All Debates
You are browsing through all debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
In this debate, I first ban Hellno:Hellno is also well known for calling me a virgin as an insult:Once he got banned, it was WinklePicker who replied to my reply to him:http://puu.sh/sG1Ar/dfd0e78dbd.png^ click that link for context.Here's the reply on its own:Once he got banned, Slapshot used the language of WinklePicker combined with a common taunt used by Hellno to reply to me elsewhere in the debate:The message is too big to screenshot for this site's coding (it shrinks it to fit) so I have posted it to this link:http://puu.sh/sG1Fc/4ba2d779b0.pngHere is the transcript: SlapShot(2588) Disputed Banned1 pointHere's the deal, numbnuts.I don't like you.Never have.You're a smart ass little bitch.Oh...and a liar.You say you are in North Korea?Bullshit.No internet there for citizens.A very small elite few have a semi online sort of net called kwangymon. But even this is not our net that CreateDebate is on. Kwanggymon is only an intranet. All inside North Korea with no USA websites.So are you going to now admit you're a liar? And a little teenage virgin nerd bitch? Or are you gonna continue to make a fool of yourself.You fucked up when you pissed me off back last Spring.Fuck with a bull, get the horns.Have a nice day!LOLSSHere is my reply: instig8or(3239) Disputed1 pointYou're a bull huh? I'm a fucking matador.You're the SS huh? I'm Churchill.
The reason I think this war is much more interesting than the classic 1v1 is that I think these 2 houses brilliantly balance the other out. Ravenclaw's ability to form complex strategies and insanely large memory and quick recall of incantations and coutnercurses/counter-spells combined with the supreme athleticism and undisputed knowledge of herbology and many underrated studies such as charms that hufflepuff dominate will make them a powerhouse when it comes to a war that is drawn out.On the other hand, slytherins alone would probably be thwarted as they are less likely to trust each other and in a battle will be less likely to boldly bluff and make huge gambles risking their lives in order to make the enemy back off which Gryffindors are extremely well known for having little to no caution in doing. Additionally, if we combine the ability of Gryffindor to make the enemies suddenly panic in tight situations with their boldness, there's also the added intrigue of slytherins having severely good knowledge of potions and not just chemical warfare but social engineering and such.Slytherins are also very underrated in the story. It is not talked enough about how many, like Snape, had discovered their own cruel and torturous spells and such. They were the innovators of the wizarding world, this was ignored and barely mentioned at all other than the few times that innovators were found. It is true that ravenclaws innovated as well but slytherins in vented far more, especially when it came to spells themselves.So what we have here is a severe powerhouse mentally and physically versus a master manipulator and emotional abuser combo.Which will win? The raw powerhouse or the emotionally abusive gamblers?
The Hillary investigation has now shown maybe 5 foreign nations have hacked her server!
It's getting serious folks, but as we all know, the Progressive's on this site could not care less what she has done.The wikileak emails are showing that Obama was kept aware of Hillary's changing server addresses, which proves he was aware of sending emails to a private server. We all knew it would be impossible for a Boss not to now where his emails were going.Remember Nixon's Watergate, and Bill's scandals? They started out innocent enough until the investigation started digging into the truth. In the end, resignation and impeachment.Do you want to put our nation through this once again? We have a 20 TRILLION debt and have no time to waste months or years proving Clinton's crimes. If you vote for Hillary, what can I say, there is a fool born every day.She is guilty as sin! What she has done to our national security is a thousand times worse than Watergate.-FromWithin
Something not many know about me is that I'm a fantastic tournament poker player (especially if the tournament is single-table where I can watch the same people from the start to the end).That being said, I noticed that it was posted here or on facebook that Trump is a loose aggressive poker player and it is true. He bluffs/lies alot and does so aggressively/actively. Bernie Sanders is in many ways a tight aggressive poker player.Here is why Hillary is going to win the election: She knows when to lie and when not to lie. She plays people like pawns and this is how you win poker. You can't just be a bluffer or an honest by the book player. You need to bluff when you have nothing and intimidate with honesty when you do have something (unless you notice you are playing with aggressiveness, then slowplay it).