You is racist by finding the whitest, most albino picture you could find as your profile pic fam.
Severus Snape has very dark hair and eyes, and not the palest skin in the world despite being pale. I could find one that is way more white if I wanted to.
Was your extremely white plan to avoid it?
My plan was purple you colorblind idiot.
We both know you aren't hanging around alphas or black folks.
I don't hang around anyone because people irritate me.
You are pretending to be a youtuber. Half of your alts are based on right wing youtubers and talk show hosts and this one is a youtuber.
The obvious flaw in this logic is that in the examples, people are falling into the judgement of God per omniscient morality.
So the unborn deserve to be punished for the sins of their parents, God can do whatever he wants and it's good no matter what because he's god, and the blatant examples of god allowing humans to abort and requiring only that the father be compensated by the wife financially for the loss of "property" don't exist because you can't think or read. gotcha
That's a nonsense comment. Looking at your posts, there's no way in hell you even know an alpha G.
Being a big black guy does not make you a G or an alpha, especially if you're only pretending to be the big black guy on the internet.
No betas understand women.
Most self-proclaimed alphas are betas.
Looks like a jealous hate yo.
What in the name of Stephen Hawkings butt crack makes you think I would be jealous of you obsessively emulating and mindlessly believing in every right wing shill on youtube?
Ten biblical episodes and prophecies provide an unequivocal expression of God's attitude toward human life, especially the ontological status of "unborn children" and their pregnant mothers-to-be. Brief summaries:
• A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).
• The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).
• God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53).
• Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12).
• King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16).
• Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18).
• For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8).
• God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16).
• For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16).
• Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19).
How obsessed would you say you are with right wing youtubers on a scale from 1 to 10. Because I would estimate it's about an 11 considering how you have at least 40 accounts based on emulating them.
Most men who claim to be alpha on the internet don't understand women, especially if they are using it to sell something.
Yep, you're trolling
You are the one who believes things just because an ancient book says them but ignores all the other books which say different things. I am obviously a real person, five points from whichever house you're in.
The only reason you could possibly not like it is if you are too stupid or lazy to make money in the easiest system in history to make money in.
The main reason I don't like capitalism is because it's not meritocratic enough. Stupid and lazy people often have a lot of money and people who are smarter than them and work harder often have less. I believe that inheritance should not be a thing, and that everyone should be born entitled to the same things but by the time they are adults they should have to earn everything. No one should be born into wealth, no one should be born into poverty, and no adult should be on any form of welfare or be making money without actually doing anything of inherent use.
Now it's your turn to waste your time typing and my turn not to read it. Have a shitty life you piece of shit. Mingi hasn';t replied today so I'm pretty much done here.
But I don't care what you think about me. That's why I'm calm and you're in a violent rage.
You are deeply enraged at all times just like I am you liar. The difference is that I am brutally honest about both myself and others whereas you are constantly projecting a fake image of yourself while trying to harm others in any way you can.
Then why are you the one having a temper tantrum and I the one who is being calm and reasonable?
You are acting calm and reasonable, but you are neither. I am truly angry and not afraid to admit it.
You're a total waste of my time.
You're a total waste of the earth's resources and should kys.
You said you were going to leave the site
I was going to, but just after I said that I noticed Mingiwuwu PMed me and I am in an ongoing conversation with him so I am staying for now.
Every word which has left your mouth in the last two weeks has been false.
Dude, you literally misinterpreted every word of my argument deliberately to avoid my correctness. You are fucking human waste.
Keep your promise to leave and go away you loser.
Stop fucking telling me to leave or I'll be stuck here forever. If you insist on me leaving I won't be able to out of spite. Also, you are a fucking loser not me. You are in your forties and sitting on the computer in this same dead forum after 3 years. What have you done with your life? I have a legitimate plan to change the system which you refused to be a part of, you never even had a plan never mind actually doing anything. You're not even a journalist, just a professional grammar Nazi who fakes being intellectual.
Every word that you write causes my opinion of you to sink lower. You are a big, grown-ass baby.
I feel the exact same towards you. You are about ego, not truth.
I didn't agree with you.
You did, you upvoted me frequently even when I said things you never even remotely said.
Obviously you do. You seem to be in a great deal of pain.
Nah, I am just tired of everything at this point. There is pain and loneliness in me I'm not gonna lie, but I am becoming more numb to it with time. Where there once was sorrow there is now mostly anger, disgust and apathy. You see, I never actually considered you my friend either, I merely wanted you to be my friend. I tested you and you disappointed me but I was ready for it the whole time.
You have literally misrepresented everything INTENTIONALLY to avoid honest debate. You really should just fucking kill yourself. You tried it before, why don't you go through with it this time you pathetic, idiotic dick head? Your puny intellect is hiding behind a wall of fancy words, dishonest arguments and credible sources that you use to appear intellectual. In reality you are worthless and retarded just like your parents told you and you should just fucking die.
take responsibility for your own behaviour, like adults do.
