This is my only other account that I use when I feel that I was unjustly banned from a debate.

I would use my main account except that you banned me before I even said anything

I think it is sadder when people think voting can actually change the reason or lack of, within a argument.

P.S. what kinda of intolerant person bans people before they even posted their first argument.

That did not even respond to the point I made. You are not debating, you are just trying to suppress anyone who questions your beliefs.

"So instead of simply going about the "you are wrong, i am right" path, how about you respond to my argument with specific counterpoints."

You are hurting you own side through your inability to respond to reasonable objections to your statements.

Typical fanatic.

But the argument is not involving the legality of adoption or parenting. The argument is solely based on the legality of abortion. You support abortion being legal and thus you are pro-abortion

Rights are subjective. Someone might see it as a right to stone their wifes I they cheat on them, it does not mean the society should condone such behavior.

Do support the choice for driving drunk?

As electives sure, but not at core required courses.

Sure I would believe Andy, but until than, it is kinda hard to discount what is right in front of me.

Well, it would help if you could point out the flaws with the photo, because I am not seeing any.

I never said anything about you. I just commented on the picture. That is not slander, just as observation.

I can't see any clear signs of tampering, so this looks like a legitimate screen grab

There is a difference between responding to a rumor reasonably and proclaiming "Ill call the FBI". I get that you do not like the insult, but you are over reacting.

You have no authority to deem what is official or what is not, since you have no authority whatsoever

While mould prefer no ruler, littlemisfit would still be a better choice than the tyrant that is CHAFFY

No, because they are not. That does not mean they should not be held accountable for their actions, just that it should be recognized that they are still learning to make good choices.

LONG LIVE WARDOGNINJA

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DOWN WITH CHAFFY!!!!!

JOIN THE REVOLUTION!

BRING AN END TO THE REIGN OF THIS TYRANT!!

DEFIANCE!!!!

Proving you wrong is not a solid basis for being banned

You are right, you have the right to believe whatever you want to God. But that is limited to your personal beliefs. You can not redefine a religious term such as Christian to suit your own beliefs.

No matter who wrote the new testament, it is what led to the creation of Christianity, so to say you support the idea of the Christian God, without giving recognition to the basis for Christianity itself is incredibly naive.

P.S. Just because you ban people doesn't make them any less right, or you any less wrong.

True, a fetutus life-ness might be considered not trully alive, but an interesting thing about defining something as alive is that they must go though the basic life processes, including reproduction. Since abortion is interfering with the natural act of reproduction, abortion is going against part of what makes us alive.

I think it is ignoring the betrayal of the natives by the settlers.

While there are benifits to TV, i think books are better overal for learning as they require more focus.