Well, you are asking for proof of the existence of The Truth which in itself is evidence that you believe in truth.
If you actually believe in truth, you by necessity believe in The Truth, because if The Truth doesn't exist, there can be no truth.
So really it looks to me like you are having a hard time admitting that you actually do believe The Truth exists.
If you were totally ignorant of the laws of mathematics, would that mean that these laws are not true?
If no one knew these laws, would that mean they are not true?
Truths are discovered, they don't pop into existence only when they are known. They existed beforehand.
Knowledge is not truth.
You got it.
Knowledge is inherently subjective.
So there is a difference between a known truth and an unknown truth, but an unknown truth isn't untrue simply because it is not known.
The Truth itself is something that absolutely cannot be known, because it wouldn't be what it is if it was known. That said, we can at least know that it exists.
I don't know or care about Deepak Chopra, but if he is saying what I am saying, how does that make what I'm saying any less true?
You say my words are gibberish like someone who only knows English might call Korean gibberish.
It isn't that what I'm saying is gibberish to you, it is that you either don't understand or refuse to understand.
It's very simple
What you know to be The Truth is not the same thing as what The Truth is in actuality.
If you can't see that, there are children with more insight than you, and you should be ashamed of your haughtiness.
But I think more highly of you than that, and I believe that you are capable of believing The Truth with sincerity.
If I said, "The sky is blue", a blind person could say, "that makes no sense"
If I said, "the number 5 comes after 4" a mathematical fool might say, "that makes no sense."
You saying I make no sense is not an argument. You are only saying that you can't make sense of what I am saying.
So what exactly are you having trouble comprehending? What do you find confusing about what I just said?
What is in accordance with fact or reality is that we are all wrong and don't see things as they truly are.
To admit this is to admit sin.
God is That Which Truly Is.
The Truth is eternal always existing
A truth in contrast is contingent in relative things like circumstance and and perceptions. A truth was not always true and will not always be true, but is only true for a season.
If there is a truth though, it could only be so if The Truth was somewhere in it. Killing a truth doesn't kill The Truth.
It is nonsense to you because you can't make sense of it.
What is nonsense to you is not nonsense to me.
You do after all say I have my truth, and you have your truth.
If you deny The Truth, which is greater than your personal truth or my personal truth, it stands to reason that you lack good sense.
But of course, you wouldn't be so foolish as to deny truth greater than your truth? You are of course, a man of reason who doesn't hold the truth in arbitrariness, right?