Right on. Nintendo isn't even that good at being a publisher either, they're a 3rd-rate publisher at best.

Nintards got it name for a reason. :\

Nintendo has nothing new, nothing innovative (the Wiimote has been done before, thank Pelican you idiots), and is not a current-gen system. Furthermore, Nintendo has ALWAYS been limiting the 3rd-party companies with their products' limited specs. While it actually takes some brains for 3rd-party companies to program the Sony's Playstation console system brands in their own time, they were far less limited.

No, it's the beginning of "Corporate Socialism..."

1. a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies.

2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, esp. as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult.

3. the object of such devotion.

4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc.

5. Sociology. a group having a sacred ideology and a set of rites centering around their sacred symbols.

6. a religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.

7. the members of such a religion or sect.

8. any system for treating human sickness that originated by a person usually claiming to have sole insight into the nature of disease, and that employs methods regarded as unorthodox or unscientific.

Since Scientology is a scam, no... since a scam cannot be a cult either.

Neither... but if I had to choose: a girl.

Well he probably doesn't like those who say the argument field must be x amount in length...

Greater stem-cell research would come from competition between private corporations, so no. Plus, why should anyone pay for something they do NOT support?

Chicken came first, the egg was still hatching.

Freezing water is impossible, what the hell you talking about?

Apple Safari is win, and this site's "Argument field Requirement" sucks.

While hilarious, if it was done to Obama instead? People would be screaming foul, period.

Bingo... an income tax in any kind does tell the population that: "the more you work, the more you must pay the government." Whereas any consumption tax tells the population to quit consuming so much which is exactly what we need to do: QUIT SPENDING.

The top 1% of America's wealth will sooner or later completely leave America so long as there is an income tax. They will leave for countries with less-intrusive tax policies.

Furthermore, income taxes penalize working people. Whereas, a federal consumption/sales tax penalizes consumption instead of working and will yet reward investments. "The more you buy, the more you spend."

They are the same... both groups support truly anti-liberal corporate socialism.

I think it would've been best if Barack Obama just slapped her. While she has every right to speak her mind, she had no right to expecting herself not to be attacked, because she put herself out there in a candidate fashion.

Should an atheist be denied the chance to become President? :\

McCain would at least be willing to say, "No!" to a child. Obama would be a diplomatic idiot even when it fails.

Who the hell is Matt Damon? Oh, some guy that is an actor... right!? And he complains about Sarah Palin not being well-known or something, right???

[/sarcasm]

Matt Damon, you got your opinion. That don't make you right.

Amazing, these actors are fearful of Sarah Palin and John McCain but couldn't care less about a terrorist group trying to establish a global Islamic theocracy.

Sure, just I would take it with a grain of salt. But then again, just because you recommend something doesn't mean I have to take your advice.

I'd rather see Stalin assassinated, he was responsible for the murder and torture of millions of his own people whereas Hitler only killed 6-8 millions at most, Jewish or not.