CreateDebate


12335's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of 12335's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Why boys?

12335(24) Clarified
1 point

Limited freedoms? More like no freedom. At least as a citizen, shouldn't they be able to exercise their inalienable rights?

1 point

Agreeable, but do you consider prisoners citizens, or slaves?

1 point

All these little statistics saying that the population is declining is baloney. Everywhere I turn, people are pushing through each other, squeezing to get out of the way. Have you heard of traffic? Yeah... that's kinda what happens when too many people exist.

1 point

Sterilization is a bit too harsh and forceful and there has been too much controversy over it (especially in the past). I think putting a fee on 3rd children would be an acceptable solution? (Didn't mean to dispute, sorry)

1 point

Do you believe people can change? Do you think that it is simply just an American who made a mistake, and doesn't deserve to be stripped of their inalienable rights? Also, 39% of prisoners are wrongly convicted and shouldn't even be in prison. Isn't it bad enough that they are already locked up and also aren't aloud to vote?

12335(24) Clarified
1 point

I'm assuming a 2-child policy would be fair enough. Currently, the average number of children per family is about 3-4.

2 points

I was actually thinking about this yesterday, but overpopulation is a huge problem and it's not being recognized as much as it should be. If you remember taking biology, thereÅ› something called carrying capacity. Right now, humans are at an exponential growth with no limitations. Eventually we will reach the carrying capacity, like a shortage of food, or space, or change in environment (global warming), that will end up with a mass number of deaths. The problem is that America wants everyone to be happy and free to do anything they want. China, however, is on the right track.

1 point

Eh... itÅ› mainly older people using facebook nowadays :/

1 point

If you're that desperate for points, why don't you help yourself out and create a real debate? Plus I'm not going to waste my time and copy and paste useless facts for a useless subject. :)

1 point

Because calling and texting are bigger sources of communications. Communicating and posting on Facebook is optional and it's not used as much as texting and calling.

1 point

Let's be honest, Facebook just wants to look like a safe/healthy community so that their reviews can go up. On the other hand, it's kind of the person's fault for posting something personal and then claiming invasion of privacy. If they don't want their privacy to be invaded, then don't post anything in the first place?

1 point

The point deductions for the "Yes" side suggest that there is jealousy going around :0

2 points

If Billy enters his name into a website, I think he's going to live to see another day. If he inputs his social number, well thats a whole different story. :)

1 point

LOL

1 point

Then again, nobody here has the right to tell a girl what to do so there's no point in posting your arguments.

1 point

This is honestly too stupid to debate.

2 points

I didn't look at the "exhibits" because I'm too lazy, but honestly comedy has always been like this. Comedians think that making fun of people is funny. Somehow their retarded brains aren't able to think of a joke that's not disrespectful and controversial. People aren't overly sensitive, it's the comedians that are being bullies.

1 point

Is overpopulation a good idea?



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]