- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
My point is that wildfires are beneficial. Thus successfully proving your notion of wildfires being non-beneficial false.
You've failed to explain how they are beneficial, if you actually believe that they are.
And I've already given an example of how they aren't beneficial.
You stated this in another response.
Wild fires are not beneficial....... Stay in school please
It's clear to me that you don't know what you're saying.
Due to the opposition's incoherent arguments and inability to remain consistent, ProLogos wins this battle.
Right. I pointed out a reason why wildfires aren't beneficial after you stated that they were beneficial. Then I asked a rhetorical question.
Care to tell me why you paraphrased that?
Either state what you think is wrong or right along with whatever you're quoting or paraphrasing or don't bother responding.
I'm not playing your guessing game.
You really have a hard time at comprehension. That of a child. Clearly I said wild fires are not beneficial with the "....." as to mean 'brief pause for his stupidity'. Then I stated "stay in school" meaning in school they teach you how wild fires are beneficial which he clearly implicated was not.
You attempting to abase me caused yourself to look like a complete idiot. This further supplements my notion of your cognitive abilities being that of the incompetent.
(You probably won't comprehend this but hey; some get it, some don't.)
There are a hell of a lot of people at any one time. On the one hand, this increases the chance that any one person will find a perfect match for themselves.
On the other, it increases the number of people who need nobody or have ridiculously impossible tastes, or simply could never be satisfied with a regular lover.
Only fools would think otherwise.
Behold this masterfully crafted air tight argument!
Is this how you were convinced? My guess is yes. You were bullied into your position as a child by religious and political indoctrination, now you continue this line of reasoning as an adult. I mean look how you berate those that disagree with you with insults on their persons instead of addressing their actual points. It is impossible for you to hold a discussion with someone unless they ascribe to the same cult as you. You have been robbed by your upbringing of the ability to interact with others with any sense of reason.
Religious conservatism is truly child abuse:p
About CreateDebateThe CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Sharing ToolsInvite Your Friends
RSS & XML Feeds
Basic StuffUser Agreement