CreateDebate


Hootie's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Hootie's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Hello Hater and non reading antisemite

Will you please stop accusing everybody who disagrees with you about anything related to Jews of being an anti-semite. It's literally so stupid.

1 point

What the fuck is going, on? Have you been, shrooming?

I never shroom on a full stomach.

How are you dear?

1 point

The NY Post is not a credible news source. It is a far right propaganda factory run by none other than Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News.

The fact that you continuously read and link extreme far right propaganda discredits everything that you ever say:-

Since Murdoch took over the paper, The Post has been known for its over-the-top sensational headlines.

Editorially, The Post has endorsed the Republican Presidential Candidate in every race since 1980.

According to an LA Times article, the New York Post is reported to be U.S. President Donald Trump’s preferred newspaper.

The Post, According to a survey conducted by Pace University in 2004, was rated the least-credible major news outlet in New York.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

You are a truly comical person Amarel. You are corrupt, dishonest and disingenuous down to your very last fibre of being. You are more like a cartoon villain than a real human being.

Hootie(364) Clarified
1 point

Yur mad because I pointed out your stupid comment, but not someone else's?

Not mad. I'm puzzled that you don't/can't comprehend sarcasm, assume all language to be literal and that you purposefully ignore all relevant context which negates the need to make sneering remarks.

I am afraid the simple fact of the matter is that you are a stupid, racist, partisan idiot with absolutely raging double standards and a mirthless contempt for factual reality.

2 points

Guns are much more widely used for hunting and sport in the US.

Absolute pitiful rubbish. You are truly not in a winning position when you refuse to acknowledge the reason for the existence of guns.

1 point

Nice going implying that all guns do is kill people and that there's no other application of guns. No hunting

Guns kill things you jaw-dropping idiot. That's literally the only reason they exist. Cars were invented to transport things. Guns were invented to kill things.

0 points

Car accidents and the deliberate striking of pedestrians wouldn't be possible without cars.

Neither would it be possible for the entire country's workforce to get to their jobs in the morning. You predictably left that part out. If all cars did was kill people they might be comparable to guns.

1 point

Ah, the Eurocentrist circlejerk has arrived. I don't expect either of you to understand why trying to disarm 72 million Americans

Oh Jesus Christ you're just so goddamned stupid. Nobody has any intention of "trying to disarm 72 million Americans" you literal idiot. That isn't how it works. Banning guns makes gun ownership illegal. If you own a gun after that date and you get caught you'll go to jail, exactly like you would for any other crime.

What you stupid clowns love to do is throw out objections based entirely on your own false reasoning.

1 point

By that erroneous reasoning, rich people don't commit crimes

I literally replied to a dude who said there'd be no cops if Democrats had their own country, so judging from your ludicrous double standard you must be a Republican.

3 points

your back to trolling.

I'd point out that you're stupid and can't spell basic words, but I'm familiar with your general response of turning everything you read upside down, just like the unfathomable idiot you are.

1 point

A cop caught doing that would not only lose his job, but would lose his career in law enforcement.

Good one, halfwit. Any person caught raping another would not only lose his job, but would also lose his freedom. Therefore rape doesn't happen. More faultless logic from our resident fruitcake. πŸ˜‚πŸ‘Œ

1 point

You'd soon be living in a copless, gunless world

And a crimeless world, since the resources would be shared more equally and poverty would be greatly reduced.

1 point

I'd quit and let them defend their own property and selves without guns just as they demanded.

Nobody asked you Bronto. You were banned for abusing the site.

1 point

It's unacceptable for police to make personal visits to "check their thinking", enforce hate speech laws, or enforce lockdowns; they violate fundamental human rights.

Protecting your life from a dangerous pathogen is not a violation of your "fundamental human rights" you child.

Hootie(364) Clarified
1 point

I suppose I should ask all the voting right wingers if their votes actually reflect their preferences...oh wait, that would be very stupid.

You are talking about reds who are already living in blue states!!! If they are perfectly happy to live in a blue state now, then why would they suddenly become unhappy if the blue state becomes a blue country? They'd be free to move just like they are free to move right now. Nothing would change for them.

