And you are cold and empty inside, which is why you try to make other people feel that way too.
Literally everything you've said to me over the past few days is pure projection, it's really fascinating. I disagree with you about one thing and all of the sudden you think I'm a total idiot even though you know deep down inside that I at least have a point even if you believe your own bullshit. I knew that you have some problems in certain areas when it comes to logic and that you never really considered me your friend but this is just too much. In terms of both stupidity and being a dick you are truly crossing the fucking line.
I will give you one final chance to read and respond with intellectual honesty before I ignore everything you ever write to me for the rest of eternity just as you have ignored me.
Religion is a social-cultural system of designated behaviors and practices, morals, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, or spiritual elements.- Wikipedia
Science (from the Latin word scientia, meaning "knowledge")[1] is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[2][3][4]- Wikipedia
You have (with great dishonesty) appealed to semantics to cling to your original argument, and while your attempts to justify calling science a religion make sense semantically (to an extent) they do not make sense in the reality that exists beyond mere words. Not all ideology is religious in nature and nothing could be farther from religion than science. This is not to say that science is an ideology, because it's not that either. Firstly, religion deals specifically with the spiritual/metaphysical whereas science deals specifically with the material world. Second, science is by definition a process of figuring out what the truth is rather than a claim as to what the truth is. The closest science comes to being an ideology is the fact that there are certain ideological perspectives that lead to science being conceived, but as I already explained you do not have to believe in those perspectives to USE the METHODOLOGY of science because science is a system to be used rather than a statement to be believed. Everything you have said about me is projection, you cannot admit you are wrong so you play semantical games to put a systematic process designed to uncover truths about physical reality in the same category as a mindless faith in supernatural garbage.
Jesus loves you
You don't even know if Jesus exists or not, you just want to believe in him because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.
Jews killed off the old Russian royalty in the Bolshevik communist revolution.
How is that a bad thing? Off with their heads, I say. The world has no place for Monarchs who are handed wealth and power through inheritance and use it to oppress and exploit.
Many doctors are Jewish, and they are not hurting anyone.
lol, many doctors are hurting people whether they're Jewish or not. They want to sell you drugs and surgery to pay off their yachts.
but because I am a Christiannnnnnnnnnnnnn (follower of Christ), who is Jewish, I am not allowed to speak ill of Jews or Israel.
Jesus himself spoke ill of Jews, he thought that many of them were corrupt and not true believers. Disliking individual Jews is not the same as hating Jews in general.
Not only are you "allowed" in christianity to "speak ill" of Israel if it becomes corrupt, but whether or not christianity allows you to do something shouldn't even factor into it because christianity is just an irrational belief system with no basis in reality.
I as a centrist, do nnnnnnnnnnnnnot agree with any far left or far right government, in Israel, US, or any other country,
Israel is far right. You are also not a moderate or a centrist because you say purely right wing things such as "leftists are professional victims" and "Hitler was a socialist". Only right wingers say those things.
People on the earth can never find out how the creature began and life was from.
Evolution isn't about explaining where life in general came from, it's about explaining how new species are created. We may never know for sure how life began on earth with 100�rtainty but that's different from figuring out the mechanism through which speciation occurs.
The fable of evolution can never prove them.
Evolution is not a fable, it's a strongly supported theory. The genetics and anatomy of all creatures are related to other creatures that exist in both past and present in ways that are too significant to be coincidental.
why can't someone create some creatures? (even can't basic organism!)
Because we don't know and can only speculate what processes lead to life being created from non-living matter. There is direct evidence for the theory of evolution though.
Evolution is fake perfectly. It is not science and a law. It is just a hypothesis. (even it is not a theory.) I am an atheist, but I can never believe the bad "story".
How do you think life got the way it is?
So what they are saying is that God should treat everyone the same and make it heaven on earth regardless our selfish irresponsible choices in life.
You are completely ignoring the fact that there are 5 year olds with cancer, and ones who are born into poverty or blown up by invading armies before they have a chance to make any choices. Your argument is automatically stupid because the mentally ill have no choice in being mentally ill either and there are clearly many people suffering who can't be said to deserve it. You are quite obviously incapable of even the most basic semblance of rational thought.
