In other words, we could do without the military and police if people weren’t human. But since they are, we need to have institutions of of the worst criminals in the world...
I wouldn't say humans need to not be humans, they just need to be very different humans. I know you of all people will not accept this but there really is no reason that humans behave the way they do other than conditioning from the conditions of their environment. The thief steals because he does not have, the Rothschild grubs money because he was raised by money grubbers, the soldier kills because he was told that murder is okay as long as you murder the "bad guys". The "bad guys" where told that our guys are the bad guys, but the real bad guys are the politicians and bankers who start the wars and convince people to kill for them. All governments are evil and all militaries are the right hand of evil. We are nothing but primitive hairy apes fighting over land and resources, believing that we are fighting for justice, humans fail to see that these wars are pointless and counter productive. We fight for our country, our tribe, our pack etc. rather than working together as one species, and that is why humans can't be called "civilized".
Conjecture. And doesn't prove your point in any way.
How so? Most people aren't geniuses, most people disagree with geniuses about everything and their opinions are the opposite of geniuses. This couldn't be any more obvious, but as a common fool it's no surprise you don't get it. Let me simplify this for you, pop music is more popular than classical music because most people are stupid and not intellectual, voting for idiots is more common than trying to meaningfully change the system because most people are stupid and not intellectual, and the character traits of geniuses are the opposite of those that are exhibited by celebrities like Kim Kardashian and Donald Trump.
It created the richest, most powerful civilization in the history of planet Earth with a GDP of $20 trillion.
Translation: It created the greediest, most destructive and violent civilization in the history of planet earth with a made up number of social construct points which the federal reserve pulls from it's rectum.
The genius who can't figure out how to make enough money to buy a sandwich
I know exactly how to make a lot of money in a capitalist society. You either have to be gay and stupid enough to appeal to the masses in media, or greedy enough to excel in business and jewry (banking).
It's certainly true, we only need military because other countries have militaries and other countries exist. If humanity acted as one civilization rather than a series of competing nations we wouldn't need a military. We only need police and jails and laws because we haven't developed a scientific approach to altering, preventing and predicting destructive behaviour or learned to establish and instill a logical basis for socially productive behaviour rather than programming people with social constructs and subjective morality that can easily be dismissed when one sees more reward involved with dismissing it and thinks they can get away with it. To put it simply it is logical for humans to behave in a mutually beneficial way, but only if it is mutual, and in our current social structure you are actually encouraged to fuck people over because your livelihood depends on your ability to convince people to give you money rather than your true merit or productivity.
Yes, let's ban guns for everyone except the people who use them in the worst ways possible, the government and criminals. You see, when you ban guns, that stop citizens from getting them legally, but it doesn't stop criminals from getting them illegally. Nor does it stop the biggest criminals on earth, police and military, from getting guns.
People sometimes tell me that white western culture is responsible for destroying the earth but europeans where always earth loving pagans before the middle eastern, semitic cultural influence which started seeping into europe around the time of the roman empire has introduced the attitude into white culture that the earth is nothing but an inexpendible bag of resources that we can just take and take from, treating all other life as if it is our bitch. This attitude is brought to us by a christian worldview which reflects the sinister and greedy nature of the jews and sand niggers who brought it to us.
@Antrim
Is it so wrong to make the distinction between judaism the religion and the ethnic group known as "ashkenazi jews" who are actually white people who associate themselves with a religion which was designed around hebrew values and culture, and says specifically that hebrews are gods chosen people rather than ashkenazi white people who's ancestors converted to judaism? It's pointless to even call yourself a jew when you are a white atheist and the fact that there are ethnic groups that call themselves "jews" doesn't actually make them jews technically. A jew is a hebrew that believes in judaism.
The difference between marxist communism and stalinist communism is that Stalin centralizes the means of production in the hands of the state whereas Marx wanted to collectivize the means of production as the common heritage of all the earths people.
A common cause.
I agree, the common cause should be to exterminate the jews.
Humans need that like they need water!
The jews don't, they aren't humans.
A NEW Misiah.
I disagree there. That's what the jews said. "we don't like jesus, we need a new messsieah."
Yes his is the he POST HUMAN era.
Soon the humans will be replaced by a superhuman race known as "uber-menchin" The old law has run out of relevance
It's time to rape the jews with a cactus in their butt holes
You mean "won".
Yes, obviously. Sometimes my brain does that when I am replying to something so stupid and thus not even paying attention due to the obviousness of what I'm typing.
Nope. I'd prefer to not be pro Islam socialists trying to demonize Russia and Jews at every turn..
What exactly makes muslims so much worse than russians and jews?
I didn't mention free market economics.
But you believe in it. Are you aware that it's just a theory that hasn't even been put into practice before?
I mentioned the theoretical utopian, no borders, no nations, no family, no religion happy world end result according to Marxism.
Yes and I mentioned the utopian, reclusive, no nations, every family for themselves, anarcho-capitalistic scenario that would be a free market if such a thing ever existed.
And yet, you are persistent that we need to move to Marx's fictional "utopia"
Yes yes and you wish the Nazis one world war 2 and you where living in national socialist paradise so what are you buggering on about?
Free market economics is not a scientific theory, and is based on wishful hopes and faith.
@Outlaw
The point is, everything in science, economics, and politics is based in theory. The word "theory" doesn't imply that something is incorrect, nor does it imply that it is correct. It implies that it is an idea which is supported by some form of evidence. You are an absolute dumb ass, you missed the point entirely and you think america has a free market economic system.