CreateDebate


BurritoLunch's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of BurritoLunch's arguments, looking across every debate.

Police are presumed guilty before literally anything is known.

Oh shut up. You presume them innocent long after their guilt has been firmly established by the facts. You ignored two separate autopsy reports and testimony from a lung expert last week, and concluded arbitrarily that George Floyd died from a fentanyl overdose. You are such a sneering, delusional apologist for police brutality that it makes you nauseating to even engage.

Media admits Russian American soldier bounty hoax was false

Bronto posts more ridiculous far right trash backed up by literally nothing.

Brother, you are the one on here insulting others left and right

No, you insulted me. I didn't insult you. You insulted me.

You are clearly a typically brainless American narcissist who attacks people and then blames them for it!!!

AND YOU THINK SOMEONE LIKE THAT SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO OWN A GUN????

πŸ˜‚πŸ‘Œ

It would seem that you are not just a clown but the entire circus. Get off this page and go troll people on another board you buffoon. I am shocked to see that you are even allowed in here, but luckily for you, my teacher has yet to see the excrement you've been spewing on here the last few days.

You seem to have real emotional problems when someone disagrees with you.

You can use guns to hunt unlike nuclear weapons

I replied to your backwards idea that we should legalise guns because it is possible to kill someone without a gun. Could you please stick to one argument at a time and not change them every time they get debunked?

You don't need a gun to hunt. You could easily use a bow and arrow, a crossbow or even a powerful air rifle.

There's your second argument debunked. Got any more for me?

I do not understand where your point about date rape drugs even comes from.

That's because you're just not very clever.

Was Joe Biden always a bumbling moron?

When you ask questions like that after voting for Donald Trump you automatically lose all credibility.

The Israelis turned the barren, tip-head of ''THE PALESTINIAN'S PALESTINE'' into a high yielding agricultural paradise and a land of high technology

Ahahahaha! And that clearly had nothing to do with the billions of dollars of economic investment Israel received (and continues to receive). Israelis are just naturally "better" than the genetically inferior Palestinians, isn't that right buddy?

Now, where have I heard offensively ignorant beliefs like that before? It's on the tip of my tongue. I think perhaps we might have fought a war about it.

It wasn't a zinger. It was you kissing the ring of your white, liberal masters.

This is exactly what I mean. You are just bona fide crazy, Bronto. You are such a stupid, political extremist nutbag that you have to create multiple accounts just to give the false impression that anybody else on Earth is stupid enough to believe the things you write.

I'm just pointing out a possibility at this point.

Most people call it projection, which is ironic given that it's exactly what I just accused you of.

I doubt that you have any room to speak when it comes to calling out projection Burrito.

That's cool. Except no sane person cares what you doubt because everything you ever write is a paranoid conspiracy theory attacking Democrats. You're a ridiculous partisan hack with precisely zero credibility.

I would not be surprised if this serve some form of alternative agenda.

In fairness though that's mainly because you're an intellectually challenged, paranoid Q-Anon nutbag who spends his entire life projecting his own dishonesty onto Democrats.

Am I right?

You probably don't mean period. I'm sure you're for "trained units which are licensed to carry guns" keeping them.

I mean period. I don't advocate anybody having a gun outside of designated warzones. Armed police units are simply a countermeasure against a small hardcore criminal element who can and do still obtain them in spite of the law. A criminal element who would be running the country without the existence of armed police.

Shut your face please. I can sense the slime running down your chin.

Yeah? Your police go unarmed to arrest suspects with guns?

Are you literally retarded? Our suspects don't carry guns because we haven't legalised and flooded the country with them. On the rare occasions firearms are involved the police employ specialised, trained units which are licensed to carry guns.

You're just SUCH an idiot. πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

most police forces throughout the world either arm all their front line officers

No they don't you fucking idiot. You have more chance of being struck by lightning than witness a terrorist attack, you paranoid, scared little coward. I live in the UK and our front line officers don't need guns to attend domestic disturbances and traffic violations because they aren't likely to be shot in the face while making an arrest.

Great , I spied this yesterday on Netflix and enjoyed season 1 thanks for the heads up will start watching season 2 tonight

Yeah, absolutely great season. A lot better than the first, I thought. Kirsten Dunst is amazing in it. Ted Danson is in it too.

They’re brainwashed sheeple and the statements regards guns in society get more and more outrageous every day it’s actually hard to top Amarels one last week as in β€œ we are a nation of gun safety fanatics β€œ ...... how can one country produce so many idiots?

Religion and hardcore far right politics, over a period of many decades. They actually teach these people that any form of criticism is born of jealousy. That's literally what your mum tells you as a kid!!! In many ways Americans have the same level of naivety as children.

What’s truly tragic about this imbecile is that every statement he makes about the law or economics in the US is always wrong and when you correct him he invents a new narrative to fit with his updated reinterpretation

Lol. That's a precise analysis of what any conversation with him is like. Everything he ever says is absurd, and when you object to its absurdity he distorts language and reason in any way possible as an alternative to taking your point. Often he will include provocation and insults to try to elicit an emotional response from you.

I've found this to be an increasingly common pattern of behaviour on the American right, as the tethers attaching them to factual reality continue to disintegrate in the post-truth era of politics. Much of the academic reasoning behind right wing American ideology -- things like rational market theory etc... -- which supported it for so many years has collapsed under further scrutiny, and these people now have nowhere else to turn except conspiracy theories and delusion.

I’m actually convinced now you’re mentally insane

He's utterly batshit crazy. It's like I said yesterday: he's immune to factual reality.

BurritoLunch(6566) Clarified
1 point

This is pretty much the full definition of pot & kettle right here.

This is pretty much the definition of extremely salty far right moron looking for an argument about nothing.

The both of you are choosing to support one professional view, over the other.

I support the two different autopsy reports which say it was a homicide not a drug overdose.

You're an idiot.

Once again, BurritoLunch is revealing just how evident their lack of character is in this regard. Always calling someone a racist when you find that they have a differing opinion.

Differing opinion? πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

A police officer is currently on trial for killing a black man. The autopsy reports and expert testimony all confirm the officer's actions resulted in the man's death.

On the basis of literally nothing, Amarel is rejecting the autopsy reports and the expert testimony, and arbitrarily declaring the man died from a Fentanyl overdose.

That isn't "differing opinion". That's wilful rejection of the facts of this case.

If he had died alone in his apartment of fentanyl, it would be a homicide you ignorant fuck.

Ahahahahaha!!! πŸ˜‚πŸ‘Œ

Homicide: the killing of one person by another.

https://www.google.com/search?q=define:homicide

Make note to self. Must learn difference between homicide and drug overdose.

Because right wing individuals, don't typically hate, or even dislike medicare.

Roflmao. πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Of course they ruled it a homicide.

So stop talking about Fentanyl you fucking idiot.

But that doesn't mean what you're pretending it means.

It means he didn't die from ingesting drugs you pathetically stupid fucking fool.

The official autopsy was the first one done by the states medical examiner.

Who also ruled it a homicide, not a Fentanyl overdose.

Why are you so wilfully dishonest, Amarel?

That's the original source we have access to. That's the one you're ignoring.

Ignoring it? It fucking well agrees with me!!! It rules the death a homicide, not a drug overdose. You are:-

A) Ignoring that it disagrees with you.

B) Ignoring that the State Medical Examiner might not be the most reliable source in an investigation into state culpability for a civilian death.

I'll give it to you plain and simple Amarel. You are an obnoxiously dishonest, thoroughly offensive, spineless little racist halfwit.


1 of 442 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]