I think Trump is actually better than what most people think of him- the only problem with Trump is that he fails to differentiate between what's politically incorrect and what's rude, which is why he gets so much flak- I see him as a better candidate than Clinton and would preferably give him 4 years to run DC

who will debate u, who have always got the backing of IAmSparticus, or whatever his name, simple up vote and down vote and no logic, down vote this one as well, let see whether u do it or not

The number 1 issue the Republicans have is that they discuss politics in terms of viability and efficacy and not in terms of morality, which the Left uses to back its lies-look at Sanders, he does not care about what works , he cares about what's right, what's moral, so the best way to debate a guy on the left is to discuss in terms of morality, and that's what I'm doing, Cartman

You made 8 arguments and got 14 points, an indication that the guy who's up voting u and down voting me is either your 2nd CD account/ someone who's hell bent to prove socialism is a good concept- another palpable #LeftWingBullCrap

Yeah the left has taken it so aloft that it is still considered a good form of government, you see the Bernie millennials who shout raise minimum wage, 'we want wealth and income equality', and then you see Bernie's improbable plan where he says he will provide socialized healthcare by increasing the tax on the middle-class, Bernie says,' gimme 500 bucks,I give u 5000", that's what you call disingenuous

"Sorry, but you are talking about a capitalist system. Pointing out flaws in a capitalist system does not make me wrong."

Firstly you've not really pointed to any flaws, you merely said socialist/communist society is economically viable without any logical explanation.

"The last few decades CEOs have walked away with a greater percentage of money, and the workers who actually do all of the work have been getting less."

The reason why CEO's take home more money is because they run the business- it's not their entire money goes into their Bank account-percentage of it goes into other business ventures, part of it into hiring more employees, part of it is to open new avenues. ( and don't forget income tax)

If you don't have the capital and the employer, forget about the guys they are hiring for their projects

"If you can't figure out how to generate enough income to cover everyone's salaries you aren't a very good CEO."

So you are happy having a big government offering bailouts using taxpayer money, you are happy to have someone like David Cameron as PM, who says immigrant force enhances economic sustainability , while his name is linked to the Panama papers.

As for being a good CEO you have to ensure you create jobs for the workforce available and for that they get their due

Really what did Marx say ,"You earn two dollars take one and contribute one to the society" and the reason he said that was to ensure the big governments can offer their bailouts, give money to the native disenfranchised, who don't work, purely to remain in power, how is it justifiable ?

"Your argument that helping people eat is immoral then becomes false."

I've said unless you earn you can't get food, you can't put the gun on someone's head and say take one dollar and give me one so that I can have food, which is immoral.

"Being forced to find a new job is not voluntary, it is by force."

The reason why somebody has to find a new job is because his previous job is bankrupt and that serves as a penalty to big corporations who can't stay in business and willingly ask the government for bailouts.

Alright the reason why people follow the example of Denmark and her concept of free higher education, scholarships and less labor troubles, along with all her neo-liberal strategies, is because they have no idea that the US tax payers' money go to Kovenhavn to bring those benefits- Socialism works just because of their significantly less growth rate, lesser population density and because they get foreign investments from countries like UK, US and Germany

"They are human beings man. You are supposed to help your fellow man."

No doubt they are, but they would have to work to live, simply forcing a guy to take medical studies so that he can go to medical school and later provide him medicine isn't moral

"Making sure people eat is very much moral."

Really even if they don't have the money, by the way, that is what capitalism calls for "Voluntary transactions" which will give u the money

"And if you worked for that business you wouldn't have the $20 for the butcher any more. How is it moral to allow that to happen?"

Well then I've to get into another one which stays in business-again-"Voluntary transaction and consensual relationship b/w employer and employee"

You think you will win the argument by down voting every thing I say/post, try debating.....

Oh really and then the blokes who raise the $15 minimum wage argument, they are happy to put the gun

on the heads of the CEO's so that they can redistribute their due wealth which they have earned, is that moral, mate? That's called stealing, interrupting the consensual relationship between the employer and employee

Well the way people defend the concept of socialism is astonishing, especially the blokes on the left, they say" Socialism is a great idea only if it went right", what the hell,? It's just the opposite "Socialism was a bad idea that went extremely good"

I thought you're an all-time leader on this site, why not give u the moral high ground ? By the by, as far as what I've seen you seem democratic so u will have no problem defending the argument I guess

Fundamental principle of Socialism: "I'm breathing,I'm living, give me bread", what the hell, why? Right to live, Right to have bread without working for it is itself immoral; how can u argue for it ? Capitalism calls for voluntary transactions where I can go to a butcher shop and ask for a slice of bread and in return give the butcher a $20 dollar bill;

As far as economic viability, capitalism calls for limited government where there is a direct linkage between big corporations and people and if the people are dissatisfied with the quality of the products on offer, they can penalize the corporations and there would be no question of government bailouts using tax-payer money; If the business can't stay in business, it gets out

What I mean by the title of the debate is that the weapon is the choice of the murderer/mass-slaughterer but in all instances it's the radicalization and malicious-driven motive which is the real tragedy-so the Left should not have used the Orlando incident to bash the conservatives for going for lesser gun restrictions

REMEMBER: Guns don't pull trigger, it's the people who do it

After the Orlando shooting, people on the left used the incident as a device to blame the Right for going for lesser gun restrictions, now the dynamics have changed in Nice-I even heard some on the left saying the truck was "WHITE", now tell me what is that guy implying #WhitePrivilege ? We really need to address the fact that many of the Muslim clerics and Imams preach the religion in a divisive and malevolent way often highlighting more on barbarity than peace-that's the reason France had 3 terror attacks in 18 months- rather than being the #MuslimApologeticLeftWing, US should go and build the #wall

Bernie merely ran a campaign rather than actually challenging Hillary-I expected him to stand by his revolution-personally I question the veracity of many of his proposals including the $15 argument and climate change-I think he's a sellout, who swings out in the eleventh hour

Right because I believe in Limited government, I'm pro-life, I believe Capitalism is consensual sex while Socialism is rape-that is why the Right is always right

It's online radicalization as well as has a lot to do with Imams who preach the verses of Quoran in malicious way- if u ever attend any of their session you would find direct contradictions between their open speech and the verses

Progressives suck, just like Jo Cox, the deceased British MP, they are all Muslim apologetics

The attack was specifically targeted against the Hindus, Buddhists and Christians; They attacked the region where they have the foreign embassies-I.S Bangladesh has also been responsible this year for the murder of many Hindu bloggers in the country- even my state in India faces probable crisis in the future because of Dhaka and Bangladesh

For America, you need the Trump who will improve the borderline security and ban Muslims to enter the country

Well so long you own the purse, you can make the expenditure for betterment;It is about the quality and surely it is the expensive schools

Check out in YOUTUBE: "Albanian Student Shows Her Breasts, Lands News Anchor Role"

Do all the Albanian female anchors do that? I am very curious you see; how horrendous !