Science and technology have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that each unborn child is a unique member of the human family with his or her own genetic makeup separate from the mother or father. What is common from pro-aborts is to say that the unborn is just a blob, a mass of tissue. It can't think, can't feel, its tiny...therefore it's ok to kill. This tissue however so says science is a new human being. Even if the pro-abort agrees with what medical science says, many times it makes no difference...they maintain the choice should lie with the woman. It is her body, her choice. Many say that choice should be allowed on demand throughout the entire nine months...no reason...and some say no...the more the unborn looks like a baby...killing should be off the table. The unborn is not a blob...not just a hunk of tissue. It is a living human being from conception...and science states this over and over...and yet pro-aborts don't get it, they choose NOT to believe it. They think that only someone who comes to this issue through God...would think this way. The fact is everyone of us came to be after our mothers egg was conceived with our fathers sperm.This is when our human life began. Everything we needed happened then. You had your own genetic makeup, your own organs.....apart from your parents. The unborn baby is not the mothers body.    I provide this proof from nonreligious sources.    

Pro-choice is pro-abortion....it is about the rights of the woman to be able to kill the newly formed human life inside her body.  Most pro-aborts want abortion legal at least until viability....various deadlines when women can kill....18 weeks, 20 weeks, 22 weeks, 24 weeks. They have no idea when the life becomes viable...it is a guessing game for them....a crap shoot. Then there are those pro-aborts who want abortion legal the entire pregnancy. Abortion on demand for any reason throughout nine months. For them it is the woman's right to choose...it is their body.  This vile position is not hypocritical...it is a hardline stance about killing living human children. It is the position with no morality connected to it whatsoever. Those on the pro-life side, those who recognize and defend the personhood in the womb...are told by pro-aborts that they have no right to force their morality on the women who are pregnant. But if they want to put restrictions on women by forcing them to carry the child pass viability...it's doing the same thing. Their position is hypocritical. They are doing what they tell pro-lifers they have no right to do. They use their morality to force and enslave women.     

I am told daily on this debate site mainly by unbelievers that I have no right to judge, that I should basically keep my mouth shut that judging is not right it is wrong. What they fail to understand is that they judge as well. They think that faith and judging are mutally exclusive to Christians. But people who do not adhere and reject God judge as well if not more. Look at the judging that goes on by unbelievers on this forum, yet they point the finger at people who believe in God. One does not need be a person who believes in God to judge, everyone does it, we could not live if we didn't. How would we protect the righteous? I believe in society today people take a negative attitude when it comes to judging. It resents authority and everything that goes with it. The primary function of judging is not to punish the wicked its to protect the righteous. Our justice system today is a perfect example of this. We bend over backwards to protect the criminal and do little to protect the victim. This kind of thinking is warped. Here is a big verse they throw at Christians. "Judge lest not you be judged. You therefore have no right to judge me when comes to my sins."   What does this mean however? In the context of this verse Jesus is telling the disciples not to judge one another, something the Bible condemns. In other veses Jesus talks about the speck in his brothers eye. But in John 7:24 it says, "Judge not according to the appearance but judge righteous judgement." So if someone sins by killing, stealing, commiting adultry...the Christian can make a righteous judgement by telling the sinner or believer they are wrong and that these sins will have eternal consequences. Who here has not judged a spouse, parent, teacher, pastor, priest, police, kids friends, children, sibling, lawyer, doctor? We all do it ...but somehow if a Christian does it its worse. They are accused by people who do not understand what all the scriptures say. There is a doule standard. The Bible says that I can judge another believers words and actions but that I can not judge their heart. Only God can do this. Here are a few other verses that show we can judge.   Matthew 18:15-17 Jesus talks about if someone offends you...you seek him out and tell him his fault. If he does not listen then you take more people with you and if that does not work...you address the concern to the church. 1 Cor 5:11 We are told not to associate with immoral people. He is telling us that juding is a responsiblity that we must do. 1 Cor 6:1-4 This talks about judging and throwing the sinful person out. It talks about leaders have a responsiblity to judge. We appoint jurors and judges the authority to judge....we have to have do it. For the people who are debating on this site who point their fingers at Christians who judge ..how do you explain the fact that you are judging as well?   The fact is everyone does it...we could not survive if we didn't. 

I find this video hilarious but more alarming and sad. Obama has no clue as to how many states are in the U.S. This is just one incident of his obvious lack of education. He supposedly went to Columbia, then graduated from Harvard. So much for his ivy league education............ Here is a video that exposed his lack of education. He says, "the bomb" that fell on Pearl Harbor. Was there just a single bomb? He did not even know that our American troops did not liberate Auschwitz. The Soviet Red Army did. He does not even know the meaning and purpose of Memorial Day. Fallen heros in the audience? The facts about "bloody Sunday"?  The date of the marches.......1965? Does not line up with what he is saying about the birth of his son which means when he was writing this nonsense he didn't add right....Hmmmm  Hows could 1965 events result in a 1961 birth? And Obama blames Bush for eight years of hostility towards Chavez when Clinton was president at the time. He said he traveled in 57 states....with 1 left to go. Alaska and Hawaii he was not allowed to go to.....which makes 60 total American states.  Then he pronounces one of our states as...."massatoosits..." EAu Claire he called a state. Wisconsins the state Mr. President, Eau Claire is a city. What "states in the middle?"  While he was addressing an audience in Sioux Falls South Dakota...he called it Sioux City IA. And when talking about the tragedy in Kansas he said that 10,000 people died and an entire town destroyed. Actually twelve died.   Does he know how many years a president serves? He said eight to ten...years. The Constitutional limit is eight. This video is no joke...this actually happened. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of61E1FesPU Does Obama look and sound and act Presidential to you?      

Which is the superior system?

I think we all can agree that our present public educational system in America is horrendous. We are slipping in world rankings, yet we spend a lot of money on each child attending public schools. (second behind Switzerland) http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/09/13/national/main838207.shtml http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/us-falls-in-world-education-rankings_n_793185.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/dec/07/world-education-rankings-maths-science-reading  So how do we fix our schools? Is more choice better? Educational vouchers allow parents the freedom to decide where funding for their child's educational career will be invested. Do they work?  Consider..........School choice, Competition, Accountability, Separation of Church and State, Robbing the poor to help the rich, race and class

Bill Clinton once said, "I did not have sex with that woman!!!" The sex he was talking about was oral sex.   We all know he at least had oral sex with Monica Lewinsky. He made the statement that oral sex was not really sex. What do you think? There are a few posters here who do not think it is sex which I find unbelievable, but not shocking coming from them.   So I would ask these questions to them and to the community here. If you think oral sex is not sex....do you care if your wife, husband, significant other was having oral sex with a friend, neighbor, stranger...for fun? Would you care if its not sex, that your children do it for fun? And if its not sex then..........could it be done publically?    

The goal of every abortionist? Human/Nonhuman? Science says what? A womans choice?