Please get it through your goddamned head that making up somebody else's mind for them without asking them is ALWAYS stupid.

1 point

The red counties in those states wouldn't accept it.

I've noticed that most of the things you write involve you telling us what somebody else thinks, wants, or would accept. Always without ever asking them first. Very stupid.

1 point

In democracy the unintelligent (the majority) make laws that the brilliant (minority) must live by.

I have to admit this is true in theory. But at the same time, fascism isn't to be confused with meritocracy. It isn't the brilliant who make the decisions in a fascist society. Furthermore, democracy isn't to be confused with the systems in place in the west. These are representative democracies, which themselves are arguably closer to fascism than actual democracy.

1 point

I couldn't care less if you want to pretend I'm an American Nazi.

Nobody is pretending. You are using speech which makes it very clear that you are on the extreme far right.

I'm a classical liberal/libertarian Brit.

πŸ˜‚ So you're using American political terminology while you simultaneously pretend to be British? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ You are so stupid I don't even know how to begin explaining it to you.

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.

Deliberately taking CS Lewis quotes out of context is not a good reason to let millions of people die. What is actually wrong with you? Did your mother drop you on the head as a baby? Where is this "tyranny" you speak of?

The mortality rate in the UK has been as high as it was in 2020 for every single year before 2003.

False. Just like everything else you ever claim.

The UK experienced unprecedented levels of excess mortality during the spring of 2020 and again in the autumn and winter of 2020 and 2021, reflecting the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK so far.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/comparisonsofallcausemortalitybetweeneuropeancountriesandregions/2020

And covid has a 0.128% mortality rate

Also false. As the graph below shows, the Covid mortality rate (i.e. I presume you actually mean fatality rate) has risen as high as 15 percent in Italy, 12 percent in Sweden and Spain, and over the entire globe to 7 percent:-

https://ourworldindata.org/mortality-risk-covid

You literally don't have the first idea what you are talking about. You are an extreme far right white nationalist retard with a big mouth and a political agenda.

1 point

He’s the same cock sucker who several years ago on here claimed he co-authored a scientific paper on red shift

πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Amarel is very plainly a delusional person who lacks the intellectual depth to get past his own feelings of self-importance. He could keep a psychiatrist in work for at least two years.

Hootie(364) Clarified
1 point

Here we love free markets and free enterprise.

πŸ˜‚πŸ‘Œ

Sure you do buddy.

The failure rate gives you an idea of how and when businesses tend to fail. 50 percent fail within the first five years.

https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/361350

2 points

Nom you literally confused "except" and "expect".

No I didn't. You are just so narcissistic, so dishonest, so pointless and so stupid. This is what you wrote:-

Any cop would happily except more training

https://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Abolish thepoliceyesor_no#arg1058889

You literally confused accept and except. All the sneering in the world won't stop you from being a fucking idiot.

2 points

A knife is a lethal weapon.

Also Amarel:-

A gun is nothing more than a tool for self-defence.

With people like you in it I don't even recognise this world any more.

2 points

Haha when you were trying to correct me, you misspelled the very word you were attempting to correct

Amarel, you literally confused "accept" and "except". You're ridiculously stupid.

1 point

No one in left leadership is willing to separate the phrase "black lives matter" from BLM intent lest they be called a white supremacist.

You are so hilarious. The way you try to set up a false narrative for BLM's "intent" right before you mock the idea that you are a white supremacist.

1 point

Your mild jab at Fox News also stands for nothing.

Whereas Fox News stands for racism, hate and the resurrection of fascism.

1 point

I don't take lectures from guys trying to hump retarded girls on the internet.

Get help you clown. You are psychiatrically unwell.

1 point

You said Trump filed 63 cases, then quoted a sentence that contradicts your comment.

Completely false. Your bizarre fallacy is that you are trying desperately to disconnect Trump from 63 cases which were all filed on the basis of his own lies. Trump was the one who told the lies and all of the cases were either developed by Trump personally or with his express authorisation.

You are just pathetic, Bronto. As per usual you are trying to have an argument about literally nothing. About the fact that Pence was the one who filed some of the litigation on Trump's behalf.

1 point

Give us some examples.

