CreateDebate


LordofFacts's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of LordofFacts's arguments, looking across every debate.
0 points

As a Socialist I need all the money I can get, because we live in a system where only those who have a shitload of money have any power to change the system. This idea you have that the more wealthy a left winger is the more of a hypocrite they are is just dumb. I want billions and billions of dollars so that I have the power to change the system.

I don't believe in anything supernatural, because everything that exists is a part of nature and "supernatural" essentially means "those parts of nature which are not understood". I do not believe in spirits, but I am open to the possibility that there are some form of inter-dimensional beings or something which could be mistaken for spirits.

2 points

Nay .

2 points

Aye .

0 points

Fascists, stupid people, liars, rich people, and religious people. At least that's what it is for me, other leftists may be different.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
2 points

Dude tell me the truth, did you get the name Fiora from league of legends?

Would you rather be a calmmunist or a pissedian?

.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

She's not monogamous with me, never was or will be. She made that clear from day one (not in a nasty way).

Yeah, obviously. The universe is a garden of dicks for her, and she chooses them as she pleases (so long as her real mack daddy pimp allows it).

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

It's a 5 day ban, I checked.

I guess Fiora is on my side after all. I guess she did lend me her pussy this time.

Democratic and Socialism are oxymorons.

They are very much not oxymorons, collective ownership of the means of production entails democratic (collective) decision making.

We keep giving you the definition from the dictionary.

It depends which dictionary you ask really, but I prefer to go by the definition provided by the actual socialists who came up with various forms of socialism. A capitalist defining socialism is like a Nazi defining Jews. The definition will probably be partially true, but then they will sprinkle on some propaganda.

What are you trying to do here, prove yourself wrong? .

0 points

The core teaching of Bronto is to abuse your children and wife and pets and get your legs blown off for the cause of economic imperialism.

2 points

Getting rich off of capitalism after condemning it, is like a militant anti drugs advocate lighting up just because it exists you blabbering jerk off.

Under capitalism you need money just to live unless you're going to live off the land, nevermind actually changing things or having any influence in society or having a comfortable and pleasurable life.

0 points

You are Nom. You have no dick.

You're a retarded twit

my intellect is marvelous

plus I've got the largest dick

on earth, and it's hard as shit

you can disregard and diss

me, but I'll just discard it quick

cause' you're nardless git

and when I fart you ain't as smart as it

Are you stupid enough to think someone is not going to try to make money in a system that revolves around money even if they don't agree with the system? Have you ever cooperated with someone or considered them your equal? Yeah? Well I guess that kills your "socialism is bad" narrative.

2 points

I'll bloody bugger you in the centre of your arse hole mate.

It's easy to tell that I am not Nom, we are just buddies with similar views. Also we both have a bigger dick than you and your IQ is equivalent to that of a stray poodle.

Democrats/Libs can't tell you. Just like they can't tell you the difference between Socialism and Democratic Socialism.

That's because number one Americans don't know what socialism is and number 2 socialism is inherently democratic if you're doing it right. Also liberals aren't socialist, they're more left leaning capitalists.

2 points

The right wants rich people to rule everything and the alt-right wants a dictatorship to rule everything.

Coolness is subjective. Unless it is the genuine coldness that fake Jews like you show towards Palestinian children suffering under Israeli tyranny.

2 points

lol, check your PMs in a little while, I'll tell you the plan I had.

2 points

As you age, your genes mutate, so even if he was an ethnic Jew he would be less of one now then he was when he was born.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

You will find that what I am saying is, the game of tennis evolved due to the spectators, not the players.

Random analogies that suit your purposes do nothing to prove your point, I could do the same. The "game" we are talking about is the result of humans interacting with each other and with nature.

The players that couldn't evolve with that evolution, well exactly... They don't matter; they're the losers.

Exactly, which is why if you're a capitalist you're a loser. Since it's the players that make up the game, if the game doesn't evolve it's because the players didn't evolve and you may have your fun on this level of the game but all of humanity will go extinct if we stay at this level much longer.

That's how it always works but sometimes a scumbag gets by working less hard and EVEN less smart with some 'cheats'. You need to work with the human psychology of the moderators, law or even yourself to stay disciplined and resolute in the face of their rule-breaking and end up usurping them or hating the game too much as it enables such cheating (not hating them for doing it).

Or you could just put the cheaters in a gulag and change the rules of the game so it doesn't allow cheating. But since the rule-makers are the biggest cheaters in the game that's not going to happen. The game is fucked up because the top players are ALL cheaters and the average player is stupid as fuck.

Don't hate the player, hate the game.

Never liked that saying. The players are the ones that make the game what it is in the first place.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

I already told you the difference between debating to win in a 1v1 arena and debating to explore ideas in a casual arena.

I already explained the difference between sexual harassment and sexting.

0 points

Many of those one percenters vote Democrat. Why do you suppose that is?

Because democrats are capitalists.

If you actually believe the Left is not in bed with the Rich, while making you believe they are on the little guy's side... I have a bridge to sell you!