You have never done that. Go ahead and apologize for all the rude things you have said to me and admit that science is not a religion.
You understand very little about my character
You are a pseudo-intellectual cunt who knows I am right but can't bear to admit it due to your own ego. You are a sociopath with a fragile ego who wants to feel morally and intellectually superior to others. You ran away from home because your mommy was mean to you and you are fascinated by Jordan Peterson because you find parallels between his theories and your own pathology, namely that you were neglected by the mother archetype leading you into a false version of what socialism is supposed to be. You are a socialist not out of reason or compassion, but because on a deeper psychological level you want to equalize the level of neglect you experienced. Your fundamental childish psychology is basically saying "I want everyone to be equally miserable if I cannot be equally happy".
I will give you one final chance to read and respond with intellectual honesty before I ignore everything you ever write to me for the rest of eternity just as you have ignored me.
Religion is a social-cultural system of designated behaviors and practices, morals, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, or spiritual elements.- Wikipedia
Science (from the Latin word scientia, meaning "knowledge")[1] is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[2][3][4]- Wikipedia
You have (with great dishonesty) appealed to semantics to cling to your original argument, and while your attempts to justify calling science a religion make sense semantically (to an extent) they do not make sense in the reality that exists beyond mere words. Not all ideology is religious in nature and nothing could be farther from religion than science. This is not to say that science is an ideology, because it's not that either. Firstly, religion deals specifically with the spiritual/metaphysical whereas science deals specifically with the material world. Second, science is by definition a process of figuring out what the truth is rather than a claim as to what the truth is. The closest science comes to being an ideology is the fact that there are certain ideological perspectives that lead to science being conceived, but as I already explained you do not have to believe in those perspectives to USE the METHODOLOGY of science because science is a system to be used rather than a statement to be believed. Everything you have said about me is projection, you cannot admit you are wrong so you play semantical games to put a systematic process designed to uncover truths about physical reality in the same category as a mindless faith in supernatural garbage.
Take responsibility for your own behaviour.
You will have earned the right to say that when you learn how to admit when you are wrong about things and apologize for the dickish things you say as I have done. Until then you are the infantile moron projecting his own stupidity and dickery onto others.
You pushed me to saying something like that because I wanted you as a true friend and ally on an IRL level and you always used me as someone to upvote and agree with you on this forum and saw me as nothing more than that. I have come to realize that you never saw me as a friend nor are you that intelligent, you have just managed to memorize some big words and side with the right schools of thought making you appear truly intelligent despite being nothing special when it comes to actually thinking.
And you are cold and empty inside, which is why you try to make other people feel that way too.
Literally everything you've said to me over the past few days is pure projection, it's really fascinating. I disagree with you about one thing and all of the sudden you think I'm a total idiot even though you know deep down inside that I at least have a point even if you believe your own bullshit. I knew that you have some problems in certain areas when it comes to logic and that you never really considered me your friend but this is just too much. In terms of both stupidity and being a dick you are truly crossing the fucking line.
I will give you one final chance to read and respond with intellectual honesty before I ignore everything you ever write to me for the rest of eternity just as you have ignored me.
Religion is a social-cultural system of designated behaviors and practices, morals, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, or spiritual elements.- Wikipedia
Science (from the Latin word scientia, meaning "knowledge")[1] is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[2][3][4]- Wikipedia
You have (with great dishonesty) appealed to semantics to cling to your original argument, and while your attempts to justify calling science a religion make sense semantically (to an extent) they do not make sense in the reality that exists beyond mere words. Not all ideology is religious in nature and nothing could be farther from religion than science. This is not to say that science is an ideology, because it's not that either. Firstly, religion deals specifically with the spiritual/metaphysical whereas science deals specifically with the material world. Second, science is by definition a process of figuring out what the truth is rather than a claim as to what the truth is. The closest science comes to being an ideology is the fact that there are certain ideological perspectives that lead to science being conceived, but as I already explained you do not have to believe in those perspectives to USE the METHODOLOGY of science because science is a system to be used rather than a statement to be believed. Everything you have said about me is projection, you cannot admit you are wrong so you play semantical games to put a systematic process designed to uncover truths about physical reality in the same category as a mindless faith in supernatural garbage.
Jesus loves you
You don't even know if Jesus exists or not, you just want to believe in him because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.
Jews killed off the old Russian royalty in the Bolshevik communist revolution.
How is that a bad thing? Off with their heads, I say. The world has no place for Monarchs who are handed wealth and power through inheritance and use it to oppress and exploit.
