You are browsing through Politics debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
Hillary Clinton is campaigning on a war against gun stores, gun makers, and gun owners, yet she has spent decades of her life—perhaps the majority of her life—enjoying around-the-clock armed protection either for offices she occupied or those occupied by her husband Bill Clinton.For example, Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas for 12 years (1979-81 and 1983-1993). It seems fair to presume the governor and his wife enjoyed armed security and transport. And Bill Clinton’s departure from the office of governor coincided with his entrance into the White House, where he served as president from 1993 to 2001. Upon entering the White House, the armed security went to its highest levels, as the president and First Lady Mrs. Clinton were surrounded by defensive Secret Service teams, tactical response teams, and integrated law enforcement and military personnel wherever they went.Why is it these Leftist Elitist are so anti-gun when they are protected by guns ? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/24/anti-gun-hillary-clinton-enjoyed-taxpayer-funded-armed-security-decades/
DES MOINES – Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton dodged a debate question about her own role in underestimating the terrorist group ISIS during her time as Secretary of State.“I don’t think the United States has the bulk of the responsibility” for ISIS, Clinton said after a CBS moderator pressed her on the issue just one day after the ISIS-credited terrorist attacks in Paris. “I really put that on Assad and the Iraqis and the region.” Clinton explained that a trained Iraqi army was ready to defend its country when the U.S. left under President Obama, but that former Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki “set about devastating it.”So is it the Iraqis fault or that of Obie's actions ?http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/14/hillary-clinton-isis-iraqis-fault-sanders-slams-iraq-war/
Clinton, who wants to import thousands of Syrian refugees, told reporters in Reno that it would look bad not to let in Syrian refugees, and that might inflame Muslims against law enforcement.“If you’re in law enforcement, … you want the people in the communities that you are looking to get information from to feel like they want to help you,” Clinton said at a Nevada roundtable. “And if the message from people who are running for president, for example, is that we don’t want to take any Muslims whatsoever, that’s not good for law enforcement.”Does the stupidity of the Leftist ever stop ? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/23/hillary-clinton-blocking-refugees-will-make-muslims-angry-at-police-officers/
If Carly Fiorina were to become the GOP Presidential Nominee and Hillary were to become the Democratic Presidential Nominee, do you think Carly, even though she never held a political office, could beat Hillary Clinton?
I actually think that Donald Trump should be president over Hilary Clinton. Hilary Clinton is nothing but a deceiving woman who deserves nothing less than disqualification. She has covered up child pornography, how low could you stoop? She did it selfishly, too, only for her own good. By the recent news, Hilary Clinton covered up to save her workers from emailing each other child porn, which is sick and selfish. Nevermind disqualification, she should be arrested for 10 years or more. Donald Trump does have his falls, he has and will insult anyone he can and speaks with an ill tongue, but still, he is a much better candidate than Hilary Clinton, she doesn't deserve to be president. Think if she did get elected, she would cover things up and not tell us, leading to ultimate destruction, this isn't a joke. Presidents need to be someone who can be trusted to warn us when things happen, something needs to be done about Clinton, she can't be trusted.
Clinton Says She ‘Misspoke’ About Dodging Sniper FireBLUE BELL, Pa. — As part of her argument that she has the best experience and instincts to deal with a sudden crisis as president, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton recently offered a vivid description of having to run across a tarmac to avoid sniper fire after landing inBosnia as first lady in 1996.Yet on Monday, Mrs. Clinton admitted that she “misspoke” about the episode — a concession that came after CBS News showed footage of her walking calmly across the tarmac with her daughter, Chelsea, and being greeted by dignitaries and a child.Mrs. Clinton corrected herself at a meeting with the Philadelphia Daily News editorial board; she did not explain why she had misspoken, but only admitted it and then offered a less dramatic description.Mrs. Clinton said she had been told “that we had to land a certain way and move quickly because of the threat of sniper fire,” not that actual shots were being fired.“So I misspoke,” she said.http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/us/politics/25clinton.htmlAccording to Hillary to misspeak is not to LIE !
Tomorrow Hillary Clinton is scheduled to announce her intention to seek the office of president of these United States, one of the most powerful positions in the world. Her chosen venue will not be an event with cheering supporters, applauding in the back ground. No excited crowd of onlookers to bolster enthusiasm for her candidacy.
Rather she will use Twitter to present her great announcement as a tweet.
Is it just me, or does this seem just wrong somehow?
Do you believe that Hillary Clinton inoccently used an email server in her home while she was secretary of state. Or do you believe she purposefully wanted to keep her messages away from the public eye.
On November 20 Democrat presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton expressed astonishment that Republicans in the House and Senate oppose more gun control following terror attacks in Paris, France.She was specifically referencing the Republican’s refusal to expand background checks to include the same no-fly list that once inadvertently contained Senator Ted Kennedy’s name. It is the same list which the Huffington Post described as being so imprecise that an individual can end up on it by simply being “unlucky.”Yet according to CNN, Clinton said:Leaders in the House and Senate won’t even allow a vote on whether we should prevent people on the no-fly list from buying guns, including possible terrorists. It is just beyond one’s imagination; these are people too dangerous to be let on airplanes but Congress won’t stop them from getting guns. It is just something that makes no sense.So has the Obama Regime allowed terrorist into this country ?http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/24/hillary-clinton-aghast-gop-rejecting-gun-control-post-paris-attack/
Hillary Clinton's campaign has demanded a comedy club remove a video of stand-up comics mocking the presidential contender, its owner claims.Laugh Factory boss Jamie Masada said he received a call from an aide for the Democratic front runner telling him to take down a three-minute recording posted on the club's website and YouTube page.The video shows five comedians roasting Clinton, with jokes about her relationship with Bill Clinton, the Monica Lewinsky scandal and the former Secretary of State going through the menopause. Mr Masada told Judicial Watch that a Clinton aide phoned him up and asked for the names and phone numbers of all the comedians in the clip. It is not clear why they would ask for the comedians' names as they are included in the video. 'They threatened me,' Mr Masada said. 'I have received complains before but never a call like this, threatening to put me out of business if I don’t cut the video.'He said the video was disgusting and asked who put me up to thisIs Hillary Clinton really this thin skinned or is it she doesn't believe in the 1st Amendment ?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3324857/Not-laughing-matter-Hillary-Clinton-campaign-demands-comedy-club-takes-video-mocking-owner-claims.html
Hillary Clinton believes victims of sexual assault have “a right to be believed.” Except, of course, if the accusations are made against her husband and could complicate her political aspirations.In Clinton’s new web ad, titled “Hillary’s Message to Survivors of Sexual Assault,” the candidate claims:I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault.Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have a right to be heard. You have a right to be believed. We’re with you.But that’s a very different message Kathleen Willey received in 1993 when she accused Hillary’s husband, President Bill Clinton, of sexually assaulting her.“She believed what happened for sure,” Willey tells The American Mirror. “She just chose to ignore the plight of all of his victims, thus enabling him to continue to abuse and rape women in the future.”
Should there be another Bush or Clinton in office? Or is it too much? Is it a path towards a family monopoly in US politics, or are the naysayers simply being paranoid? Will the democrats and republicans simply be looking for the candidate that will give them the best chance to win, or are money and influence going to be the deciding factors? Or maybe a little of both? You decide.