Her debate title was fallacious and blatantly broke it on multiple occasions: at least 2
Libprolifer:
I banned him by accident. How do I fix that? .
Me:
You've banned two already! and one of them was one who commented on the fact that you've broken your title... I don't think it was an accident: "There are no accidents" ~ Master Oogway
Overall her ability to maintain a statement of what she said she would do/ implied she would do is clearly false, showing her arrogance/stupidity (as they walk hand in hand)
1. Simplify the tax code. A flat tax rate.
2. Entitlement reform. Government employed doctors certify who is really unable to do any kind of work. Those recipients of welfare who can work must work to receive benefits.
4. End the war on drugs.
5. Eliminate deficit spending. Take Georgia for an example: implement a balanced budget law - constitutional amendment maybe?
6. Put an end gerrymandering.
7. Eliminate the US D.o.Edu.
8. Remove DOT and leave coordinating to the States.
I believe that in most cases applying this principle will result in a satisfactory, correct answer. This would apply to much of life, like everyday things (see GenericName's argument), but not to all of life, such as politics, romance, religion, etc. where it is common to have red herrings and other such objects of misdirection or interpretive implications.
They should not because during that time period the way everyone's country made their money was by conquering other people and taking their stuff. That is why it is called an empire. The Spanish and others who came over were doing the same thing the Aztecs/Incans/etc. did themselves: conquer. The whole killed 90% of the population via disease thing was unintentional. The spread of small pox was actually spread by the pigs they brought over because we know they carry disease and reproduce like crazy. Overall they are not criminals because they are just doing the same thing they were doing amongst themselves.
The right is the right to the freedom of speech not what you said. It doesn't matter whether it is insulting or not it is legal. The whole point of making that write was to ensure you had the right to speak your mind however if you say something that gets you in trouble you have to take personal responsibility for your actions.
No not necessarily, you can be just calling it the way it is.
However it can be said in an insulting manor even when stating fact.
So in all actuality this can go either way and is more of a gray area (non-specific) and should have been put as a perspectives debate.
One should remain abstinent until marriage that way you can have your child(s) (or not) with no worry that your partner will leave you or that he/she were just trying to have sex with you. Staying a virgin until marriage also helps to keep clear of HIV/AIDS.
You appeal is based on how your personality coexist with someone else's personality. If you personality is one they real like then your appeal grows. Also I would personally say that as you success grows how desirable you are increases as the are many opportunists out there no matter what you gender may be.