Many doctors are Jewish, and they are not hurting anyone.
lol, many doctors are hurting people whether they're Jewish or not. They want to sell you drugs and surgery to pay off their yachts.
but because I am a Christiannnnnnnnnnnnnn (follower of Christ), who is Jewish, I am not allowed to speak ill of Jews or Israel.
Jesus himself spoke ill of Jews, he thought that many of them were corrupt and not true believers. Disliking individual Jews is not the same as hating Jews in general.
Not only are you "allowed" in christianity to "speak ill" of Israel if it becomes corrupt, but whether or not christianity allows you to do something shouldn't even factor into it because christianity is just an irrational belief system with no basis in reality.
I as a centrist, do nnnnnnnnnnnnnot agree with any far left or far right government, in Israel, US, or any other country,
Israel is far right. You are also not a moderate or a centrist because you say purely right wing things such as "leftists are professional victims" and "Hitler was a socialist". Only right wingers say those things.
People on the earth can never find out how the creature began and life was from.
Evolution isn't about explaining where life in general came from, it's about explaining how new species are created. We may never know for sure how life began on earth with 100�rtainty but that's different from figuring out the mechanism through which speciation occurs.
The fable of evolution can never prove them.
Evolution is not a fable, it's a strongly supported theory. The genetics and anatomy of all creatures are related to other creatures that exist in both past and present in ways that are too significant to be coincidental.
why can't someone create some creatures? (even can't basic organism!)
Because we don't know and can only speculate what processes lead to life being created from non-living matter. There is direct evidence for the theory of evolution though.
Evolution is fake perfectly. It is not science and a law. It is just a hypothesis. (even it is not a theory.) I am an atheist, but I can never believe the bad "story".
How do you think life got the way it is?
So what they are saying is that God should treat everyone the same and make it heaven on earth regardless our selfish irresponsible choices in life.
You are completely ignoring the fact that there are 5 year olds with cancer, and ones who are born into poverty or blown up by invading armies before they have a chance to make any choices. Your argument is automatically stupid because the mentally ill have no choice in being mentally ill either and there are clearly many people suffering who can't be said to deserve it. You are quite obviously incapable of even the most basic semblance of rational thought.
The Bible speaks many times to the sins of mankind
Yes, now that you mention it the bible calls all humans sinners. I suppose your basis for the argument above is that all humans are trash who deserve to suffer inherently unless they grovel at the feet of the being who deliberately designed them to be so flawed that they supposedly deserve to be tortured in hell by default until they are "saved".
CHOOSES CHOOSES CHOOSES CHOOSES
Shut up you retarded parrot. No one makes choices before they are born that would warrant them getting cancer while they are babies or being born in abject poverty. You are a worthless, regressive sack of shit who doesn't even deserve to exist for being so fucking stupid.
Liberalism, Progressivism is all built on a no fault anything goes ideology
Conservatives ignore the root cause of people's choices because they are stuck in primitive mindsets about human behavior and full of outdated notions such as free will and sin. Nothing in neuroscience directly supports the notion that humans have free will and there is much more of a basis for the idea that we are largely the psychological product of our experiences and genes. In your world, people will always just randomly choose to do bad things and will need to be punished for it. In my progressive world, we look at the reason WHY people do things and try to mitigate their psychological issues rather than merely lock them in a cage.
When a child dies, we wonder why God lets this happen. In God's eyes he is saving that child from 70 years of hardships and rewarding them with Heaven this very moment! All children go to Heaven.
It's that kind of "logic" that leads people to kill kids.
I can't bear your idiocy
I need a bare titty to squeeze
Outlaw, you're a shitty disease
you deserve a bullet to the knee
Democrats were born into mental illness by the parents that hatched them.
Democrats, retched rats, they want to take our MAGA hats
The left is stacked against the facts, America needs less of that
a gun cannot pull it's own trigger you incessant sacks
of poorly digested crap left entrapped in the small intestine tract
yes I'm back on an alt, you're gettin' scratched with the salt
on the claws of the cat that assaulted you,
plus there's massive revolting package of faults
I unpack from the back of your skull and unmask your subconscious, revealing that you lack by default
the capacity for intelligent thought, never mind a comeback or insult
that can match what I've got
you'd rather get stabbed in the crotch
than listen to Outlaw rap when it's launched
directly at you as a response
when you act like a nonce
Now that you have turned on me and won't even read or address anything I say I don't see a point to coming here anymore. Have fun with what little remains here.
No, you're a twit.
I see, from this all I take is that you are the one who is a twit and that we are officially enemies again. I will always be the winner at the end of the day because I have learned things here and everyone else merely pontificates while refusing to accept anything they hear from those who disagree with them. I believe there's a saying about a smart person learning more from a fool than a fool will ever learn from a smart person.
