serve, and I’m proud to have endorsements from both of them.”Anchor Wolf Blitzer then followed-up “But are you the establishment?”Hillary answered, “I just don’t understand what that means. He’s been in Congress, he’s been elected to office a lot longer than I have. I was in the Senate for eight wonderful years, representing New York. He’s been in the Congress for 25. And so, I’ll let your viewers make their own judgment.”Why is it Hillary does not understand the word "Establishment" ?http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/01/21/hillary-i-dont-know-what-establishment-means/
Do you believe that Hillary Clinton inoccently used an email server in her home while she was secretary of state. Or do you believe she purposefully wanted to keep her messages away from the public eye.
Should there be another Bush or Clinton in office? Or is it too much? Is it a path towards a family monopoly in US politics, or are the naysayers simply being paranoid? Will the democrats and republicans simply be looking for the candidate that will give them the best chance to win, or are money and influence going to be the deciding factors? Or maybe a little of both? You decide.