Democrats are not the left. They are welfare-capitalists, which makes them barely on the left. There is a lot more to both the left and right than you are aware of because America only allows a narrow part of the spectrum into mainstream politics.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

Why are you treating me like this?

Because you think lying is "superior strategy".

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

Aside from the Queen-angle, can I explore the other parts with you and how you are running the logic?

What do you call a ripped condom on the end of a dick?

the cum spangled banner.

But enough about the things you said you would do to me in PM last night. I would be happy to run my logic all over that ass. Where shall we begin?

when the media is 99% Liberal biased. The 1% Fox News could never overcome the entirety of the rest of the media.

Fox News is not one percent of the media, they are just the part of it that shills for the one percent the hardest. I can see why you would mix them up though.

Why can't it be 2 of the 3 or all 3 at once?

It can, it can even be none of them, but it usually is at least one of them.

Actually, I don't like either... .

Then ban all of Bronto's 500 alt accounts. You have already banned 500 of mine.

2 points

Have you ever considered that rich people are not rich because they are superior, but because they either have mass appeal, are good at cheating and lying or because of inheritance? Because in reality it's usually one of the three.

UK, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium and modern-day (not Communist) Cambodia are all examples of nations that are legally genuine Monarchies (army etc serve the monarch not the elected official) and yet are Democratic in practise.

They are not Monarchies, the monarchs are still respected and still have hereditary wealth but that doesn't make them monarchies.

I don't think you know what benevolence is.

I don't think you know what I know or what I think.

2 points

I do not want Stratocracy, no.

Then why do you openly support "benevolent" oligarchy you idocratic lying fuckstick.

2 points

I watched your video.. Dude. You really suck, and you're ugly too.

Actually I'm great and extremely handsome but it's cool cause' I know you're just a jealous European Atheist that looks like a bag of coffee grounds.

Gaining points on this website and bypassing the very debate-bans AND site-bans you abuse the non-alt-abusers not being able to do are 3 examples of you cheating the system here, snitching on your primary rival both in private and in public regularly and you defying your own principles.

Why do you point your nose to the sky and judge others like this when your primary debate tactics are deception and misrepresentation?

4 points

It is actually the worst political system there is

I can think of a few worse ones, like monarchy and fascism and almost every other system there is for that matter.

It always

What do you mean "it always" ? It has never even existed except in theory.

it denies human nature and political strategy

"Human nature" is largely determined by the environment the human exists in. Political strategy is largely determined by corrupt the system is, so I guess the answer is to let it stay corrupt huh?

doomed to end up as a Tyrannical Oligarchy that instead of being Plutocratic is instead 'Statocracy'.

Isn't that what you want anyway?

0 points

Don't read his content. I'm a Democrat

Oh look it's miss centrist flippity floppin' down the way again.

Do you know what they call a gay Jew??? A heblew...

Actually they are called jizzraelites.

If you knew you were innocent, would you obstruct the investigation?

If you knew you were a retard would you obstruct reality?

Well first of all it's important to realize that conservatives are being retarded when they say that democrats are Marxists. Most establishment democrats are barely different from conservatives.

Second of all it's important to realize that Marxists aren't conspiring to end christianity by force, because Marx basically said that the less stupid and uneducated the masses are the less they will believe in religion. It's more about showing people that religion is retarded through education than conspiring to destroy it in some sneaky or violent way.

3 points

Bernie Sanders is not a true socialist because actual socialism does not retain capitalism to the extent that his policies would. He is a social democrat which sounds similar and is not what he calls himself but it is technically what he is.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

That reminds me a lot of the netflix show Altered Carbon. But then I think that's how most people imagine the future would be if things like gene editing/saving memory, would be.

Most people are too shortsighted to really think about the future and realize that it will not at all be the same as how things are now. They assume there will be things like money or religion or other such type 0 civilization crap but in reality it will be either a fascist technocracy dystopia or it will be an RBE system similar to what the venus project portrays. Most people advocate for something more in the middle like capitalism or social democracy, but there is very good reasoning behind my conclusion that it must be one of two extremes when it comes to type one and beyond civilizations.

The more advanced a civilization becomes, the more technical it must become in order to be well organized and handle it's own potential for altering it's environment. This means that the social constructs, institution, and overall superstitious human mindset will no longer be a factor, which means the human race must evolve collectively and create a socialistic technocracy system or a few will evolve and the rest will be used and done away with and it will result in a fascist technocracy system.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
2 points

Do you think it should be done by a private practice? How safe do you believe it would be if the government didn't have a hand in it?

I don't think it should be done by a private practice, and if the government or corporations have a hand in it, it will be used for the benefit of the few at the expense of humanity as a whole. Humans have advanced technologically past the level that we've advanced psycho-socially and editing human genes in more minor ways will not be the end of the world but if we are still using the same socio-economic systems when the technology gets truly advanced it will result in the wealthy becoming a transhuman super-race and the majority of humans who can't afford biotechnological augmentation will become cattle.

2 points

Yes but it shouldn't be done by corporations or the government.

This is my body. I have the right to my body, and to live

Yes but sadly no one is obligated to give a shit in our current society unless you can pay them to save your sorry ass or get the insurance agency to do it.


1 of 4 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]