RBE,
There is very good grounds for my "belief" in RBE, which in reality is not a belief but something I see as 99% of the way to being factual but I could be wrong. Really what it is is that I know that at a certain point a civilization will start to resemble technocracy once it becomes advanced enough. The reason why I know this is because type 0 humans are retarded superstitious apes and that our societies run by social constructs, opinions, and individuals seeking to enrich themselves with social construct points are illogical and incompatible with reason and truly advanced civilization. It could very well be that this technocracy resembles fascism more than socialism or some other system beyond human imagining but I think it stands to reason that it will ultimately end up as one extreme or the other (fascism or socialism) depending on what happens in the decades leading up to the transition between technologically advanced monkey stage and type 1 civilization.
socialism
If socialism is not possible than caring about politics is ultimately pointless because bullshit will always win at the end of the day. Just as with RBE though there is strong evidence indicating that it is possible and that humans are currently just too stupid for it.
eating raw meat
I don't "believe" in eating raw meat. I just do it. It is a fact that certain nutrients are destroyed when you cook them, that not all raw meat is inherently dangerous, and that carcinogens are created when you cook meat making it objectively better to eat certain animal products raw.
the teachings of Jacques Fresco
His teachings are mostly observations, he is not a person with many opinions.
the internet
The internet exists just as much as anything else in this reality.
underground rap culture
How is that a belief? I like listening to rap and find that underground rap tends to be more intelligent and lyrically advanced. Don't try to say that it's subjective either because K-Rino is better than Lil' Pump in the same way that Mozart is better than a 4 year old banging on pots and pans.
on the thin line between genius and schizophrenia
I should probably just accept that I am a genius, because other than true geniuses everyone I consider as just as if not more intelligent than me turns out to have many points of retardation and douche baggery in comparison to myself.
When you grow up poor you are more likely to stay poor not only because you lack the privileges and access to business education that rich kids are handed through no merit of their own but also because you are forced into a cycle of debt and wage slavery just to keep a roof over your head. Intelligence plays less of a roll than those factors since even an idiot can understand the nature of business if they are well-studied and have the opportunity to even start a business in the first place. The poor are also more likely to be malnourished or have a negative experience of life both of which can negatively impact IQ, which in and of itself proves capitalism's lack of meritocracy as it actively forces people to be an inferior version of themselves then blames them for their own failures while handing more and more to the successful merit-free the more they climb the class ladder by exploiting the blood sweat, and ingenuity of the working class.
Why do you like to make up stories and pretend to cite actual news?
Just let me know what group you belong to and I'll move it up on the list ;)
I belong to the group that is smart enough to know you are a lighthearted troll and that nothing you say is truly offensive because it is a joke.
Bullshit. All leftist do is act like professional victims.
You certainly have a nuanced and original perspective there. Where did you learn that one, Steven Crowder? A lot smarter people than him would disagree with him on a great many things. You should hear them out before you start basing your ideology on right wing talk shows.
Your problem is that, because you believe something, you automatically assume it to be objectively true. Which, basically, is the same problem everybody who isn't a twit has.
So now FM "isn't a twit" after you just spent the last two days calling him an idiot? I appreciate your assertion, but I actually do my best not to believe in anything. This is key to being as objective as humanly possible. You don't understand at all how I think, I literally don't believe in anything at the end of the day. It is extremely stressful to think like I do and it makes me both insane and more sane than the average human. It is difficult to explain, I am on the thin line between genius and schizophrenia. You have no idea how wrong your statement is because the root of it all is how I constantly question and second guess everything.
Science uses various qualitative and quantitative methodologies because it is an ideology
I understand that there is an underlying philosophy behind science. You don't have to believe in that philosophy to use scientific methodology. Like you said before science is not the pinnacle of evolution and I see it as something to be used and recognized for the validity it has rather than something to blindly adhere to. It is unscientific to "believe" in things both philosophically and in practice and it is stupid to think science alone can unveil all the answers. Science itself encourages you not to believe in it whereas religion demands blind adherence.
You are running around in circles because you're a petulant child who has been having temper tantrums ever since I beat you at chess.
You are truly living inside your own head when you say such bullshit. Ever since you falsely accused me of cheating you have led our relationship into a downward spiral by your very own wild faith based irrational assumptions of unscientific stupidity.
So is Christianity, moron.
Christianity is not a methodology for figuring things out, it is a series of faith based conclusions about reality. Science requires no faith because it isn't a belief, it is a process of trying to explain things and testing those explanations.
They are not mutually exclusive, moron. They are the exact same thing.
No, religion and methodology are not the same thing. A belief in a conclusion and a process which seeks to reach a conclusion are not the same thing. You're a pseudo-intellectual dick faced cunt.
Science is a form of ideology.
Science is a tool for figuring things out, not a belief system. You in no way need to adhere to any values or beliefs about nature to use scientific methodology.
