CreateDebate


Factocracy's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Factocracy's arguments, looking across every debate.
2 points

I already know you're a right winger Mingi. I also know that you care more about how mean or brutal someone's language overtly is than the disinformation being spread by right wingers and that you're too stupid to realize that many dangerous people will never admit how dangerous they are whereas relatively harmless people might say things that are extreme but only leave it as words.

1 point

All you have to do is decide to baselessly adopt a ludicrous belief system on pure faith, and you can be promised eternal life after death that there is no proof is waiting for you.

1 point

I still love you honey. I'm not perfect either, and hat is why I need Jesus.

In other words your imperfection is why you believe in Jesus. This is very true but not for the reasons you think. But hey, it's not that I'm perfect or that I know everything, it's just that I am closer to being perfect and know more.

1 point

Why are you bringing up your past? .

1 point

No, whether he does it or not is the most relevant part because you're accusing him of THREATENING people you deceptive little weasel.

0 points

Exactly, you are too retarded to even entertain the notion that anything other than what you believe is true, and that is why you will never grow as a person or overcome your own objective stupidity. You spew things that are objectively and verifiably wrong and won't let anyone assist you in not being such a hateful little retard.

Factocracy(346) Clarified
1 point

FromWithin is so fucking stupid that he's beyond any sense, and he deserves no respect whatsoever because he literally thinks anyone who disagrees with him is a "fool" and a "liar" and won't give any human being who happens to smarter than him the time of day. He exists for the sole purpose of being stupid and disrespecting smart people, and this is an example of who you think Nom is a "sociopath" for treating them like the shit that they are.

1 point

For anyone curious viewing this later, he didn't accept the deal and continued to make egregious threats which are intended to scare me out of using my first amendment rights.

Factocracy(346) Clarified
1 point

In truth if you came after me nothing would happen except that I would know who to hold a grudge against. You talk so big and think you know it all but apparently Sun Tzu didn't get through to you about underestimating your enemy. I am physically and mentally superior to you in numerous ways, and there is so much you fail to understand about me. I seriously will never do anything to you unless you make me, at which time I will use all the tactics that you think I can't and stop at nothing until your life is ruined without me even having to do anything illegal. I will cut you a deal here and now, I will never speak or type a word to you again unless you approach me first, but if you approach me first I will speak however I want and stop at nothing until you are reduced to the lowest possible state if it ever goes beyond words.

Factocracy(346) Clarified
1 point

I am responding to your legal threats by telling you you'd better not so much as attempt to do anything to me or the things you perceive as threats which are not will be replaced by the real danger of having everything backfire in your face. I will dare to talk to you however I fucking want to because you are a pathetic rat who will run to the law with crocodile tears just to fuck someone over that you don't like. You are truly a snake, a weasel and a cockroach and I will not back off like the law abiding bitch you want me to be, I will use whatever tactics I deem most practicable to fuck you over ten thousand times worse than you have ever been fucked in your life.

2 points

Do not doubt that this will add to the lawsuit.

Legal threats again is it?

1 point

I don't need sources, I simply need to realize the fact that the sources that oppose me are in an ideological war with the ones they accuse of being responsible for everything bad under the sun, and are in fact the ones supporting the status quo of capitalism which is the equivalent of being a counter-revolutionary who supports the monarchy during the french revolution.

1 point

Exactly, you are simply believing that the USSR killed as many people as their biggest enemies said they did. The numbers are bullshit and are literally based on blaming every single death that happens on communism. Every single person who died in the US this year was directly murdered by capitalism.

1 point

The murder is precisely the biggest lie of them all. The USSR is guilty of less murder than the US.

0 points

The USSR has been demonized and defamed far beyond what is based in reality and China was never truly socialist.

Factocracy(346) Clarified
2 points

Number one the first paragraph is pure arrogance and dishonesty and number two the latter statement is disproven by the fact that socialist countries only "stagnate" when they are no longer socialist or they have been hit with sanctions and threats from capitalists.

Factocracy(346) Clarified
0 points

You literally don't know anything about it, it's laughable to see you declaring things like this. Of course some things about it might be seen as "evil" to type 0 people, and of course it seems very cold and alien to humanity, but ultimately it is the truly optimal way and the only way to max out all potential. There must be no bullshit, society must be run by pure reason with the objective of maxing out and "leveling up" everything there is to level up rather than run by meaningless irrational socially constructed crap which was literally made up by primitive apes with the intention of mediating their primitive monkey bollocks.

0 points

There will be people left behind, in the dust, in my optimal society.

You seem to be contradicting yourself. You essentially are saying originally that an ideal society is one that coddles the weak and allows the privileged to be handed everything, and now you are trying to say it is a meritocracy. On top of that, how will you create such a society with a capitalist welfare state, it is oxymoronic. You will create the exact opposite because like I already have proven countless times capitalism is not a meritocracy.

The severely disabled will be what you bring up and I will just say that what would happen would be merciful to all parties involved based on consent of the family and/or close friends.

Kind of sounds like you're alluding to eugenics.

0 points

You're objectively stupid for saying such things. Never once have I actually advocated machines ruling anything.

1 point

Define "optimal". It is only optimal in a very lazy way of looking at it, not in a literal optimal sense of maxing out the potential of everything. Your "optimal" society is one where there are still many arbitrary or artificial things that hold people back and it is acceptable for humanity to not be optimized at all as long as no one is left in the dust or abused.

1 point

Name one person who is at the absolute top who is not part of an Illuminati bloodline. I mean higher than Bill Gates because there are some on that level who can make it from a low point (although Gates is related too) I am talking Rothschild level people. It is possible to become super rich after growing up in poverty (although it's extremely rare and requires both luck and border-line genius intelligence) but it is literally impossible to be "elite" without at least some connection and almost all one percenters are related and literally everyone in the 0.50 % is Illuminati.


1 of 15 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]