CreateDebate


IdiotBronto's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of IdiotBronto's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Sorry, I forgot to ban this hateful pathetic clown.

Lol. You literally banned him for proving you wrong. Then you called HIM "hateful" and "pathetic". Ahahahaha! Hilarious.

1 point

In a Hezbollah owned facility.

You literally made that up. The stash was found across four different properties and nobody was even charged with an offence:-

Four properties were raided in North West London and a man in his forties was arrested on suspicion of plotting terrorism before being released without charge

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9257721/london-terrorists-bomb-factory-hezbollah/

Literally nothing happened. Some people bought some fertiliser. Great story bro.

1 point

But mainly? Your government tried to hide it until they got caught up on.

Cool. Tell us more about how Hezbollah owned the building and how the men were Iranian.

Radicals linked to Hizbollah, the Lebanese militant group, stashed thousands of disposable ice packs containing ammonium nitrate - a common ingredient in homemade bombs.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/09/iran-linked-terrorists-caught-stockpiling-explosives-north-west/

1 point

normal household items and isn't stockpiling more than three tons of ammonium nitrate.

You know that ammonium nitrate is fertiliser, right?

1 point

Your obvious problem being that a normal household isn't owned by Hezbollah

Your obvious problem is that what Hezbollah owns or doesn't own has absolutely ZERO relationship to whether something is a "bomb factory" or not. Hence, what you label "your obvious problem" is in fact yet another of your tiresome attempts to change the subject whenever you are caught LYING.

IdiotBronto(40) Clarified
1 point

yet you Leftist are GENDER CONFUSED

Not me buddy. I think those people are stupid. They represent an extremely small portion of the left outside America.

1 point

You forgot bomb making materials.

You forgot that bombs can be made from ordinary household items. Therefore, following on from your extraordinarily false language, every house is a bomb factory.

Except bomb factories are used to make bombs, not store material.

1 point

Covering up Islamic attacks and bomb factories

How many attacks were there and how many bombs were discovered, buddy?

Oh yes, that's right. Zero and zero. Your false language makes me want to literally spit in your face. Every word you utter is a lie. Everything.

1 point

There are many reasons why. One is to keep them at bay so as not to attack the British people.

There's only one reason why someone would open the same debate about the same topic five times over and that's because he keeps losing.

1 point

Ran off in fear once again.

You literally banned me from your debate because I used scientific research to debunk your claim that the US media is under the control of the left wing.

1 point

It's not logical to say Jihadists stop attacking if you cover up what they are doing

It isn't logical to say people are Iranian bombers when they aren't from Iran and haven't bombed anything, you cringeworthy retard. The difference being you actually said those words, whereas the sentence above is another one of your typical lies. You invent a false, ridiculous argument, and then claim it's what someone else believes. Typical corporatist right wing smear attacks from a typical piece of shit who stooges for them. Get a life mate. For God's sake.

IdiotBronto(40) Clarified
1 point

Brontoraptor doesn't have the idea that he's better than you.

So he lies about me constantly and calls me names because he loves me? Do you have evidence to support this theory, or are you just writing completely false things because you are under the false impression that I give a flying shit what you think about anything?

0 points

Are you talking to yourself and upvoting yourself??

Why are you interested? You aren't even slightly interested when you see Brontoraptor do it thirty times a day.

1 point

You are not a PAID CORPORATE SHILL ??

Do paid corporate shills usually have Marxist views? Do they want to abolish corporations and put the worker in charge of their own labour?

Wikipedia is your go toooooo !!!!!!!!!!

Not really. It's just the fastest source which is generally reliable. Some pages are policed heavily by special interest groups and corporate shills. The new breed of corporate-fascist super shill isn't just a problem for Democrats, but a problem for Republicans too. I watched a documentary last night called Dark Money, which is all about corporations successfully having state laws overturned which limit or forbid them to contribute directly to political campaigns. They go after Republicans and Democrats alike. Anybody in the Republican Party they consider a moderate they attack at the primaries.

0 points

LOL! Literally all you did is teach him the difference between a noun and a verb. What a moron he is. Honestly.

Yes, Brontoraptor has no rebuttal for verbs. He goes straight for the ban button.

1 point

Bronto, why did you ban me from your debate and then try to claim victory while I wasn't there?

LOL!

1 point

Nom unable to rebuttal British government covering up Hezbollah bomb factory

My rebuttal is that you are too stupid to even understand how English works. When it's a verb, you say, REBUT. Repeat after me, you deranged, pro-capitalist retard: REBUT.

1 point

Wikipedia makes your world right yet you continue to bitch !!

You know that Brontoraptor is almost certainly some kind of paid corporate shill, right?

1 point

Let's just consider what this sentence means:-

In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by 50 companies; as of 2011, 90% was controlled by just 6 companies and in 2017 the number was 5.[94]

It means the problem with corporate bias in the media first analysed and reported by Herman and Chomsky in the 1980s is TEN TIMES worse today than it was then.

1 point

Here is my other rebuttal he insisted I didn't have:-

86% of journalist donations going to the Democratic Party.