It is as if you think science represents the absolute pinnacle of human evolution
Nothing I said suggests that.
You sound like you're 12 years old.
Fuck you. You said something bizarrely stupid out of the blue then started calling me an idiot when I challenged it. You cannot handle having your religious beliefs challenged it would seem.
Science: the religion that must not be questioned
That article supports my position more than yours. It is essentially about the dangers of mixing belief with science, not about how science requires belief. Religion typically has no real basis, an ideology may or may not have one, but science is all about the basis. If you think a system of seeking evidence is the same as a mindless faith based belief system you are once again retarded. Not all ideology is religious and science does not require belief, either accept this or prove me wrong.
All you want to do is argue and insult, even when you are wrong.
Address my arguments or shut up cunt. You are avoiding the fucking debate I'm trying to have with you because you are full of shit. You said that ideology is the same as religion and you said that science is an ideology. You are refusing to defend your position that science is a religion because you know it's fucking stupid and not at all true. Literally everything you just said is bullshit and you are the one running away from my extensive ass rape rather than meticulously engaging in the fucking debate like a man.
You must be a leftist
The left is superior because the further left you are the more you want to see all of humanity in it's best form rather than a wealthy elite running things according to what is best for themselves.
Yep. Still doesn't answer why you think science is a religion though you nutcase.
Thank you for exposing that, link this to Andy. Meanwhile reply to the main points in my "destroying Nom" debate while you're at it instead of running away like a self-affirming crotch nugget. I don't want to be your enemy or make myself superior to you, I only strongly disagree with you calling science and socialism religious.
One that either doesn't exist or isn't concerned about everyone's well being.
No. I had no opinion, because I did not know your belief
The people who tell you to support Israel and Saudi Arabia are the same ones who tell you that sanctions have nothing to do with Venezuela's economy and that Socialism and Fascism are the same thing.
So is saudi Arabia
Yep. Did you think I supported that abominable theocratic monarchy?
I think Israel is a far-right ethno-state that is killing people to steal land.
Maybe he was, he is a corporate-backed capitalist after all. You don't see any of the social democrat candidates doing that stuff because the more left wing you are the less likely you are to be a piece of shit.
You know who else had a pretty good approval rating? Hitler, particularly after he did bad things and tricked everyone into thinking it was good.
I feel that Monarchy/Feudalism is an oppressive system which exalts people based on arbitrary privilege rather than merit. If we declare independence we will have a chance at Liberal Democracy, which is far from perfect yet far superior to British tyranny. The British as a culture tend to be crude people who mask their barbaric nature with pseudo-intellectual words and an air of civility, and they are quick to conflate theory with fact and fact with faith. I think we should distance ourselves from such a culture, perhaps not entirely, but in many respects. In the version of history where I was one of the founding fathers though, let's try to beat them to the punch and establish Socialism in the US before the European countries do.
still having sleep problems, due to the season change
Are you sure it's not because of the fluoxetine (prozac) entering your pineal gland (which produces melatonin) and calcifying it? It's interesting you say this because I was just reading about the effects of fluoride (which is in prozac) on the pineal gland. The pineal gland is not separated from the rest of the bloodstream by the blood brain barrier so it is extra susceptible to every toxin and harmful substance that might be lurking in your blood stream. Prozac is tampering with your brain chemistry for the profit of big pharma, and is most likely responsible for changes in sleep as well as other symptoms you may be experiencing. I would suggest looking for the root cause of a problem and addressing it rather than getting brainwashed into taking mind control pills that merely mask certain symptoms whilst creating a whole list of new ones.
Women only have sex with men they have to look up to.
My neighbor has a wife who is taller than him and they have like 9 kids.
I have explained to you meticulously why it is and provided clear historical examples.
Science in and of itself is methodology. "Scientists" who "believe" in theories are not an example of science being an ideology, they are examples of so-called scientists being unscientific.
you're too pig-headed and narcissistic to admit being wrong.
You are literally the denying the possibility of someone appreciating the evidence (or lack thereof) behind a theory without having a "belief" one way or the other because you refuse to admit that science doesn't require faith.
I have ALREADY PROVEN THIS STATEMENT TO BE FALSE.
You have already spewed crap that you know is wrong out of pure stubborn egotistical penis sucking.
Go away. You're starting to annoy me.
You are objectively wrong and you referred to socialism as a religion which is sickening to me. (In case you try to play with semantics again you said the far left specifically which basically means socialism).
may or may not have any factual basis.
Exactly.
Belief is faith
That was never in question. what is in question is the idea that "factual basis" and faith/belief mesh well together.
If something is not a fact and you want to believe it is true then that requires faith.
