And we want all our money back that went to blacks on social welfare programs

The confederacy was not formed to protect slave owners, how were they to protect the slave owners in the north and border states that still had slaves. Slavery has not been abolished, look at the progressives and liberals today, they still enslave the blacks, just today they enslave them to government dependency

Now that is an outright lie. They did not rule on the Constitutionality of an issue. They even admitted that marriage is not in the Constitution, so by the Amendments to the Constitution, they could not rule on this, as it is an issue reserved to the states. So the only thing they could have looked at, is if the law in question violated a state Constitution. Since they did not do that, they did indeed legislate from the bench

In 1804, Jefferson wrote: “The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch."

His own view was that: "Nothing in the Constitution has given [the judges] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them. Both magistrates are equally independent in the sphere of action assigned to them."

Later, in retirement in1819, he wrote that: “[T]he Constitution on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.

“If this opinion [he wrote in the same 1819 letter] be sound, then indeed is our Constitution a complete felo de se [act of suicide]. For intending to establish three departments, coordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this opinion, to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation.”

Well, it’s only Jefferson, but he’s entitled to his opinion.

Animals also play with feces, you going to copy that as well

No, Gay marriage can prevented by state law. The USSC cannot tell the states what to do

No, that is not what they have done. They ignored the Constitution and forced their personal beliefs on society

That will be an act of war, so you would see the country go to armed conflict so you can allow the homosexuals to molest young boys

Like you know what any Christina thinks or follows. You are way to ignorant to know who or what Christians are

No threats, but it is people like you already using force, we are just going to reply back now.

Just stay out of our country and you people will not get hurt, pack up and leave

Who cars what you say dingleberry. You are clueless. But your ignorance makes you a threat to a civil society

Again, your opinions are worthless, you can support the immoral homosexuals all you want, you only prove that you should not be allowed near children

Kicking leftists out of the country would show that we respect the Constitution and are protecting it against those on the left

You would not be able to do anything. And I am not you buddy

They will not be recognized, nor are the states compelled to listen to the ussc, they can ignore this ruling

Did you say sometyhing. I am sorry, I did not listen to you. I think children should be seen and not heard.

abortion for birth control is murder. There is no way to see abortion as birth control as nothing but murder

Homosexuality is not normal in the human species in nature. So what are you liberals going to do now, imitate the animals and suc each other and play with your feces, oh that is what homosexuals do already

LOL, so you could not refute anything Roberts said on this rebuttal of the liberal traitors on the court. What needs to be done, is Kennedy, Kagan, Sotomayor, Beyer, and Ginsburg need to be arrested and imprisoned for what they just did

Calling your fake account the cartman is also ridiculous. You liberals are such losers

You are still wrong, the USSC has rejected using Loving for the homosexuals. Your skin color is not a choice, being a homosexual is a choice

Would bring back the homosexual laws that were overturned by unelected jurists in the Lawerence case. Would only arrest you for public indecency laws if you were out and about parading your homoness. Would not allow known homosexuals to be in the schools or around children. Basically turn back the clock until 1970

I do not use religion to express my contempt and disgust at homosexuals and their choices they make