You must be feeling retarded, there is evidence of people being born LGBT and evidence against it because both and neither is true. You have simply selected a source that supports what you want to believe without looking into anything else or really thinking about it because you don't care about truth.
What you are attracted to is not a genetic trait, but you can also be predisposed to being attracted to certain things or change at a certain point in your life. This is proven by simply observing gay people because there are some who become gay and others who are literally born with certain traits which consistently occur in other gays such as being effeminate, being a stereotypical "lispy queer" etc.
If you have any shred of reason in your entire being, why don't you explain the science and logic based reasons you believe in Jesus.
How it works is you can be born essentially destined to be gay but no one is born knowing if they are attracted to dicks or not if you know what I mean. People can spontaneously become gay later in life OR be born with certain traits which predispose them to lust for penis. As a somewhat bisexual person who is mostly attracted to females I kind of feel like sexuality is more flexible than people make it out to be. People get an idea in their heads of what they like (usually what they're "supposed" to like and sometimes the opposite) and stick to that but everyone is bisexual deep down inside. Any woman can love boobies and any man can love penis, it's just a matter of how you perceive it.
without flying into a rage simply because you cannot even formulate a defense such is your stupidity
I formulate a defense AND fly into a rage, thank you very much.
I bet after 8 moves against the weakest opponents the board is turned over and you fly into a tantrum at yet another defeat
My win rate is very inconsistent. Sometimes I ass-pull wins against opponents that should be better and other times I make stupid mistakes.
his coming from Leftist's who deny the science of Biology
I don't deny the science of biology. That would be the ones claiming all life on earth was created in less than 7 days by a sky wizard.
and actually believe that two men having sex is a natural normal sexual orientation.
Everything that exists is natural and "normal" does not matter in the slightest.
Talk about a Left wing Liberal cult telling it's believers to follow the Political correct dogma.
But I'm a politically incorrect communist and you're a retarded kyke-loving faggot.
Once again, I'd characterize him as a vacuous pop rapper and not a capitalist rapper. Has he ever rapped about the merits of capitalism as opposed to other systems?
Although they are too retarded to be consciously political they are clearly capitalists since all they care about is money and in their retarded world capitalism is all that makes sense to them. They are a great example of what capitalism leads to, hyper-materialistic spoiled little faggots with no merit whatsoever running around with millions of dollars while children starve in the street and they promote nothing but consumerism and stupidity.
How so? Sadly lots of people are stupid enough to love such songs.
And that is exactly why you are often rewarded specifically for being stupid in capitalism.
He criticized capitalism in that link you just gave so maybe you're right, that would be a shame as he seemed reasonably intelligent.
Many people who are reasonably intelligent are socialists, but almost all top-tier geniuses are socialists.
Just because the current iteration of a system is flawed doesn't mean the ideas behind capitalism
There has never been any form of capitalism other than plutocracy except for very small, isolated cases that never last. This is not just the current iteration, what you are seeing is the norm for capitalism.
free exchange, property rights and self-ownership of one's labor are bad.
Capitalism was created by wealthy people who already had wealth who were sick of being lorded over by lords just as feudalism was created by lords who were sick of being lorded over by kings. The thing about all those things you mentioned is that your ability to profit from them depends on how much profit you already have.
How can there be free exchange when wealth essentially determines the level of freedom you have?
What good are property rights if they allow a handful of robber-baron types to own all the important land and resources and thus have the state AND the people by the balls?
How do you "own your own labour" when you are in the working class and a large portion of the wealth you produce is stolen by someone who may or may not have worked a single day in their life and may or may not have had the money to start a business simply by inheriting wealth?
Capitalism has a hidden caste system embedded deep within it. When you are handed wealth and opportunities as a result of having wealthy parents, you can start businesses and make a profit much more easily, but when you are born into poverty or even into the middle class the ones who currently occupy the beorgiosie position will have you by the balls working for them 9/10 times and you will never have the chance to own your own labour.
This is something socialists are all too quick to point out when anybody points to socialism's historical failure, it's a complete double standard.
Socialism has only been implemented a handful of times, and it's failures in those cases are not inherent to the system itself but due to many factors which I would be happy to point out if you have any specific examples in mind. Most of the time though, when a nation is called socialist, that is either a lie on the part of the ones implementing the system used to sneak in a fascist regime under the guise of a movement for equality, or it is a total conflation by capitalists who don't know what socialism is. For example, Venezuela is not socialist but capitalists love to point to it as a socialist failure because they are so stupid and dishonest they think any system where the state partially owns the means of production is socialist.
You are a very confused individual. You mistakingly think that nazi germany was national socialism rather than fascism and follow the words of Hitler who was a fascist cunt pretending to be a social democrat. You also do not seem to be overly racist yet use rhetoric that a racist would as a result of listening to the wrong people.
I'd say this is more about pop rappers vs political rappers. Is Lowkey actually socialist? I didn't hear anything about socialism in his song.
All capitalist rappers like lil' pump do is brag about how much money they have, even though they have no skills whatsoever and are the single greatest proof that capitalism is not a meritocracy.
Lowkey is a socialist as far as I know but his more politically focused raps are less rhyme-heavy because he is more concerned with being understood than with making you go "ooooooh dayum"
What are your feelings on doing experiments on lesser lifeforms like insects, worms, etc?
I condone doing experiments on Bronto because insects and worms are still sentient beings, bronto is just a mindless biological robot that is programmed to repeat right wing propaganda.
Amen! I'm sorry for being wrong for so long.. I'm not a liberal anymore.
You're more wrong now, I don't know what kind of propaganda you've been consuming but it's pretty clear that some disgustingly dishonest and stupid militant right wing christian website or something has convinced you that all left wingers are devil worshipers. Being a liberal is not so good, but being a centrist or conservative is even worse.
but you want to single out people from certain countries though, and if these countries become the hermit-theocracies you want to make them then no one will be able to get out of the sick culture you are so afraid of and thus more people will be raised in a theocratic rape-hole which produces more rapists. There needs to be a way for people to assimilate into less rape-inducing cultures so that the non-rapists and potential victims can get out of rape-land.