When you don't know something, you can simply gauge it's likelihood and say "this is what I suspect, but I don't really know". Denying that there are grey areas between fact and blind faith is intellectually dishonest and fucking stupid. You are in fact being a stubborn tampon sucking dick head by denying this.
you agreed that "a good scientist" would be the first to tell you that nothing can be said to be an absolute fact
I said there is very little that people can truly call fact. As in relative to the amount of unknowns there aren't many things that are truly known but facts can be known.
Second of all, it is one of the most fundamental tenets of philosophy that nothing can irrefutably be proven to be a fact
Depends on your school of thought.
Yo mama is so fat that the LDL cholesterol was crushed out of her veins by her sheer weight which saved her from a heart attack.
my lyrical flow is super sick like polio
don't be stupid don't be dumb and don't be fuckin' dopey bro
Prove it.
One example is neo-conservatives all agreeing with each other and believing the same exact bullshit from the same exact sources. Another example is the group-think that is patriotism which causes some people to identify so strongly with the collective that they cry every time they hear the national anthem.
No one on earth denies the very existence of collectives unless they are retarded. Literally everyone knows collectives exist. Literally all a collective is is a group that is unified in some way. The entire human race is a collective merely because we are all the same species but there are also millions of sub-collectives you could break it down into. There are also collectives everywhere else in nature, think about ants for instance or a beehive.
Sue them on First Amendment grounds
The first amendment is meaningless. First of all it's supposed to stop the government from silencing people which they still get away with doing regardless of the first amendment. Second of all the first amendment says nothing about privately owned businesses and websites not being able to make anti-free speech policies or ban you for your speech. Pretty much the only thing the first amendment protects is religion and the right of institutions to lie to the public since the government doesn't respect the free speech and most places you go both in person and via the internet are privately owned and have their own set of rules.
If nothing is fact then everything is ideology.
First of all it's not that nothing is fact, it's just that you have to be very rigorous in making sure something is a fact before you say it is.
Second of all there are other options besides fact or faith such as speculation and theory.
Third of all an ideology is not necessarily based on faith.
Fourth of all science is not an ideology nor does it require any form of belief or faith. As I already explained there is nothing about a theory which requires you to have faith in it and all the fact that many people do have faith in them proves is that those people are not truly scientific.
You still haven't replied to the science being an ideology thing and whatnot. I replied to you if you didn't notice (and if you did but you know what I mean).
All this proves is the power of propaganda in shaping public opinion.
What happened?
I was arguing with a bunch of idiots on the discussion forums and the admins must have not liked me bashing the status quo like a political wrecking ball. Many people there cuss like a drunken sailor and talk about controversial things so there is truly nothing they could have banned me for other than the admins having a political bias.
Read my answer. I was only discussing what actually happens IN PRACTICE.
JamesDD addressed this adequately.
Despite the values and goals (which you recounted accurately) of the USSR, the actual result was a highly stratified society with party leaders living lavishly at the top, and everybody else either suffering under crushing poverty, or in a gulag.
It's important to understand that the USSR got worse over time and also that a lot of the supposed horrors of the USSR are nothing but lies orchestrated by their capitalist political enemies and economic rivals during the cold war. The USSR essentially started out as a social democracy and degenerated into a proto-fascist state capitalist bureaucracy.
without accounting for basic realities about our species
The actual scientific truth is that there is no such thing as "human nature" beyond the mere biological reality of what a human is. It is you who is not taking into account how malleable and variable human behaviour is and how it is inextricably linked to environment and conditioning because you were programmed with outdated philosophical notions of the nature of man rather than the controversial scientific fact that we are biological mechanisms with no free will who are shaped by our genes and environment, both of which can be manipulated to create a more rational and productive species just as much as they can be manipulated to do the opposite.
Of course people will continue to need to rely on social constructs
Only if type 1 civilizations and beyond don't exist (which is unlikely) or humans are just plain incapable of reaching that level. Social constructs are for irrational unscientific type 0 monkeys.
The reason I think a democratic republic is in the ideal zone is that it simultaneously accounts for the natural human drive toward hierarchies, and people's competing desires for security and liberty. It institutionalizes compromise in a manageable system.
All you are saying is that you are settling for the current status quo and assuming no better system can be reached. It stands to reason that a capitalist democratic republic is just another step in socio-economic evolution rather than some eternal ultimate system just because that's what seems the best out of what we currently have and you can't imagine anything else.
I recognize that others live in this society, as well. That means that we must all compromise.
That's called socialism.
The only other option is that a few get exactly what they want to the detriment of the vast majority.
That's called capitalism.
If science were antithetical to faith then no scientific theory could ever be disproved, ever. It would always necessarily be accurate purely on the grounds that it was arrived at scientifically.
There is nothing about a theory which requires you to believe in it. That is why they are called theories and not facts. You are literally conflating theory with fact, which is incredulously titty blasted.