The Bible speaks many times to the sins of mankind
Yes, now that you mention it the bible calls all humans sinners. I suppose your basis for the argument above is that all humans are trash who deserve to suffer inherently unless they grovel at the feet of the being who deliberately designed them to be so flawed that they supposedly deserve to be tortured in hell by default until they are "saved".
CHOOSES CHOOSES CHOOSES CHOOSES
Shut up you retarded parrot. No one makes choices before they are born that would warrant them getting cancer while they are babies or being born in abject poverty. You are a worthless, regressive sack of shit who doesn't even deserve to exist for being so fucking stupid.
Liberalism, Progressivism is all built on a no fault anything goes ideology
Conservatives ignore the root cause of people's choices because they are stuck in primitive mindsets about human behavior and full of outdated notions such as free will and sin. Nothing in neuroscience directly supports the notion that humans have free will and there is much more of a basis for the idea that we are largely the psychological product of our experiences and genes. In your world, people will always just randomly choose to do bad things and will need to be punished for it. In my progressive world, we look at the reason WHY people do things and try to mitigate their psychological issues rather than merely lock them in a cage.
When a child dies, we wonder why God lets this happen. In God's eyes he is saving that child from 70 years of hardships and rewarding them with Heaven this very moment! All children go to Heaven.
It's that kind of "logic" that leads people to kill kids.
I can't bear your idiocy
I need a bare titty to squeeze
Outlaw, you're a shitty disease
you deserve a bullet to the knee
Democrats were born into mental illness by the parents that hatched them.
Democrats, retched rats, they want to take our MAGA hats
The left is stacked against the facts, America needs less of that
a gun cannot pull it's own trigger you incessant sacks
of poorly digested crap left entrapped in the small intestine tract
yes I'm back on an alt, you're gettin' scratched with the salt
on the claws of the cat that assaulted you,
plus there's massive revolting package of faults
I unpack from the back of your skull and unmask your subconscious, revealing that you lack by default
the capacity for intelligent thought, never mind a comeback or insult
that can match what I've got
you'd rather get stabbed in the crotch
than listen to Outlaw rap when it's launched
directly at you as a response
when you act like a nonce
Now that you have turned on me and won't even read or address anything I say I don't see a point to coming here anymore. Have fun with what little remains here.
No, you're a twit.
I see, from this all I take is that you are the one who is a twit and that we are officially enemies again. I will always be the winner at the end of the day because I have learned things here and everyone else merely pontificates while refusing to accept anything they hear from those who disagree with them. I believe there's a saying about a smart person learning more from a fool than a fool will ever learn from a smart person.
RBE,
There is very good grounds for my "belief" in RBE, which in reality is not a belief but something I see as 99% of the way to being factual but I could be wrong. Really what it is is that I know that at a certain point a civilization will start to resemble technocracy once it becomes advanced enough. The reason why I know this is because type 0 humans are retarded superstitious apes and that our societies run by social constructs, opinions, and individuals seeking to enrich themselves with social construct points are illogical and incompatible with reason and truly advanced civilization. It could very well be that this technocracy resembles fascism more than socialism or some other system beyond human imagining but I think it stands to reason that it will ultimately end up as one extreme or the other (fascism or socialism) depending on what happens in the decades leading up to the transition between technologically advanced monkey stage and type 1 civilization.
socialism
If socialism is not possible than caring about politics is ultimately pointless because bullshit will always win at the end of the day. Just as with RBE though there is strong evidence indicating that it is possible and that humans are currently just too stupid for it.
eating raw meat
I don't "believe" in eating raw meat. I just do it. It is a fact that certain nutrients are destroyed when you cook them, that not all raw meat is inherently dangerous, and that carcinogens are created when you cook meat making it objectively better to eat certain animal products raw.
the teachings of Jacques Fresco
His teachings are mostly observations, he is not a person with many opinions.
the internet
The internet exists just as much as anything else in this reality.
underground rap culture
How is that a belief? I like listening to rap and find that underground rap tends to be more intelligent and lyrically advanced. Don't try to say that it's subjective either because K-Rino is better than Lil' Pump in the same way that Mozart is better than a 4 year old banging on pots and pans.
on the thin line between genius and schizophrenia
I should probably just accept that I am a genius, because other than true geniuses everyone I consider as just as if not more intelligent than me turns out to have many points of retardation and douche baggery in comparison to myself.