Leave the site you were banned from over a year ago.

1 point

I'm not American, nor a white nationalist

I don't believe either claim because your language is that of an American white nationalist.

Like I said, that's not the government's choice to make.

Then that's another thing you are wrong about. A government has every right to protect its citizens from idiots like you and your conspiracy theories that Covid is a hoax. The last time there was a pandemic of this scale, a third of the population of Europe died.

1 point

I see the problem here.

So do I. You've been banned several times for hording accounts and spamming the site with insane far right political propaganda, but you keep coming back Bronto. The problem is quite obviously that you are insane.

You are too stupid to discern that "Trump lost 63 cases" and "60 cases not filed by Trump" are antithetical statements.

There's nothing antithetical about it you pointlessly stupid, fallacious little imbecile. Trump was the leader of the party which filed the suits and he was the one who lied about fraud in the first place. Just because Pence filed some of the suits on behalf on Trump doesn't make Trump any less culpable. Christ, you're just so pathetic and desperate. Trump, and the Republicans who backed his fake claims about election fraud (Republicans like YOU!!!!), lost 63 cases in a row.

Deal with it. You're a goddamned embarrassment to humanity.

1 point

Trying to disarm women so you can rape them

I'm trying to disarm the rapists you want to sell guns to you lamentably stupid, programmed little halfwit.

3 points

It seems Trump was right about covid though.

About which part? The part where he claimed it was all under control, the part where he blamed the CDC, or the part where he suggested you can cure it by injecting disinfectant?

I just honestly find your delusional rubbish about Trump to be tiresome. I understand he is a hero to you white nationalist halfwits, but then again so is Hitler.

Frankly it has been insane to see the hysteria surrounding covid, and the extent to which people were willing to be tyrannised

No, the insane thing is your use of the word "tyrannised", to describe actions taken to reduce a world death count which is already over three million, even WITH the "tyranny". That's some lunatic reasoning right there. You yell about "tyranny" when the government is trying to save lives, but cheer and clap when it proposes building a giant wall across Mexico.

That's Americans for you. Programmed to be idiots.

Hootie(364) Clarified
2 points

Given the evidence presented in the trial. The amount of contact between the two, was nowhere near as prolonged as the media kept trying to tell us. It kind of makes the day all of those democrats knelt for 9 minutes, as a symbol, though weak as it was. Especially given what kind of colors they were wearing at the time.

Awww, are we salty that Chauvin was found guilty? That must have come as quite a blow to you white nationalists.

Hootie(364) Clarified
2 points

Mhm. Gateway drug.

Yeah, before you know it you'll be overdosing on fentanyl while somebody crushes your neck in an effort to save your life, right buddy? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

2 points

Hahaha ok. People sue each other over anything.

63 times? Hahahahaha! OK. πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Maybe a year of everyone justifying political violence

Or maybe a couple of Tweets from a despot?

You are laughably pathetic Amarel. A real weasel if ever I met one. πŸ˜‚

1 point

Your own link says almost all of these cases were filed by someone other than Donald Trump.

Oh, the Democrats filed them did they? Ahahahahahaha!!!! πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Here's what my own link says you fanatical fascist fool:-

Trump, his attorneys, and his supporters falsely[10] asserted widespread election fraud in public statements

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election lawsuitsrelatedtothe2020UnitedStatespresidentialelection

And you are continuing to make the exact same false statements 6 months later!!!!! Fuck off Bronto. Your wife and kids left you for one good reason: you're a natural born loser.

1 point

Ok, so far so good, that's almost an answer. What did he do? Elaborate.

I don't get paid to educate narcissists. Try Google.

While you're there look up "comma splice".

1 point

If you want video of Multiple Republicans calling for him to give up, just say the word.

Save it Bronto, you truly insane fanatic:-

More Than Half Of Republicans Believe Voter Fraud Claims

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/04/05/more-than-half-of-republicans-believe-voter-fraud-claims-and-most-still-support-trump-poll-finds/?sh=650e48f91b3f

There are multiple, blatant evidences of voter fraud.

πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost at least 63 lawsuits[1] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[2]

Nearly all the suits were dismissed or dropped due to lack of evidence;[3] judges, lawyers, and other observers described the suits as "frivolous"[4] and "without merit".[5][6] In one instance, the Trump campaign and other groups seeking his reelection collectively lost multiple cases in six states on a single day.[7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election lawsuitsrelatedtothe2020UnitedStatespresidentialelection

Trump lost 63 consecutive cases. Bronto claims "multiple, blatant evidences of voter fraud". It would almost be funny if you weren't actually insane. πŸ˜‚

1 point

Hi nomshit, Hitler was indeed voted into power, but you conveniently failed to continue with the full and concluding chapter of the chronical which was that he wasn't voted out of power.

And if the Republicans had gotten their way, neither would Trump. You are quick to forget that most of the party supported his absolutely baseless claims of election fraud, in a gambit for ultimate authority and power, which eventually -- thank goodness -- failed.

1 point

That's not what Trump did though.

That's exactly what he did.

He literally utilized the legal process within our standard institutions of law

πŸ˜‚πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ The 60 or so defeats he had in court evidence precisely that he DID NOT have any legal basis for overturning the election results. The legal system is there for people who have genuine legal arguments. It is not there to be abused by narcissistic fanatics who want to twist it into a tool of their own dictatorship.

Then some rabble who liked Trump went into the Capital building and broke stuff.

Why ever would they go to the Capitol building and break stuff? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Oh, that's right.... 😁 Your fuhrer ran out of options after being stonewalled by the criminal justice system, and so he tried to organise an armed insurrection instead.

But let me guess. You've got a different version of events, isn't that right you boring Nazi prick?

1 point

You are conflating two unrelated concepts.

No, I'm including relevant information which you left out when you used your alt account to attack Kamala Harris.

Fascism is what you practice.

You are literally an idiot Bronto.

1 point

Ah yes, the fascist that was voted into and out of power.

You have no reason to be using the definite article. Hitler himself was voted into power just like Donald Trump, and just like Donald Trump he tried to unravel the democratic apparatus once he was in power.

Shut your mouth and learn some history you ignorant American.

1 point

Kamala Harris locked up more than anybody. You voted for her.

The alternative was a fascist who literally tried to overthrow the democratic system and replace it with his own dictatorship. Since you left that part out I thought I'd better include it.

Hootie(364) Clarified
1 point

I don't know the context, but I'm assuming he means that the idea of fascism will survive its hosts?

It isn't a real quote you fool. I'm saying the exception doesn't disprove the rule. If one billionaire loses all his money that doesn't mean wealth isn't horded by the top echelon of society and it certainly doesn't mean his money is ever going to reach the poor. Even when well-known businesses fail they are usually bought out by other well-known businesses.

1 point

Look... Discussing capitalism with a communist

Any of course anybody who criticises capitalism must therefore be a communist!!! Good one πŸ˜‚πŸ‘Œ

Look, the fact is that you're an idiot. You can accuse me of name-calling all you like but your idiocy is a fact buddy.

1 point

by voluntary exchange with the poor

There is no "voluntary exchange" with the poor you narcissistic retard. The poor are exploited for labour. That's how capitalism works. If they weren't poor they wouldn't be selling their labour. They'd be spending their days in the sun just like the people exploiting them, not making stuff in factories.

By the exact same fallacious reasoning, slaveowners have a "voluntary exchange" with slaves. Otherwise the slaves would just refuse to work, right?

You are purposefully conflating coercion with volunteering. Nobody works because they want to work. They work because if they don't work they are likely going to starve. Your description of that as a "voluntary" arrangement is so offensive and backwards that one must wonder how you even manage to tie your shoelaces without assistance.

Hootie(364) Clarified
1 point

Both happens.

Laughable.

If both happened we wouldn't have any poor people left, would we?

1 point

Every time I spend my money, I vote for capitalism

The things you write are just so stupid, buddy. There is no connection between these two variables anywhere outside of your own imagination. If I spent money in the Soviet Union, would that be a vote for Communism? If I spent it in Hitler's Germany, would that be a vote for fascism?

You are literally an idiot, excon. You are a typical American. Lots to say but no computing power.


1 of 41 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]