For hundreds of years people had faith in Newton's idea that time and space were universal constants, but Einstein proved that Newton was wrong and now people have faith in Einstein's idea instead
Both of their systems work to a certain extent yet have their limitations. They are called theories for a reason and no true scientific person "believes" in them but sees them as what they are, theories which are potentially subject to falsification.
Then if it isn't a fact you must have faith to believe it to be true. You are contradicting yourself. Shaddup.
You must be smoking some good shit right now bro. What strain? Knowledge of facts is antithetical to faith in beliefs. Think of it as a spectrum, the more faith it is the less basis it has and the more fact it is the more basis it has.
All ideology is religion. Even science.
Science is not an ideology, it is a methodology.
It all requires faith in something.
Science is antithetical to faith.
it requires faith what was true in the past
A true scientist knows that very little can be called "fact". Jacque Fresco said that there is no such thing as a scientific thinker, and I think what he meant is that being scientific is a continuous process rather than something that can be arrived at definitively. In other words true science has no "belief" to it because a true scientist never reaches a full conclusion until they are sure and they are forever aware that they are ultimately unsure. In this sense, most "scientists" are not scientists at all.
they become willing to do bad things in the interests of the religion. For example, if I offered the planet a fresh start with a global RBE and total equality for all, on the condition you kill a bunch of Conservative Monarchists who want a fascist state, what would you do?
Good point, but is that really "bad" ?
Your OBSESSION with me
I don't give a shit about you at all. Do you honestly think that I think about you just because I mentioned you briefly for the first time in like 2 months?
my large cock
I know that you have a very small cock, the reason I said that was to exemplify and exaggerate the arrogant bullshit you always say about yourself. As you've just shown however, it's not that much of an exaggeration.
Most people don't wanna hear about my extraordinary LARGE, women satisfying member..
Nobody believes you because people who brag on the internet generally have dicks the size of a chipmunk's back teeth.
I have NO idea why you're so obsessed with it.. Do you wanna touch it? Do you wanna bite it?? You DO, don't you??
I might bite it if you give me the chance.
BIG CIRCUMCISED DICK!
You must be very proud of having less feeling in your penis when you have sex with your hand.
Piss off you little bitch ass nigga. If you truly "respect" other people or at least want to help them rather than leave them to bullshit you would correct them when they are objectively wrong and try to show them the truth. Respecting beliefs essentially means that you treat the beliefs as more important than the people themselves, hating a belief is not the same as hating people and speaking out against stupid beliefs is more helpful than letting people be stupid.
The reasons Democrats say nothing about truly saving lives when it comes to back ground checks in Nightclubs, bars, etc.... is because THEY drink and they do not want to be inconvenienced by back ground checks.
Guns are specifically designed for killing things, alcohol is designed to make you have fun.
Hello Joe:
Some people want to GAS the Jews because they THINK the Jews are INFERIOR but JEWS are ACTUALLY superior so it's the ARYANS who should be GASSED and your A hater if you DISAGREE with me.
excon, Jewish Royalty, warrior prince, and possessor of large penis
Are we talking right vs. left on the full political spectrum, or right vs. left on the modern American political spectrum
The American political spectrum is a narrow little revisionist box of bullshit that has programmed you to view the left/right dynamic as left wing authoritarianism vs beautiful, sexually orgasmic freedom in the form of corporations butt fucking the poor.
it seems to me that the difference between far right (totalitarian theocrats, monarchists, etc.) and far left (communists, etc.) are merely a matter of vocabulary, not overall effect in practice.
You know what I think? I think you're a mis-educated pseudo-intellectual fucktard. Even if we pretend socialism is inherently authoritarian (which you would know is antithetical to the truth if you studied the true ideological roots of it) socialist nations are still vastly different from fascist ones. Let's compare right wing Nazism VS the social-democracy turned state-capitalist bureaucracy known as the USSR. The Nazis were traditionalist, treated their beorgiosie well, were obsessed with race and traditional gender roles, promoted superstition and weird metaphysical crap, and had the goal of global Aryan supremacy. The USSR valued rationality over religion or mysticism, did not care about race or enforcing gender roles, were not as kind to the beorgiosie, and had the goal of eventually dissolving the state and setting up a moneyless and stateless society.
Personally I think the sweet spot is in the center region of democratic republics
Great, so you think the status quo is perfect and that no society will ever progress beyond the irrational monkey stage where they rely on social constructs and authority to guide them rather than reason and democracy as us radical leftists propose. As radical egalitarians, we true socialists reject the very notion of authority and think none should be above any other.
Do you think some guy or gal in government knows how to run my life and spend my money better than I do?
That question is not relevant since you are actually for a bigger government than I am but the answer is that it's a case by case basis sort of thing. It depends upon the particular area of your life being "run" and whether the individual in question happens to be more intelligent in a given area than the politician in question.