So something completely irrelevant to who controls the media then, yes?

Over time the amount of media merging has increased and the number of media outlets has increased. As a result, fewer companies now own more media outlets, increasing the concentration of ownership.[7] In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by 50 companies; as of 2011, 90% was controlled by just 6 companies and in 2017 the number was 5.[94]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration ofmediaownership#UnitedStates

1 point

Here is the rebuttal Brontoraptor insisted I didn't have:-

Is that why you banned me and then continued trying to argue with someone you were completely aware was unable to respond?

Ahahahaha! You delusional little moron.

What you did is make the false claim that the media is a "left wing complex", despite the completely obvious fact that it is owned by wealthy corporations and well known right wing nutcases like Rupert Murdoch and the Koch Brothers. When I disproved your outrageous populist myth-building by quoting the University of Michigan website, you spammed a random story about journalists donating to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Hence, you lied, you were proved to be lying, and instead of admitting it you changed the subject.

The research shows that you are wrong:-

Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky in their 1988 book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media[39] proposed a propaganda model to explain systematic biases of U.S. media as a consequence of the pressure to create a stable and profitable business. In this view, corporate interests create five filters that bias news in their favor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediabiasintheUnitedStates#Corporatebiasandpower_bias

Isn't it strange how that study from the 1980s is still featured prominently on the Wikipedia page about US media bias in 2019, huh buddy? I mean, surely we can just ignore it, right? I mean, it's from the 1980s!!!!

LOL! Keep shilling away, my little weasel.

1 point

86% of journalist donations going to the Democratic Party.

So something completely irrelevant to who controls the media then, yes?

Over time the amount of media merging has increased and the number of media outlets has increased. As a result, fewer companies now own more media outlets, increasing the concentration of ownership.[7] In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by 50 companies; as of 2011, 90% was controlled by just 6 companies and in 2017 the number was 5.[94]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration ofmediaownership#UnitedStates

1 point

Boy I whipped your ass like a football...

Is that why you banned me and then continued trying to argue with someone you were completely aware was unable to respond?

Ahahahaha! You delusional little moron.

What you did is make the false claim that the media is a "left wing complex", despite the completely obvious fact that it is owned by wealthy corporations and well known right wing nutcases like Rupert Murdoch and the Koch Brothers. When I disproved your outrageous populist myth-building by quoting the University of Michigan website, you spammed a random story about journalists donating to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Hence, you lied, you were proved to be lying, and instead of admitting it you changed the subject.

The research shows that you are wrong:-

Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky in their 1988 book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media[39] proposed a propaganda model to explain systematic biases of U.S. media as a consequence of the pressure to create a stable and profitable business. In this view, corporate interests create five filters that bias news in their favor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediabiasintheUnitedStates#Corporatebiasandpower_bias

Isn't it strange how that study from the 1980s is still featured prominently on the Wikipedia page about US media bias in 2019, huh buddy? I mean, surely we can just ignore it, right? I mean, it's from the 1980s!!!!

LOL! Keep shilling away, my little weasel.

3 points

LOL! I see you've changed your story after you were busted LYING about "Iranian bombers" last night. "Iranian bombers" who weren't Iranian and who didn't bomb anything.

Now spam us some more extreme Christian right hate blogs owned by corrupt billionaires, you laughable clown.

1 point

your refusal to defend your country

are being used to destroy the West by Communists and Jihadists.

If you are going to quote Hitler speeches then at least credit the man in a footnote.

IdiotBronto(40) Clarified
1 point

Jesus was only referring to humans though.

Hold on a minute. That doesn't add up. God supposedly created all creatures, not just humans. If he only thinks humans are deserving of love that means he deliberately created animals to suffer. I think you invented your premise out of thin air.

1 point

If this were my position, I wouldn't reproduce another diseased person into a disease ridden environment. What, you would? Dude!

Yeah, luckily we have people around like Bronto and Hitler, who simply opt to gas them.

-1 points

I'd love to hear this. Go ahead. Explain it to me.

It's easy. You are what we call a retard, and as a retard, you campaign for guns to be legal. Since that causes countless guns to be sold to sadists, rapists, psychopaths and wannabe assassins, it forces everybody who isn't one of those things to buy a gun in order to protect themselves from the people who are.

Would you like a small diagram to go along with that, you stupid little runt?

-1 points

Why does Pelosi need guns but I don't?

Pelosi needs guns because psychopaths like you can buy them in candy stores, fuckwit.

0 points

Democrats never respond when we say Rich Liberals have body guards with guns. Why?

Cause you fucking BANNED us

It's even worse than that, because he banned us FOR fucking responding.

1 point

The left wing Globalists in Brussels went too far and too quickly in trying dim the national pride and heritage of the member states.

The right wing Nazis in Berlin went too far when they annexed Czechoslovakia.

The loony lefties then swamped the E.U.

Nice. But the rabid righties then plundered through Europe killing everything in their path.

On top of this the Muslim immigrants

Need to be gassed? Oh dear. Not again.

