- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Men cant control themselves like that. You cant just go up to someone and say '' oh control yourself stop looking at that''' Nope wont work. Men cant control themselves like that. Many out there are very immature when it comes to something gross. For example my friends saw this book and they saw a baby touching his mother's breast. They were the only ones thinking negative. So picture it like this your a women and you have only a bra on. And later on you there and a bunch men start following you home. Later on that man might stalk you cause he might feel a certain way and cant control himself but to see your breast. Later on he goes on his plan. Women with no top equals rape
But still is it correct to kill someone who is only new to the world and you killed the baby for no reason just because you got raped. I know how it is for a women to get raped I know how hard it is and how painful it is but.... Why kill something that hasn't even set foot into the world. Also couples have babies and plan on taking abortion. They just kill the baby for no reason.
Marriage is next, it's inevitable. The opposition is fading; states have legalized it; the numbers show that more people are in favor of it than those who are not. This debate is almost over, lets not add any more fuel to the heated arguments that have been repeated time and time again. Although opponents will argue, saying that the pope okaying same-sex civil unions, doesn't mean that same-sex marriage will be next (Slippery slope fallacy), the truth is, there's more than enough sufficient evidence to prove it.
Semantics? You think this has to do with semantics? The florist is randomly picking which sins to deny her services to. That's discrimination, not sticking to her beliefs.
Last time I checked, the first amendment does not extend to England. No Americans are suing churches.
What you've said to support your position, does not bring in any weight. The opposing arguments are weighing you down, their proven facts are beyond the ground. Don't put the educators who have educated you, in a bad light. Your appreciation for them, is lacking with every ridiculous assumptions along the way. How would you have known to spell and type without them?
Teachers should, without a doubt in my mind, get paid a lot more for their involvement in educating students across the world. If their weekly wages were to increase, it would " attract the best and the brightest," and "to retain the best and the brightest." There's too many benefits to raising their pay then to not do it at all.
If you guys honestly think that a girl have to significantly impress a boy (when it's the other way around) to have sex with him, "get off your high horse," and provide proper evidence or plausible reasoning before making dumb assumptions.
The fact is, the US does not have top-quality teachers because teaching (due to low paychecks) is an undesirable profession. If we raise the paychecks and eliminate tenure, teaching will once again become a suitable profession and will therefore attract talented individuals to become teachers and thus make the country better educated
Look back at Ancient Greece; teachers and tutors were payed almost as much as religious leaders and were very respectable and therefore required higher education to beat out the competition. Because of this competetiveness, society became more educated altogether.
I totally care about Chipotle not serving guacamole because of climate changes when there are way better alternatives that are always there for everyone. The idea of the climate directly relating to the availability of the guacamole AND preventing them from coming up with a strategy to keep serving it (because the demand for the product is in the negatives), is definitely not stupid at all. /sarcasm
Although the Massachusetts court have said that 'upskirt' photos are legal, there's still a reasonable expectation of privacy for women. The law does not grant an proper excuse of severely extenuating one's "common sense," and respect for other people nearby.
I think it is a very string 'weapon' in this respect. If all major corporation took it upon themselves to lower the environmental impact they have, then the crisis will be at least 'put on hold' and then the efforts to 'fix it' will be much more successful. A company like Nutreco, who produce animal and fish feeds, are an example that I know of who invest a lot in sustainability. Being the one of the worlds largest feed producers, they not only put plans of action in place to producing it in a environmentally friendly way, but develop strategies for amelioration of the regions they work in. This is a good example of what I mean.
I think it may aid in some aspects, to form a negative image. All those bad biker boys with tattooed arms...But at the same time, this creates negativity with a certain type of people, not all. I think the body art alone is not enough to put a negative connotation, it is the type of person that wears it.
I am actually on the fence. I tend to disagree a tiny bit more because I think the things we post on our profiles shows, impassively, what kind of people we are. Although I do not think that is true always, it can show certain traits of our personalities. That may be useful for an employer to know.
About CreateDebateThe CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Sharing ToolsInvite Your Friends
RSS & XML Feeds
Basic StuffUser Agreement