Do you think some guy or gal in government is more likely to be moral/ethical and more interested in fairness than I am?
Once again, it depends who they/you are.
The only thing they really share in practice is that they are ideological religions, and as such those fully indoctrinated into them will sacrifice the well-being of others and/or themselves in order to move closer toward them.
Can you elaborate on this? I can see what you might be saying from different angles but I need to be sure.
how do you propose to make it a wild success overnight?
I won't tell you just in case I actually buy the site at some point. A true capitalist never reveals his secrets.
was could made
wtf are they feeding you kids these days, meth?
What's the book called? I might write it down in my dark notebook of evil. (the notebook where I write down all the things I'm going to do.)
I get my religious beliefs from Israel, my political from cennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnntrists
That's a typical American.
These childish fools down vote simply to show what idiots they are.
You ban everyone simply to show what an idiot you are.
They wouldn't know what debating is if it bit them.
Leftists engage in debate much more often than you, who simply bans everyone who disagrees with you unless they only mildly disagree with you.
I love how I live in their minds, as they must search out every post I write.
No one cares what you write, and almost no one actually reads your insane rants. I did a few times, and all I got from it is that you are nuts.
Leftist's are like dictators who must censor any speech that does not agree with them.
You are the one censoring the left by banning them though. You are such a retarded hypocritical dick head for complaining about censorship while you ban literally everyone.
They are Socialist's
You don't know what a socialist is because if one tried to talk to you you would scream at them and ban their free speech like a fascist, totalitarian nut case.
religious freedoms
That's an oxymoron since if you believe in religion you are a mentally programmed fool who has been indoctrinated with superstitious nonsense. Even still though, as a far left socialist I am not in favour of banning religion so I don't know what you're talking about.
gun freedoms
Guns are a big responsibility and not everyone can handle using them. It should be obvious that guns aren't something that should be freely distributed or provided to someone just because they have enough money to pay for one.
freedoms of tax payers not paying for abortions
What if I don't want to pay for the military to shoot people overseas or pay to bail out rich bankers?
The Left is all about big Government control
The left is about egalitarianism, the right is about elitism. This is a fact, look up where the left/right spectrum comes from before saying this nonsense again.
I'm multicultural.
Then why are your political and theological attitudes so strongly aligned with those of the culture you grew up in? You are 100% American and the fact that you like belly dancing and chinese food doesn't change that. The only thing that will change it is if you learn how to start thinking outside the box of American politics and Judeo-Christian theology.
Don't be cute.
I can't help it with these buns.
you were trying to gather information about me.
know about it because you sent me a link in a PM, along with links to other, unrelated stuff I wrote even longer ago
A lot of that information was told to me by Mingiwuwu or Bronto, don't confuse me telling you what they told me with me stalking you all over the internet. I have looked things up in an attempt to find out more about you and find things you posted on other sites, but nowhere near as much as Mingiwuwu or Bronto who have PMed me things like what they thought was your IP and pictures they thought were you. Bronto used to tell me things thinking I was an anti-Nom ally that could help him troll you and Mingiwuwu was stalking you because he was essentially imagining himself as some kind of heroic detective and he constantly kept me updated in PM and tried to convince me you are evil.
Mingiwuwu left the site completely after you did the same to him and discovered a Youtube video which you linked publicly
I posted his picture and made fun of it (he doesn't have youtube videos anymore, although I know that he used to) out of spite because of his legal threats and because he was doing exactly what you think I was doing.
My published work if I recall correctly, which obviously has my name on it.
It's your choice if you want to reveal it or not, but just know that I am the one who has already put trust in you and invited you into the circle. Revealing your name is small beans compared to that.
You didn't mention a word about it to me
Then why are we even talking about it? The article about 9/11 was posted here on CD and I told you what I was doing right after I used it in a google search to try and find other things you wrote. That is the only reason you even know about it. Like I said back then I copied and pasted the whole article into a search engine hoping a copy of it would show up alongside other things you wrote. All I found was the article I linked you to which was the same as the one you put on CD, and an argument you had on some wiki sub-forum under the name Quantumhead.
Bullcrap. You're absolutely full of it.
You don't remember me asking you to show me some of your work 100 times?
why even bother to hide what you were doing?
I didn't hide what I was doing.
Why not just ask me to link you?
I literally did multiple times.
You are charged with four counts of being salty. How do you plead?
I plead that I am the judge in this courtroom and you need to sit down and shut your crotch nibbling face-hole.
You began turning the internet upside down to try to find out my real life identity
I was looking for things that you wrote, not specifically trying to find out your identity.
Excellent, Will you please remit $400 / month to my PO box to keep the site running...
Thank you!
I am at a point in my life where I need to get paid rather than do the paying, otherwise I might consider buying the entire site from you and turning it into a massive overnight success with thousands of visitors daily.
