CreateDebate


K1ll3r's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of K1ll3r's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Are you retarded?

Did you watch it all?

Laurie counters the arguments. She doesn't "slience" her. The feminist is sterring from them....

Dude, you contradicted yourself.....

1 point

What the hell?

What kind of arumnet is that? Another sand-based argument.

Get out.

2 points

HAHA.

Look outside the country?!? That only confirms FNC's arguments! Look at Europe! Their own leaders are begging for less bias. Your argument is based on sand.

1 point

It is really neither.

Rush, and Shawn are radical conservatives. They have a lot of facts, but hand-pick them. But I still like them.

While Glenn Beck is probaly the only guy there on FNC who shows just the facts. I see no facts that are not verifiable. His argument Health Care was great, along with many others.

FNC is mixed up.

I look to local news for verifiable facts.

1 point

All it takes is a little bit of research to see this is a total fallacy.

http://allafrica.com/stories/200806100748.html

http://www.uncommondescent.com/science/400-scientists-disputed-man-made-global-warming-us-senate-report/

Also, the hottest year on record is 1934. (Proof: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/347541/nasa_admits_that_1934_not_1998_was.html Confirmation: http://articles.latimes.com/2007/aug/15/ science/sci-temp15) )

It's all propaganda. Government trying to get control. There is nothing wrong with the enviroment. Sure, there's litter, but you don't see animals dropping dead everywhere, do you?

1 point

"Many scientists believe that the Earth has reached its maximum limit in supporting life.....by 2436...I believe not... unless we can predict that our technology will be advanced enough to solve this problem at that time."-We probaly would have found other planets that can sustain life and move to them to that planet. We HOEPFULLY move animal and plant life to that planet. Just think 3-Dimentionally.

1 point

"Of course I do...the falsehoods that you stated here again & again are right here in black & white for all to see."- Then why hasn't anyone else responded to it? Hmm?

"BTW, don't like being laughed at eh?? Well, know that when others read your utter nonsense here that they'll be doing the same thing...lol..."- It's been for three days. Someone would say smething.

"BTW, don't like being laughed at eh??"-People don't laugh in debates, last time I heard, I thought this was a debate site, not YouTube.

1 point

""LOL...the concept is, moron, guilty until proven innocent. It's one of the basis of the founding our our nation BTW."- facepalm American CITIZENS, CITIZENS! Not insurgents.

"You've successfully proven my point very nicely...that torture is NOT an effective way of interrogating people, period end of story."- So? Do you think we honestly use it for info? Hehehehe. If you noticed, I googled that, hee. I wouldn't use something that I found on google as an argument. Don't believe me? Google "torture is effective"

"Wrong again wing-nut. As I've pointed out to you numerous times now, torture is illegal under both U.S. AND International Law, and there are NO exceptions to this prohibition."- You must be stupid, which is something I can't fix. SELF DEFENSE! Google it if you have to. Man.

"Once again, you back up my point that there are ZERO, legal exceptions to when someone can be tortured, period.'- I said it earlier, self defense. You said nothing against it.

"Another Right-wing opinion piece being passed off as "fact"...ugh...learn to know the difference between stating FACTS & merely unsupported opinions, moron."- I've never laughed so hard in real life. All right wing opinions are wrong? So much for un-biased! And these "facts" you get, I've noticed, from the same sources, left-wing papers and news. When you get BOTH sides of the stories, I'll listen and take this seriously.

"Alan Dershowitz is a well-known appologist for the Right-wing. His opinions mean nothing to me."- Right Wing is always wrong? The all powerful left wing is always correct? Pfff. You've only gone to CNN and BBC sources, both KNOWN for left-wing biased opinions. Fox News is also biased, conservatively.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1942948.ece

http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/ biasbasics2admissions.asp

Timesonline is somewhat biased.

But media research is FACT. I do wish they did something on Fox News, though.

But I digress.

Bring terrorists into the US isn't right. For the safety of us,and them. I think Copenhagen proved when people have probelms, they get angry.

Also, it may not be effective(you got me there, pretty good) but the US and everyone will use it. As you know laws, not matter how serious, are always going to be abused. No matter how "immoral" it may be, it will always be abused.

And torture is EFFECTIVE in small cases, like if you're protecting your family. But internationally it is not. I never said it was justified national, actually, I never specified.

Your smarter than I thought. :)"

Finish the arguments you steered away from.

1 point

Moron, hehehe.

Coming from the one who loves to steer from the subject.

I'll just say what said again, and maybe you'll respond to it.

""Facts are facts...learn the difference between biased opinion & real, verifiable facts."- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! What facts? New York Times, Washington Post? HAHA!!!! Oh God, that brought a tear to my eye. Tampa Bay Tribune is not biased. Use that for once.