1 point

What idiot Brontoraptor is deliberately not telling you is that the far left also cleaned house at the European elections. The ground was lost in the centre as voters flocked to one of either two poles.

Take a short moment to contemplate how that reality differs from Brontoraptor's distortion where you get precisely one half of the story.

See:-

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/28/18642498/european-parliament-elections-2019-takeaways-greens-salvini-brexit-eu

0 points

The people in those nations are seeing how great a job Trump is doing, and are trying to do the same in their nations.

That's quite a batshit insane interpretation of the resurgence of fascism in Europe. Forgotten what happened the last time, have we? Jolly good. Jog on, idiot.

IdiotBronto(40) Clarified
1 point

Populist Parties Swept French, Britain, Hungarian, Polish and Italian Elections

But tell us about Spain, buddy.

1 point

Marxism and Progressivism are a religion.

Literally every word which comes out of your mouth is an attack against the left. You are a laughable fundamentalist prick who spent all night last night (AGAIN) spamming the site with extreme far right Christian hate blogs. Whatever the truth of any situation happens to be, it is a guaranteed fact that you will be on this website screaming the exact polar opposite.

No one would believe the shit naturally without indoctrination.

Oh for God's sake shut your stupid mouth you horrible toxic idiot. Marxism is an academic theory taught in universities and you are encouraging people to take a literal interpretation of the Bible. Your ceaseless insistence that black is white and white is black is boring, stupid, and makes me personally want to punch a hole in your childish face.

1 point

Jesus loves you, honey

Satan loves you. Fat retards are his favourite.

1 point

Iranian bombers

NOT IRANIAN.

NOT BOMBERS.

OP IS LYING NAZI SCUMBAG.

1 point

Then try doing it some time.

Bronto, you have to be relatively intelligent to be cognizant of when you are being crushed. That rules you out by default.

1 point

Meaning?

Are you seriously asking ME what YOU meant? Ahahaha! Utterly priceless.

No one in real life directed me toward one belief

The people who wrote the Bible obviously directed you, retard.

You on the other hand, vomit out the leftist talking points

Attempted change of subject noted. Fresh lie also noted.

Someone had to tell you what to believe

Ahahahaha! No Bronto, that's the beauty of THINKING FOR YOURSELF, instead of being stupid enough to be brainwashed by a scientifically laughable 3,000 year old public relations masterpiece.

1 point

Because you're obviously high on some dirty drugs

Close, but not quite. I enjoy crushing you intellectually because it gives me immense satisfaction, and the reason for that is because you are a truly hideous liar. Not even your own wife or children could stand to be around you because you tell so many lies. It's fucking disgusting if I'm perfectly honest.

1 point

Sure it does.

Are you aware that you are pitifully stupid and insane?

You claimed I hadn't read the Bible

No, YOU claimed you had not read the Bible, idiot, which is why you wrote:-

"I came about my beliefs with no help from anyone other than my own mind"

Obviously if you read the Bible "inside out" then those ideas you now believe in, WHICH ARE WRITTEN DOWN IN THE FUCKING BIBLE, did not come out of your own stupid fucking head!!

1 point

Which contradicts your own claim.

LMFAO! No retard, it contradicts YOUR claim. I made no claim. You made the claim, and it was: "I came about my beliefs with no help from anyone other than my own mind, which you CLEARLY DIDN'T DO IF YOU READ THE BIBLE!!

Nom: So without reading the Bible or hearing anything about him from anybody else

That was a question, not a claim, which is why you seem to have "forgotten" to include the full quote or the question mark at the end. God, you are literally fucking pathetically stupid. Why do I even waste my time with you?

1 point

So do you care to address why you lied and claimed these men were "Iranian bombers"? When,

A) They are not Iranian. And...

B) They didn't bomb anything?

Or let me guess. No. You don't want to address that lie. Right buddy?

Get back to your Christian hate groups you fucking retarded neo-fascist idiot.

1 point

Except that it isn't.

It clearly is. Those men weren't Iranian and they didn't bomb anything. Hence, your description of them as "Iranian bombers" is a total stinking lie.

Die, lying Nazi scum.

1 point

Oh, and don't use mediabiasfactcheck. They're a far left Nazi propaganda machine.

Bronto, you literally claimed Benito Mussolini was a far left propaganda machine. You are literally fucking mad, which explains why you get your information from far right Christian hate groups, why you keep pretending the Nazis were on the left, and why you were just caught LYING that these men were Iranians. Literally everything that you ever type is lie. That's a demonstrable fact buddy, and when you get exposed for it, you ban me and then reply with yet more lies that I can't respond to. You are the literal definition of a fucking Nazi. See:-

The National Socialist German Workers' Party, commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party was a far-right political party in Germany that was active between 1920 and 1945.

The Nazi Party emerged from the German nationalist, racist and populist Freikorps paramilitary culture, which fought against the communist uprisings in post-World War I Germany.[6] The party was created to draw workers away from communism and into völkisch nationalism.[7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]