CreateDebate


LordofFacts's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of LordofFacts's arguments, looking across every debate.

Don't hate the player, hate the game.

Never liked that saying. The players are the ones that make the game what it is in the first place.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

I already told you the difference between debating to win in a 1v1 arena and debating to explore ideas in a casual arena.

I already explained the difference between sexual harassment and sexting.

0 points

Many of those one percenters vote Democrat. Why do you suppose that is?

Because democrats are capitalists.

If you actually believe the Left is not in bed with the Rich, while making you believe they are on the little guy's side... I have a bridge to sell you!

Democrats are not the left. They are welfare-capitalists, which makes them barely on the left. There is a lot more to both the left and right than you are aware of because America only allows a narrow part of the spectrum into mainstream politics.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

Why are you treating me like this?

Because you think lying is "superior strategy".

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

Aside from the Queen-angle, can I explore the other parts with you and how you are running the logic?

What do you call a ripped condom on the end of a dick?

the cum spangled banner.

But enough about the things you said you would do to me in PM last night. I would be happy to run my logic all over that ass. Where shall we begin?

when the media is 99% Liberal biased. The 1% Fox News could never overcome the entirety of the rest of the media.

Fox News is not one percent of the media, they are just the part of it that shills for the one percent the hardest. I can see why you would mix them up though.

Why can't it be 2 of the 3 or all 3 at once?

It can, it can even be none of them, but it usually is at least one of them.

Actually, I don't like either... .

Then ban all of Bronto's 500 alt accounts. You have already banned 500 of mine.

2 points

Have you ever considered that rich people are not rich because they are superior, but because they either have mass appeal, are good at cheating and lying or because of inheritance? Because in reality it's usually one of the three.

UK, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium and modern-day (not Communist) Cambodia are all examples of nations that are legally genuine Monarchies (army etc serve the monarch not the elected official) and yet are Democratic in practise.

They are not Monarchies, the monarchs are still respected and still have hereditary wealth but that doesn't make them monarchies.

I don't think you know what benevolence is.

I don't think you know what I know or what I think.

2 points

I do not want Stratocracy, no.

Then why do you openly support "benevolent" oligarchy you idocratic lying fuckstick.

2 points

I watched your video.. Dude. You really suck, and you're ugly too.

Actually I'm great and extremely handsome but it's cool cause' I know you're just a jealous European Atheist that looks like a bag of coffee grounds.

Gaining points on this website and bypassing the very debate-bans AND site-bans you abuse the non-alt-abusers not being able to do are 3 examples of you cheating the system here, snitching on your primary rival both in private and in public regularly and you defying your own principles.

Why do you point your nose to the sky and judge others like this when your primary debate tactics are deception and misrepresentation?

4 points

It is actually the worst political system there is

I can think of a few worse ones, like monarchy and fascism and almost every other system there is for that matter.

It always

What do you mean "it always" ? It has never even existed except in theory.

it denies human nature and political strategy

"Human nature" is largely determined by the environment the human exists in. Political strategy is largely determined by corrupt the system is, so I guess the answer is to let it stay corrupt huh?

doomed to end up as a Tyrannical Oligarchy that instead of being Plutocratic is instead 'Statocracy'.

Isn't that what you want anyway?

0 points

Don't read his content. I'm a Democrat

Oh look it's miss centrist flippity floppin' down the way again.

Do you know what they call a gay Jew??? A heblew...

Actually they are called jizzraelites.

If you knew you were innocent, would you obstruct the investigation?

If you knew you were a retard would you obstruct reality?

Well first of all it's important to realize that conservatives are being retarded when they say that democrats are Marxists. Most establishment democrats are barely different from conservatives.

Second of all it's important to realize that Marxists aren't conspiring to end christianity by force, because Marx basically said that the less stupid and uneducated the masses are the less they will believe in religion. It's more about showing people that religion is retarded through education than conspiring to destroy it in some sneaky or violent way.

3 points

Bernie Sanders is not a true socialist because actual socialism does not retain capitalism to the extent that his policies would. He is a social democrat which sounds similar and is not what he calls himself but it is technically what he is.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
1 point

That reminds me a lot of the netflix show Altered Carbon. But then I think that's how most people imagine the future would be if things like gene editing/saving memory, would be.

Most people are too shortsighted to really think about the future and realize that it will not at all be the same as how things are now. They assume there will be things like money or religion or other such type 0 civilization crap but in reality it will be either a fascist technocracy dystopia or it will be an RBE system similar to what the venus project portrays. Most people advocate for something more in the middle like capitalism or social democracy, but there is very good reasoning behind my conclusion that it must be one of two extremes when it comes to type one and beyond civilizations.

The more advanced a civilization becomes, the more technical it must become in order to be well organized and handle it's own potential for altering it's environment. This means that the social constructs, institution, and overall superstitious human mindset will no longer be a factor, which means the human race must evolve collectively and create a socialistic technocracy system or a few will evolve and the rest will be used and done away with and it will result in a fascist technocracy system.

LordofFacts(163) Clarified
2 points

Do you think it should be done by a private practice? How safe do you believe it would be if the government didn't have a hand in it?

I don't think it should be done by a private practice, and if the government or corporations have a hand in it, it will be used for the benefit of the few at the expense of humanity as a whole. Humans have advanced technologically past the level that we've advanced psycho-socially and editing human genes in more minor ways will not be the end of the world but if we are still using the same socio-economic systems when the technology gets truly advanced it will result in the wealthy becoming a transhuman super-race and the majority of humans who can't afford biotechnological augmentation will become cattle.

2 points

Yes but it shouldn't be done by corporations or the government.

This is my body. I have the right to my body, and to live

Yes but sadly no one is obligated to give a shit in our current society unless you can pay them to save your sorry ass or get the insurance agency to do it.


2 of 7 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]