CreateDebate


Cartman's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Cartman's arguments, looking across every debate.
Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Just an FYI, if someone serves as president for more than 2 years of a term they can only be reelected once. Pence would have to serve less than 10 years.

1 point

Maybe you should use the personal income statistics for the debate about corporations paying workers instead of the payment statistics the federal government paid out for social security.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal incomeintheUnited_States

You might notice that wages and productivity used to increase together and now productivity goes up, but wages don't.

1 point

I live in America and it is not true for America. We cut taxes with Reagan in office and ever since wages have stagnated.

1 point

Because when companies have excess, only then do they give bonuses, give raises, hire new people, and not have layoffs. If they have any financial doubt, they do none of the above.

Unfortunately, that's not true. :( I wish it was.

t also makes companies want to stay or come to America rather than Mexico or China, etc.

Fair enough.

Still only addressing why we shouldn't raise taxes though.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

The half that he didn't say is the thing you are claiming he said. You aren't claiming he said the other half.

1 point

He only said half of that. Do you understand that?

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Yes, he never said every working person should be paid the exact same amount. Now you can't read and you can't listen. Congratulations.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Obama didn't say it ?

Correct. Obama never said what you claim he said. You have never once accurately described what Obama has said. He has said some pretty stupid things that are ready to attack, yet you choose to say something incredibly stupid and attribute it to him.

Moonbeam you mean to tell me the Obama Archives are lying ?

No, I already explained this. You are illiterate.

1 point

will destroy society

Correction: would have destroyed society

Women aren't second class citizens now. Get with the times.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

You are talking about it, not Obama. Read your source. It doesn't say what you claim it says.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

It satisfies me greatly. It shows you have no idea what you are talking about.

1 point

Well, that's something we can agree on.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Your "Boy King" spewed it

Source?

1 point

Instead of telling me the news sources you like one at a time, just give them all to me right now.

1 point

"Can I only take as much as I contribute?"

That's what I was talking about.

Equal access doesn't really mean anything. Having access doesn't mean you get to take from it.

1 point

Ok, so you trust the N.Y. post and the Washington Times. What's next? Huffpo?

1 point

No. That was you. You ignored the model described. The model described said you get what you contribute, not everything equal.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Actually the basis of my argument is what people basically are.

And that's completely different than the debate description. That's the point I was making.

You are probably right with your assessment of communism.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

I want you to post from the sources that you trust.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

You are the one who disagrees with facts based on the news source. You projecting your hatred of facts on me doesn't change that. I am trying to figure out your news preference. I bring you articles from the Washington Times and you tell me it is fake news, then you bring news from Washington Times and say it is true. If I bring you a Washington Times article will you admit it is true?

1 point

So, you don't like the Washington Times unless it fits your narrative. Your idea of fake news involves anything liberal. You just like being misinformed. It's sad really. Being misinformed on a debate website is not the way to go.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

That's called a complete failure. You are a complete failure.

1 point

So, is it ok to use the Washington Times when disputing you in the future? Is that a news source you trust?

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Even in your stupid analogy you admit he failed. You are a failure at showing you're not a failure.


2 of 977 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]