It's the age old moral dilemma. do you give such childlike people a fish or a fishing rod?
The problem here is that they'd probably eat the fishing rod, or try to adapt it as weapon with which to engage in tribal warfare.
Of course it is only but right and fitting that nations which suffer occasional crop failure or experience other natural disasters are supported by the international community.
In the case of some African nations however such donations are a total waste of money and are in direct conflict with nature's laws of natural selection.
Keeping these sub-groups artificially alive is only extending their pain and agony, and as the rest of the world advances into the age of advanced technology, they are progressively looked upon as mindless freaks wandering helplessly in a daze through the deserts and infertile parts of Africa most of which is a fruitful and wealthy continent that could support 100s of millions of people if it was populated by intelligent, hard working, self supporting people.
He'll certainly be remembered as the President who gave the old school of the political elite a kick up the rear-end and jolted them into the world of reality.
He relegated the glitzy razz-a-ma-tazz, the balloons, the brass bands and all the phony speeches well down the priority list and presented the people with the uncomfortable facts in plain, matter-of-fact English.
He put America's trading partners on notice that;- the game is up, THE PLAYING FIELD IS BEING LEVELLED.
PRESIDENT TRUMP IS, THE THE RIGHT MAN, IN THE RIGHT PLACE, AT THE RIGHT TIME.
It is a shame that there are so many loony lefties who are incapable of recognizing this self-evident truth.
It is important to know that every negative occurrence in the world is the fault of Donald Trump.
For a couple of instances, the loony left would have us believe that the on going sewage problem in Burundi, to Wee Mrs. Mc Dooky's cat getting run over on the road between Atriclave and Limavady are a direct consequence of President Trump's immigration policy.
Numerous V.I.Ps, including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Donald Trump have attended various dolly bird embellished gatherings but it's President Trump the loony left filth have singled out for their, predictable scurrilous attacks.
The Democrat's fathomless vindictiveness belies the old adage;- hell hath no fury like a women scorned.
The only positive feature about their endless torrent of unfounded, vindictive accusations against President Trump is that it makes them a laughing stock in the eyes of the entire world.
Researched it for you.
Apparently he was on suicide watch up until recently.
Also, his social events! were attended by by such V.I.Ps as Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Donald Trump as well as countless other big-wigs.
So, think about this;- ''dead men tell no tales''.
He is absolutely 100% correct.
The Democrats lazily rely on their outdated, overused warcry of;- ''racism'' at almost everything President Trump tries to achieve for the welfare and advancement of the nation.
You can almost hear them discussing their game plan at their strategy meetings.
Hey, President trump has reduced the influx of illegal immigrants. How will we respond?
Shout Racist
Hey, President Trump has told China that the game's up with their one sided trade deal. How do we counter that?
Eh, shout racist.
President Trump has told Europe they will have to pay more towards the cost of their own protection and not to rely so heavily on America. How do we counter that?
Eh, we'll have to think of a really good original come-back on that one.
Em, ah, shout racism.
If ex=President Inertia Obama had had the political courage and moral fibre to address the contentious issues which are causing so much civil unrest and national disunity at this time the problems would be significantly less in both number and severity.
No, best to let the epidemic run its course.
This is what the Lord Mayor of London did and he elevated the British Metropolis to the knife Capital of the world, even better than New York.
If we let the tribal instincts of the Bongo continue without interference they will reduce their population by natural selection, or perhaps that should read natural deselection.
Well, you may not have seen The Democrat's Book of Dirty Tricks but you sound like the sort of guy who spends a lot of time ogling Dirty Books and stealing undergarments off clothes lines.
Godless, brainless shameless communist filth such as you have to suppress freedom of religious and political expression for fear of being ousted from your position of tyrannical dictatorship by the truth contained in the word of God.
No, can't say that I have noticed that.
But I have noticed that the Loony Left progressives do not accept the result of a democratically run election and try every dirty trick in the book to overturn the people of America their democratic rights.
Globally the loony left see God as a challenge to their totalitarian political agenda.
I fully agree with your sentiments on the range of issues you listed.
I am suggesting that the warring factions should try to find some common ground and publicly, accentuate their areas of agreement in an atmosphere of harmony and camaraderie.
The nation is pulling itself apart and in the process countless innocent people, young and old are being slaughtered over ideologies which could be temporarily placed well down the priority list until some semblance of national unity is achieved.
Thanks for your reply but I cannot agree with the premise that there is a correlation between an assassin who buys a gun, the principle function of which is to kill and an irresponsible driver whose recklessness results in death.
The assassin bought a gun specifically to kill someone with a weapon the sole purpose of which is to commit murder.
The driver didn't intend to kill anyone and his vehicle wasn't designed as a weapon.
The outcome of both scenarios result in death but, generally speaking one was cold blooded murder (like intentional abortion) while the other is accidental ( like unintentional miscarriage, say by falling down a flight of stairs) .
I trust you can recognise the wide difference between the two, very separate issues.
Well, Muslim terrorists tend to favour bombs but throughout history the warring tribes/clans and nations of the world have been most ingenious in developing a mind boggling array of weapons with which to slaughter each other.
Of course the point you're making is that it isn't weapons which kill, but the operators who use them.
Well, this is, in many ways a reasonable supposition except that in America, where gun availability/ownership is the greatest in the western world also has the highest rates of mass-shootings in the world.
I feel that anyone who considers this issue dispassionately should be able to see the correlation.
You're not comparing like with like.
Essentially a gun is a devise specifically designed and manufactured to kill.
Okay, we'll hear from the smart Alecs about game hunting, target shooting and the likes but nevertheless a gun's main function is to kill.
Motorized vehicles are manufactured and marketed as a means of transport and are designed to minimize the risk of death or serious injury in the event of an ACCIDENT.
Private and commercial vehicles are essential in today's world to transport all types of goods including food stuffs and vital medicines as well as conveying sick people to hospitals.
Guns are not an essential part of the average person's lifestyle
I trust you can see the difference.
That is a very good and stimulating thread.
A definitive explanation would be difficult but I feel it's worth trying to examine some of the possibilities.
With the U.S.A., pretty much the world's dominant military and industrial power no nation has openly declared war on us since WW2.
There has been no serious common enemy for the nation to unite against so the domestic political disputes are perceived by many as a form of warfare.
The political rhetoric between the two main parties has become more vicious and this combined with the genuine fear created by the endless stream of illegal immigrants has polarized large sections of the nation.
The serious problems which the extreme elements of both the radical left and the extreme right are causing needs to be addressed urgently with the strong personalities of both the major parties being seen together reconciling their differences and presenting themselves *as one united voice in a spirit of compromise and goodwill.
THE CONTINUING GREATNESS OF THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA IS BIGGER, AND SIGNIFICANTLY MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE CURRENT ''HERE TODAY, GONE TOMORROW EGOTISTICAL POLITICIANS'' AND THEIR PERSONAL VENDETTAS.