"...because you obviously are."- completely independent, dumbass.

"All humans have rights because they are human, period."-

Ok, I'll hang a few bodies in your front yard and see how "human" you think I am. By the way, if you take this as a threat... oh God, you're retarded.

"Of course you can...with FACTS. Opinions that are not based on verifiable facts are worthless...just like yours are, moron."

lolwut.jpg is needed here. What verifiable facts? You've only spammed CD with liberal media. With nothing to verify it... I've backed up my info, you can simply google my info, and find that it is backed up well.

So much for not responding."

1 point

"Blah, blah, blah...what's your next "argument" going to be Nazi-boy?? "And so's your mother!" Please, you've run out of mildly coherent things to say in this thread...therefore, I'm DONE responding to you here...so ramble on moron..." I never said that. You are really stupid. Your lack of any knowledge is disgusting. Stay in school to get smart.

"Nazi-boy"- Not all Germans are nazis. Stereotypical bastard, my grandfather was sent to Concentration Camps.

"Please, you've run out of mildly coherent things to say in this thread"- What gives you the idea this is a thread? This isn't a *chan.

1 point

"but that doesn't mean that all media is lying, moron."- Funny, you said it was....

1 point

"Same to you...you certainly have a knack for saying nothing again & again & again..."- You have no proof of that. I do, because all I've heard is "lol", which I don't believe is used in debating....

1 point

"It's had to have been a LOT longer than that, because apparently you didn't learn a thing in school kiddo." - not really. Obviously you didn't. "lol" and "moron" and a bunch of crap is all I've heard, anyway, i have to shower.

1 point

"What a moron you really are...you just don't like being schooled with the FACTS of the matter, so you feebly try to claim "bias" in the actual factual reporting, where there is none...lol...what a joke..."- Total steer away from the argument. All media is opionated whether you like it or not. The leave things out and put things in. Simple as that.

"Then you disgrace Germany with your support of illegal torture, period. Run along now..." Another steer away, debate, don't hate.

1 point

"So, it MY job to do YOUR homework here?? I don't think so, moron"- Best argument I've ever heard, because I haven't done any homework in 10 years. Great job on grammar... You have to be 10

1 point

"LOL...thanks for admitting that you have nothing of actual value to contribute to this discussion, but what else is new eh??"- Wow...... I'm just gonna act like I didn't see that. Great debating skills.

-2 points
1 point

"You insuate that I am right-wing. I'm completley neutral, so I'm not bashed by my one for my opinion. Both wings are insane. Inhuman acts do not deserve human rights. That's why I believe in the Capital Penalty for rape and murder, but I digress. They should be treated as POW's not regular prisoners, that's all.

Terrorists are sick demented people, that's why they don't deserve human rights. But that's all opinion. You can't debate opinion, so that argument's shit." - You had no response for this, so you have changed subject AGAIN. ha.

1 point

"Facts are facts...learn the difference between biased opinion & real, verifiable facts."- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! What facts? New York Times, Washington Post? HAHA!!!! Oh God, that brought a tear to my eye. Tampa Bay Tribune is not biased. Use that for once.

"...because you obviously are."- completely independent, dumbass.

"All humans have rights because they are human, period."-

Ok, I'll hang a few bodies in your front yard and see how "human" you think I am. By the way, if you take this as a threat... oh God, you're retarded.

"Of course you can...with FACTS. Opinions that are not based on verifiable facts are worthless...just like yours are, moron."

lolwut.jpg is needed here. What verifiable facts? You've only spammed CD with liberal media. With nothing to verify it... I've backed up my info, you can simply google my info, and find that it is backed up well.

So much for not responding.

1 point

"...i your wildest dreams that is, moron...lol..." Terrible, terrible grammar.....

1 point

"...with actual, verifiable FACTS in them, wing-nut. Try & refute them...hint: You can't! LMAO!"- Then verify them. Use another source SAYING THE SAME THING. You sound so stupid, by the way.

"LOL...what a moron you really are..."personal responsibility"...those words are just that, meaningless words to GOPers like you...lol..."- You assume I am GOP.... and other than that... just pure stupidity.

"LOL...once again, I've already posted my evidence of this...lol...try reading it, moron."- Umm.. no.

"and YOU disgrace America with your blatant support for ILLEGAL torture"- I don't live in America. Germany. Boohoo.

1 point

"for which you have exactly ZERO information, period."- Google it.

"LOL...yea, right, and facts aren't facts...sure, sure...moron."

That was.... just so.... stupid.

1 point

Ok, you win this battle.

You're learning the game, kiddo.

But I still will agrue because it's fun.

"Not terrorist prisoners. It's NEVER happened, period."- True, I don't mean to sound paranoid, but it could, just saying.

