Conservatives donate almost double to the poor.
Another spectacular distortion of the facts. Conservatives donate to the Church, which in turn donates to the poor. Minus gifts to the Church, Democrats give significantly more to charity than Conservatives do.
What Nom doesn't understand is that he is a multiple type troll.
And you decided that the best way to "prove" that was to come in here and troll me?
Goodbye bronto. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Peter Strzok and Fusion GPS is proven common knowledge.
Nothing you say is "common knowledge" to anybody without a swastika tattoo.
Nope
Yup.
Oprah claims the school scandal happened
Oprah can claim whatever she likes. A court of law acquitted the accused. How is it possible that when discussing Trump you respect due legal process, but when discussing Oprah you do not even respect a full court acquittal?
So show us 75 guilty verdicts.
Show us 75 smoking chimneys without also showing us a fire.
Both of my allegations are proven.
Liar. Oprah has not been convicted of any wrongdoing. If an allegation is enough to prove something, then by the same definition Trump is guilty of four rapes.
The girls school scandal happened, and she admits it happened. Google it.
OK bronto.
Woman acquitted in Oprah school scandal
Wait for rebuttal.
Is that what you think you are doing? Ahahahaha!
You are mad, bronto. Mad.
Hillary Clinton claims to be a Goldwater girl.
Hitler was a hero because.... Genghis Khan! Vlad The Impaler!!
Oh no wait. Attacking someone else does not make the person I am defending good. Go figure.
Hey I thought I was fact machine!!!!
Hi @FactMachine.
Bye @FactMachine.
Unproven
Ah, the Bill Cosby defence. Interesting. So you attack Oprah with unproven allegations but then you have a problem when someone does the exact same thing to Trump? Are you even for real?
You cannot be taken seriously when you have one set of standards for discussing Trump and the literal opposite set of standards for discussing Oprah. When you discuss opponents of Trump, the most overt fake news blogs and fascist propaganda memes suddenly become all the proof you need to convict someone. The perfect example is Hillary Clinton. Or Muslims.
Normal for all billionaires
Interesting. So becoming a billionaire requires one to break the law 75 times?
How is it even possible that your first sentence reads, "unproven" and your second is a ridiculous claim for which you have provided no proof?
The dossier was fake
Ahahahahahahahaha!
President Trump is racist only in the frenzied minds of liberals.
He was sued by the federal government for systematic housing discrimination against blacks. There are thousands, THOUSANDS of pages of evidence incriminating him as a racist. His father was also a notorious racist so the apple does not fall far from the tree.
Your neo-Nazi propaganda is insulting to the memory of everybody who died fighting you wingnuts the first time.
‘No Vacancies’ for Blacks: How Donald Trump Got His Start, and Was First Accused of Bias
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/
A bit vague for my taste Con. By moral do you mean having the same hump buddy boyfriend for decades without marrying him
I think he means who has the smallest number of neo-Nazis and KKK activists supporting their political policies.
You must have missed the Orah girls' school scandal.
Ahahahahahaha!.
You must have missed the four rapes, seventy five open legal cases, dozens of sexual assaults, the treason against the United States, the attacks against everybody who investigates, the Federal Government's case for housing discrimination, the jokes about disabled and black people and the fact that his voting base consists of southern white supremacists and KKK members.
In a 2007 deposition, Trump admitted he had borrowed “a small amount” from his father’s estate: ‘I think it was like in the $9 million range.” And as Trump’s casinos ran into trouble, Trump’s father also purchased $3.5 million gaming chips, but did not use them, so the casino would have enough cash to make payments on its mortgage — a transaction which casino authorities later said was an illegal loan.
I seen you claiming their is 70 genders 1 time.
Hi @FactMachine.
Bye @FactMachine.
There is a 100% consensus that climate change is real
And there is a 97 percent consensus that climate change is being caused by humans, so what's your point?
Oh, you don't have one? How unusual.
I do not deny that the climate is changing.
The 97 percent scientific consensus is not that "the climate is changing" you impossibly dishonest buffoon. The consensus is that "human activities" are causing the radical climate problems witnessed over the last century.
No--but "Science Denier" is a somewhat appropriate label based on many of your other positions.
You are a lying troll. I have never denied any form of science at any time on this website, which explains why you were unable to provide any examples to support your bitter personal attack. The opposite is in fact true (i.e. that you frequently deny science). This can be proven by, among other things, your claim that "The flow of time is an illusion". See:-
http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/
I am banning you for being pathetic. You cannot best me in fair debate and that is exactly why you lie so much. To be perfectly frank, you are a complete failure held together by nothing but ego.
Nomenclature is a science denier
I gave you an official statement from NASA and you responded by posting an article called "Flawed Climate Models" by two men who do not have a SINGLE SCIENTIFIC QUALIFICATION BETWEEN THEM.
Liar.
Consensus on what?
The very statement itself explains what the consensus is.
You know damned well that formulating a hypothesis is not demonstrating a conclusion.
You know damned well that we are not talking about a "hypothesis".
Rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver.
https://climate.nasa.gov/
That is not a hypothesis, so take your upside down neo-Nazi language and choke on it pal. You are a common liar.
I underlined the critical language that shows that NASA recognizes that 97% of climate scientists have agreed on the hypothesis.
Marcus, when I want to know the opinion of NASA I will ask NASA, not a pathetic global warming denier who wants to misrepresent NASA.
Nomenclature is a science denier.
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.
Official statement from 18 different top scientific associations:-
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)
https://climate.nasa.gov/
Just like every other Nazi here Marcus, when your argument fails you resort to simply turning the truth upside down.
Are you mad?
Reagan funded terrorist states in Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. He labelled them "fledgling democracies". In El Salvador, the government literally sent out roving military death squads at night to execute dissidents and their families.
Under Reagan's leadership, the United States of America became the only state in recorded history to be convicted of international terrorism after the world court ruled it had "unlawfully used force" in the bombing of Nicaragua.
He willingly traded with and aided apartheid South Africa, even sidestepping congressional legislation aimed at stopping him.
He oversaw the selling of arms to Iran, including HAWK and TOW missiles.
He sold chemical and biological weapons to Saddam Hussein. The exact same chemical and biological weapons Saddam used to gas his own people.
Under Reagan, the American CIA became a drug smuggling operation to rival the top Colombian cartels.
How about you start another thread and ask if Hitler was the best leader of Germany in modern history? You know you want to. Secretly.
The leftist media's approval rating is like 12%.
Every lie that you tell and every myth that you proliferate just proves my point. Professors Ed Herman and Noam Chomsky proved that the media is not "leftist" in 1988, after an exhaustive study of the last half century's worth of American media, using multiple academic methodologies. I must have made this point to you four or five times, but every single day you ignore this fact and tell the exact same lie!
The Myth of the Liberal Media: An Edward Herman Reader
https://www.amazon.com/
