Goodlistener accused me of being Milk Jar, but he is the one making the "google" accounts to point farm and is a known troll who was banned 4 years ago. So is it really that improbable that HE is Milk Jar and that he is also many of the other accounts that I get blamed for such as Sv3rige and DeepDarkness? The truth is I am none of these and I believe he is blaming me because I am the easiest target who everyone already hates and calls a troll. I have made other alt accounts, but these aren't the ones I always get accused for. Also Goodlistener is a rapper like me, I think he has been biting my style to frame me and posting raps on alt accounts.He was once the troll known as "Rogue Rascal" Who also went by del1176 and prodigee. I know this because of my extreme deductive abilities of geniusy...Take a look at THIS piconlineDelete | Block GoodListener said:Del1176 was Prodigee. The account named Prodigee Andy made himself to make sure no one takes it again.The account 'Rogue Rascal' was actually named Prodigee as I made it right after getting banned and asked Andy to change it.He has had many phases of loving me and hating me (in public he always posed as my enemy but in PM he backed me at times, even telling Hellno to not post on my debates sometimes).Andy is basically a love-hate admin. You either love him or hate him. I love him.1 day ago.Write to GoodListenerpiconlineDelete | Block FactMachine said:Del1176ProdigeeRogue Rascal???1 day ago.Write to FactMachinepiconlineDelete | Block GoodListener said:Andy banned my account completely, you wont find the original account unless you are smart and look very deep.
In my fifth period class, we are talking about which age kids are adults. We have 16 years old or 21 years old. Personally I think 16 years old is considered an adult, because at the age of 16, you are old enough to make your decisions.
Friday afternoon, the FBI released a 29-page document containing Justice Department emails regarding the infamous meeting on the tarmac in Phoenix between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton just days before FBI Director James Comey gave his much-criticized announcement that he would not press for charges against Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her "extreme carelessness" in handling classified material.The emails, spanning from July 1-3, 2016, contain correspondence among various DOJ officials to the leaking of the impromptu 30-minute meeting between Lynch and Clinton that the AG insists was merely a personal chat about their grandchildren and recent travels, but what many continue to suspect had something to do with the ongoing investigation of then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Comey's press conference in which he announced that he would not request Lynch to pursue charges was on July 5.The emails appear to contain no bombshells, but do show that members of the department were outraged over the "secret" meeting getting leaked to the press and considering ramping up measures to prevent future leaks. Some of the correspondence, including about how to handle the fallout from the leaked meeting, are redacted.The emails include correspondence from FBI agent Peter Strzok, whom special counsel Robert Mueller removed from his investigation this summer due to Strzok's overt anti-Donald Trump bias. Strzok was a central figure in not only the Clinton investigation, but also in the investigation into the unverified, salacious Russian dossier and Trump's associates. Strzok also reportedly played key role in softening Comey's statement on Hillary Clinton. Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe are also among the officials featured in the emails.The Washington Free Beacon's Katie Pavloch provides a summary of the emails' content:A series of emails show one FBI official, whose name and email are redacted, fuming over leaks to the media about the meeting and what happened on the tarmac. The official received an email from a "layman" alleging a local Phoenix police officer who may have talked to a reporter "sounds like a security threat." Officials went back and forth about finding out if the officer was SWAT or simply worked the motorcade and that "at a minimum" he should never work another detail again. One asked if local law enforcement assisting the FBI on motorcades should sign non-disclosure agreements in the future. Another official called an Observer article about the meeting, with details about how President Clinton got to Lynch's private plane, "infuriating."https://www.dailywire.com/news/24753/fbi-release-emails-secret-loretta-lynch-bill-james-barrett?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand
He called me Lucifer for supporting peaceful disobedience, and banned me, so I'm responding here. Were the founding fathers wrong? Was Dr. King wrong? Was JESUS wrong when he disobeyed the Pharisees and Romans to save our souls? Don't be a sheeple. If the government tells me to murder my mother, you bet my lilly white ass I'll disobey! DUH! Jesus is God, not government.
Private donation means that the prospective parents (usually a lesbian couple of single woman) choose you to be the "father" of their baby. You often have at least some contact with the child when they are older to know where the came from. I am considering doing this as an act of charity and wondered what people here thought. Would you do it?
Lisa Bloom, Feminist Lawyer-One woman got her mortgage paid off. One got $300,000. Another was offered $750,000. Really?http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/365068-exclusive-prominent-lawyer-sought-donor-cash-for-two-trump-accusers
I was an attorney in a federal criminal case, I'd certainly tell the
jury that the president of the United States thinks the FBI is a
disgrace, so you should too.. I'd tell them that my client is the
victim of a witch hunt as well.. Find him not guilty..Trump didn't do law enforcement any favors this week.excon
Are Nazi's allowed to participate in debates here? If they are I'm gone.
A Nazi sporting a swastika avatar has posted here today questioning the holocaust. There are people responding to this Nazi as if it's perfectly normal. I want to know if this is going to be allowed because if it is then I won't waste another split second with this site.
Based on the articles read in class and the evidence given, state your claim(position) on "when do kids become adults". Be sure to cite evidence from the articles- "What the brain says about maturity" by Laurence Steinberg, "Leave the voting age alone" by Jenny Cheng, "Better training for new drivers" by Jamie Kitman, "A parent's role in the path to adulthood" by Barbara Hofer, Mandatory Service to become am adult" by Michael Thompson. I am using this debate for my student, so please post with appropriate language.
lawyer owes a duty to the law.. A paralegal owes NO duty. Scientists
OWE a duty to science.. A technician OWES nothing.. A CPA owes a duty
to his profession.. An accountant owes NO duty.. A journalist owes a duty to his profession. A pundit does not. We DO that so
when a PROFESSIONAL says something, it's his PROFESSION speaking, and NOT the individual.. Do you hold
what NON professionals say in the same regard as what professionals