"LOL...it time to get schooled again, moron:

"Supermax Prisons in U.S. Already Hold Terrorists"

"Detained in the supermax facility in Colorado are Ramzi Yousef, who headed the group that carried out the first bombing of the World Trade Center in February 1993; Zacarias Moussaoui, convicted of conspiring in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001; Ahmed Ressam, of the Dec. 31, 1999, Los Angeles airport millennium attack plots; Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, conspirator in several plots, including one to assassinate President George W. Bush; and Wadih el-Hage, convicted of the 1998 bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kenya."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/21/AR2009052102009.html

Also held at ADX Florence:

-Abdul Hakim Murad, of al-Qaeda's Operation Bojinka

-Mahmud Abouhalima, of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing

-Ahmed Ajaj, of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing

-Nidal Ayyad, of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing

-Iyman Faris, also of the NYC landmark plot, sentenced to 20 years in 2003

-Matthew F. Hale, 15177-424, white supremacist for soliciting the murder of federal judge Joan Lefkow

-Clement Rodney Hampton-El, a.k.a. Dr. Rashid, convicted in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing

-Eyad Ismail, 37802-054, of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing

-Mohammed Mansour Jabarah, a Canadian convicted of terrorism-related offences

-Theodore Kaczynski, 04475-046, the "Unabomber"

-John Walker Lindh, dubbed "The American Taliban"

-Tom Manning, political serial bomber, has been transferred to USP Hazelton

-Khalfan Khamis Mohamed, participant in the 1998 United States embassy bombings

-Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-Owhali, of the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings

-Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad, would-be financier of al-Qaeda and Hamas, serving 75 years

-Dandeny Muñoz Mosquera, chief assassin for Pablo Escobar, responsible for the bombing of Avianca Flight 203

-Terry Nichols, 08157-031, Oklahoma City bombing conspirator

-El Sayyid Nosair, of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

-Mohammed Odeh is one of the four former al-Qaeda members sentenced to life imprisonment in 2001 for their parts in the 1998 United States embassy bombings.

-Richard Reid, 24079-038, al-Qaeda's would-be "Shoe Bomber"

-Oscar Rivera, leader of the Armed Forces of National Liberation, a Puerto Rican militant group, for bombing 28 targets in the Chicago area. Received an additional 15-year sentence for an escape attempt (from another prison).

-Eric Robert Rudolph, 18282-058, terrorist, committed the Centennial Olympic Park bombing and other bombings

-Mohammed A. Salameh, of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing

-James Ujaama, who tried to develop an al-Qaeda camp in Oregon

-Wali Khan Amin Shah, convicted on charges stemming from Operation Bojinka

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/04/AR2006050401902_pf.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1535863/Held-in-darkness-for-the-rest-of-his-natural-life.html

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1555145-1,00.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/11/60minutes/main3357727.shtml

http://www.ktvu.com/news/11751657/detail.html

http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=IDSearch&IDType;=IRN&IDNumber;=37802-054

"SuperMax Illinois Prison to Soon Hold Gitmo Detainees"

http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/12/15/supermax-illinois-prison-to-soon-hold-gitmo-detainees/ "

-Very well structured argument, but cut "lol" and the flaming, it makes you sound like an idiot. Use many sources. Like you have here. But you go left-wing. Tisk, use some right wing and you'll get somewhere.

"They deserve HUMAN rights...just like all humans get...simply because they are human. Why are you Right-wing morons afraid of actual terrorists being actually, legally held responsible for their terrorist acts??"- You insuate that I am right-wing. I'm completley neutral, so I'm not bashed by my one for my opinion. Both wings are insane. Inhuman acts do not deserve human rights. That's why I believe in the Capital Penalty for rape and murder, but I digress. They should be treated as POW's not regular prisoners, that's all.

Terrorists are sick demented people, that's why they don't deserve human rights. But that's all opinion. You can't debate opinion, so that argument's shit.

1 point

No.....

Stupid athesist anarchist.

Religon is a large probelm. Mainly with MUSLIMS. Not Christians. What has Christianity done to you? Sorry mom won't buy you the rape simulation game because it's graphic and you're 12. Sorry Mr. Rebel. Christians haven't shot anybody. Neither have anothers besides Muslims. I don't mean to be religiously biast, even though i'm Thouist. Anyway, Christianity has done nothing to anyone, and no one has any proof of such, at least in modern times. I don't care about 1254. Thats over and you can cry and cut yourself about it.

As a parent, I see nothing in people who have the "fuck the world" attitude.


1 of 3 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons
©2014 TidyLife, Inc. All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Debate Forum | Big shout-outs to The Bloggess and Andy Cohen.