Well If you have better things to do, and dont care about the bible prophecy than you dont need to post anything on here. The Question is what if...And you responded with: "I'm Atheist, So I dont care and it wont happen because I am atheist" So please, leave this discussion to the people who DO care. Hope I didn't come off like a jerk though. No hard feelings? haha
Holy piss man.... Let me break it down to you so you can understand.
Stanly Meyers supposed car split water into hydrogen and oxygen, and then performed electrolysis
Electrolysis is what splits the Hydrogen and oxygen. Why would he perform electrolysis after the Hydrogen and Oxygen were split.
Due to covalent bonding between an Oxygen atom and two hydrogen Atoms in H20, The oxygen atom is unstable and results in a negative charge. The hydrogen atoms are then positive. If you set up two electronic fields, one positve and one negative, you can pull the molecule apart creating oxygen and hydrogen molecules and burn the hydrogen. Unfortunatly this alone is not very economic but Stan Meyers found a solution.
He created a circuit board called the voltage intensifier which lowers the amps and increases the voltage. All this stuff I mentioned is not quite the same as his injector. His injector is a total different thing. But it seemed you didn't fully understand this and thats why I ask you to do your homework. So please visit this webstite : www.waterfuelcell.org watch the two lecture videos...you might actually learn something. Be sure to watch the video on the right first because it is part 1 of the lecture. Part 2 talks mostly about the voltage intensifier.
Ha you are so stupid it's not that funny..... Im Not talking about the hydrogen fuel cell. Im talking about an injector created my STANLEY MEYERS. THIS IS NOT THE SAME AS THE FUEL CELL. This is run purely by water, and does all the things I have said, Not pure Hydrogen like in your video. The injector is not used anywhere either. After Stanley Meyers died, nobody has been able to create the injector based off his schematics. And I dont think I'm going to mess with nuclear fission/fussion. Haha, that would be bad. But now you know ;)
It's a lot more complicated actually. Its like the fuel cell but the plates switch polarities very quickly back and forth, causing the molecules to get excited and turning it into a steam before seperating it into H and O. Then, there is an electron collector that pulls the electrons of the H and O making it unstable so it decays and the energy from the nuclear fisson (or fusion) actually powers the engine or something. It's crazy
I mean water powered engine as in splitting water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis then burning the hydrogen to drive the pistons. I believe that is cold fusion that you referred to though. It is possible. What I was meant by the question, is not whether it is possible or not, but whether anyone would be able to mass produce it with these over powering oil companies.
I'm not saying the water is inexpensive. I see what you mean, but to an extent it can cost much much less.
first, If you were to make the engine yourself It would be pretty cheap, but you would have to have the knowledge. Which, if you did enough research on the internet and some dedicated time would be do-able.
Second, Stan Meyers invented an injector that goes inplace of the spark plug, and with a little clean up of the engine, and this injector, you can easily convert a normal combustible engine into a water powered engine. this would probably cost around $300 or so. Unfortunatly nobody knows how to make it and Stan Meyers is dead. The pattens with scematics are available on the internet, and the patten has timed out. So it only takes someone capable of understanding his scematics and making it, and there are plenty of well qualified scientists in this world.
I love posting my school essay topics on here ;)
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
It may be true that it has more evidence, but that does not mean it should be the only thing taught in schools. Contradictory theories should also be taught. any other two contradictory theories would be. Why not creationism and big bang, or evolutiomn and intelligent design? It is still a theory.
Creationism is also a theory of how everything came to be, scientific or not. Creationism is just as logical of an explanation as Evolution or the Big Bang theory too. you can argue: Where there is design, there must be a designer. For instance, suppose you came upon a deserted island and found ‘S.O.S.’ written in the sand on the beach. You would not think the wind or the waves had written it by mere chance but that someone had been there, someone intelligent enough to design and write the message. Same as with the Big Bang or Evolution. Something so complex and so complicated that humans, after thousands of years, still do not fully comprehend could have happened by mere chance!?!?
Im going to argue for motocross because nobody has. obviously none of you have tried motocross. It is a lot more physically challenging than just sitting on the bike for 30 minutes. Your on your feet most of the time, and you have to constantly manipulate the bike with your body, which can weigh up to 250 pounds, depending on the bike. Its hard to be able to yank that thing around nonstop for the entire race. around every corner, off every jump, you are never just sitting there and twisting the throttle. You never get a break while offense is out, or while you sit out on the bench.
From my understanding Sexting is not what you described. Its more of a sexual harrasment, when one person bugs another person sexually while texting. Why would the government do such thing anyway, they dont give a damn what teens do. How do you tell the difference between sexual harrasment and...uh..consentual sexting anyway? That would be just stupid. But like JC said, I would sure apply for the postion to go through the pictures and stuff... HEHE
Dragonforce, in my opinion, sucks balls. The guitar is literally just random smashing of the strings...especially live. Wanna hear a real guitarist listen to Stevie Ray Vaughn. I love the guitar, mostly electric. As soon as you plug it in it is a total different instrument than an acoustic. The Amp is a third of the instrument. Then the guitar is the other and the guitarist is the final piece. I love playing blues especially because it just has so much soul. It hard to find another instrument to be that emotionally attached to.
Well I would rather be ugly and smart because that can go a long ways, but looks is very important. imagine if the whole world was just ugly people. It would tear the sexuality from every fun thing. I think we would most likely have less people because nobody would want to make babies ;)
Why would somethings so horrific ever be right? Could it possibly be just? maybe you could protest in your own country in hopes of getting the United Nations to step in perhaps. Otherwise, you will just wind up dead for no gain whatsoever.
Still not quite right. This is the order it kind of goes in.
A=B
B=C
therefore, A=C
See how B transfers over to your next propositon? it begins it. chickens would be A. Running around with their heads cut off is B Zombies is C. There are different ways to go about it as well. This is the form i understand the most.
What if you become a police sniper? eh? then you will need to calculate how many inches above the target you need to shoot due to distance. Also if the targets moving you would need to calculate how long it will take the bullet to reach the target and where they will be in that time, so you can aim so far infront. EH? do your math man, or you will be SCREWED.
Not necessarily, not one sole thing in Mexico makes EVERYBODY happy. There will always be some downer who can find away around it. Lets say right now, I hate EVERYTHING about Mexico. not a single thing makes me happy about Mexico. Now what? it is unsound is what.
Well, for every thing that makes one person happy, you could come up with something about that thing that makes another person un-happy, canceling it out in a way. One person may like they food, one person may hate it. One person might like the oxygen, one person might think its dry and smells bad. So what it all boils down to is that it really is all that simple. Mexico DOES make people sick.
Although I would complete support using water for fuel, because its clean, I have one problem. This would effect our economy deeply. For one, where I live (Wyoming) our main form of money is from coal and oil. If we get rid of oil, our state, and country would go into a downfall. On the other side, The country wouldnt have to rely on Saudi Arabia suppling us oil, and we would be reducing the rate of national debt. And maybe get rid of most of Saudi Arabias power, which I think could become a threat to the country. Oil Companies have way to much power and will do anything for money.
Like with Stan meyers for example. A man with a plan. He created a vehicle to run on water, and then invented an injector that does things I dont understand to easily convert a combustion engine into one that runs on water. EASY, but unfortuantly he died. He was poisoned right after refusing to sell his patten to an oil company.
While Electric vehicles may be more clean than oil, its still not very clean. Not even close to as clean as using Water to make hydrogen and have oxygen and water vapors as a bi-product. Where does electricity come from? The majority comes from burning coal. Clean? I dont think so