When you grow up poor you are more likely to stay poor not only because you lack the privileges and access to business education that rich kids are handed through no merit of their own but also because you are forced into a cycle of debt and wage slavery just to keep a roof over your head. Intelligence plays less of a roll than those factors since even an idiot can understand the nature of business if they are well-studied and have the opportunity to even start a business in the first place. The poor are also more likely to be malnourished or have a negative experience of life both of which can negatively impact IQ, which in and of itself proves capitalism's lack of meritocracy as it actively forces people to be an inferior version of themselves then blames them for their own failures while handing more and more to the successful merit-free the more they climb the class ladder by exploiting the blood sweat, and ingenuity of the working class.
Why do you like to make up stories and pretend to cite actual news?
Just let me know what group you belong to and I'll move it up on the list ;)
I belong to the group that is smart enough to know you are a lighthearted troll and that nothing you say is truly offensive because it is a joke.
Bullshit. All leftist do is act like professional victims.
You certainly have a nuanced and original perspective there. Where did you learn that one, Steven Crowder? A lot smarter people than him would disagree with him on a great many things. You should hear them out before you start basing your ideology on right wing talk shows.
Your problem is that, because you believe something, you automatically assume it to be objectively true. Which, basically, is the same problem everybody who isn't a twit has.
So now FM "isn't a twit" after you just spent the last two days calling him an idiot? I appreciate your assertion, but I actually do my best not to believe in anything. This is key to being as objective as humanly possible. You don't understand at all how I think, I literally don't believe in anything at the end of the day. It is extremely stressful to think like I do and it makes me both insane and more sane than the average human. It is difficult to explain, I am on the thin line between genius and schizophrenia. You have no idea how wrong your statement is because the root of it all is how I constantly question and second guess everything.
Science uses various qualitative and quantitative methodologies because it is an ideology
I understand that there is an underlying philosophy behind science. You don't have to believe in that philosophy to use scientific methodology. Like you said before science is not the pinnacle of evolution and I see it as something to be used and recognized for the validity it has rather than something to blindly adhere to. It is unscientific to "believe" in things both philosophically and in practice and it is stupid to think science alone can unveil all the answers. Science itself encourages you not to believe in it whereas religion demands blind adherence.
You are running around in circles because you're a petulant child who has been having temper tantrums ever since I beat you at chess.
You are truly living inside your own head when you say such bullshit. Ever since you falsely accused me of cheating you have led our relationship into a downward spiral by your very own wild faith based irrational assumptions of unscientific stupidity.
So is Christianity, moron.
Christianity is not a methodology for figuring things out, it is a series of faith based conclusions about reality. Science requires no faith because it isn't a belief, it is a process of trying to explain things and testing those explanations.
They are not mutually exclusive, moron. They are the exact same thing.
No, religion and methodology are not the same thing. A belief in a conclusion and a process which seeks to reach a conclusion are not the same thing. You're a pseudo-intellectual dick faced cunt.
Science is a form of ideology.
Science is a tool for figuring things out, not a belief system. You in no way need to adhere to any values or beliefs about nature to use scientific methodology.
It is as if you think science represents the absolute pinnacle of human evolution
Nothing I said suggests that.
You sound like you're 12 years old.
Fuck you. You said something bizarrely stupid out of the blue then started calling me an idiot when I challenged it. You cannot handle having your religious beliefs challenged it would seem.
Science: the religion that must not be questioned
That article supports my position more than yours. It is essentially about the dangers of mixing belief with science, not about how science requires belief. Religion typically has no real basis, an ideology may or may not have one, but science is all about the basis. If you think a system of seeking evidence is the same as a mindless faith based belief system you are once again retarded. Not all ideology is religious and science does not require belief, either accept this or prove me wrong.
All you want to do is argue and insult, even when you are wrong.
Address my arguments or shut up cunt. You are avoiding the fucking debate I'm trying to have with you because you are full of shit. You said that ideology is the same as religion and you said that science is an ideology. You are refusing to defend your position that science is a religion because you know it's fucking stupid and not at all true. Literally everything you just said is bullshit and you are the one running away from my extensive ass rape rather than meticulously engaging in the fucking debate like a man.
You must be a leftist
The left is superior because the further left you are the more you want to see all of humanity in it's best form rather than a wealthy elite running things according to what is best for themselves.
