Hmm... That's a different way to look at it... But it's not what I'm saying. Most likely, the reason one will go to Theistic Evolution is because they accept Evolution as unfalsifiable. Now, this is not "God getting involved and making Evolution seem unfalsifiable." This is a person believing all the things people tell them and believing that it has been proven without a shadow of a doubt.
SLAVERY
This page gives a pretty good in context description of the slavery going on.
KILLING SOMEONE FOR BEING HELPFUL
I'm pretty sure what's actually happening here is God teaching people to have faith in Him. He wouldn't let the Ark of His Covenant fall to the ground. Just because the oxen stumbled doesn't mean God would have. Also, I'm not even sure of what's falling in this passage; Uzzah could be falling and take hold of the Ark to steady himself. If so, he could have grabbed on to many other things, and did not have to grab the Ark.
I am gonna get off for a while, but I will come back and finish the list later.
Thank you for your clarification! However, I want to clarify that I do not believe that a gene makes a person prone to either. You are completely correct in your logic, however that logic is based upon the assumption that there is a gene determines sexuality.
Matthew 13: 24-30 gives a pretty good description of what's going on in most of this. Besides, there's no evidence of Him directly saying "Yeah, you can go rape people; you know, burn some witches too. Oh, and while you're at it, why don't you enslave some people?"
You didn't understand what I was saying, but that's not your fault, as I've worded my previous dispute incorrectly. Unfalsifiable, yes. However, if one believes in Theistic Evolution, one believes both of the components to be unfalsifiable.
Now, I understand what you are saying here. However, I want to clear a few things up. I know Lilmisfit is well-educated. I just don't like it when people claim that God is cruel, when there's a reason behind all He does. Also, for a second, I forgot we weren't arguing about whether or not God exists. Sorry about that.
Now, about my use of the term subjective. I just see people always count off subjective evidence in God v. No-God debates, asking for objective evidence. I always accept subjective evidence, but I take it subjectively, while pairing it with what I know and what God shows me.
Thank you, zephyr20x6, for your input! It was insightful.
I'm gonna step into the den of the troll here. You've no idea what you're talking about. Obviously, God has a physical brain(in the form of Jesus). However, God's other two components(The Father and The Holy Spirt) are beyond my comprehension and I am unable to say what they look like. However, I do know that God does love every single one of us.
You're exactly right. Zoophiles can be good people. According to the logic that there is a gene that makes people homosexual, well there must be a gene to make someone a zoophile.
NOTE: I support neither. I just want to point out how stupid it is to support one and not the other. Love is love, right?
This page as well as many others will show you my evidence. Just look it up.
Also, you seem to not understand free-will entirely. Or omniscience. To say that only one could exist is silly. That's forgivable, though, 'cos you're not omniscient. Yes, we do have free-will. However, there's only one possible outcome(one that is too complicated for us to figure out).