CreateDebate


Shivscape's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Shivscape's arguments, looking across every debate.
3 points

There is no hard fact to suggest jesus ever existed, and the miracles are definitely not true,

The bible cannot be used as a source as it has no backing whatsoever.

0 points

All humans have free will, while its definition may be very ambiguous, ultimately we must make choices ourselves, either I press the H key or the K key, i have ultimate control over the matter.

Therefore, using logic, we DO have free will

2 points

religion gave us Al qaeda, the holocaust, Bosnia troubles.

Put aside our differences and unite under atheism

1 point

simply untrue. evolution doesn't need to be proved, it is a theory as it has no math in it.

It has the most evidence for it and therefore should be taught in schools

1 point

Creationism should be taught in a church.

Evolution should be taught in ALL schools.

2 points

It doesn't need to be proven as there is no underlying math, (in physics there is).

It is widely acknowledged as "what happened" and that is proof enough, it should be taught in schools therefore.

7 points

"God", there is no evidence for its existence, and god was invented to explain things people couldn't understand, and to keep control on ancient civilizations.

Firstly the pope says no to free condoms in Africa.

Also religion have us Al Qaeda, the holocaust and Bosnian troubles.

We need to stop dreaming and enter the real world.

0 points

Firstly it was published in 98 when he could get rich of the apparent lack of knowledge of climate change.

Secondly, Cambridge university, world renowned has managed to revoke all points made.

Also the author has no science degree.

Lastly the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty had cited the author for:

# Fabrication of data;

# Selective discarding of unwanted results (selective citation);

# Deliberately misleading use of statistical methods;

# Distorted interpretation of conclusions;

# Plagiarism;

# Deliberate misinterpretation of others' results

He has also got a tie to the oil industry and received many anonymous donations, likely from the oil industry.

0 points

This person, whoever he/she is is one of the most wonderful people ever, (s)he has exposed the FACTS and just the FACTS

0 points

There is no evidence to disprove it, watch "an inconvenient truth" by one of the most trusted politicians in the world, Al Gore, In the UK he is highly respected

0 points

Global warming is a MUST, we cannot live without the earth and there is 1 planet we know of that is capable of supporting life. We need to stop using fossil fuels and begin to explore alternative methods such as bio-fuel and wind farms.

We have got NO choice in the matter, act now or we will not be able to continue life.

2 points

Cloning can give us a way to stop extinction, we can clone cows for the best milk, and plants for more medicine.

Cloned humans organs can be used for transplants.

I am for cloning however please leave both sides of the argument here, and remember to vote!!!

1 point

If the illegal immigrants were to sign up to pay taxes they would be kicked out.

We could just give them a residence and get some money from them.

4 points

There are 2 shot and simple points to be made.

Firstly, is that there is no need to run a country based on religion, this happened in Saudi Arabia and look at the crime, injustice and autocracy there, quite simply we should run a nation based on what the majority deem to be acceptable, in the case of my country, the UK, gay marriage is acceptable, murder and rape are not.

Secondly, people do NOT choose to be gay, scientific evidence shows that people are born GAY, would you not allow a person with dyslexia or downs syndrome to marry? They are born different to us.

To sum up, anyone who feels that it is wrong is being over religious and fundamentalist, we cannot let a 2000 year old book with no known author govern the freedoms we have. A simple referendum will fix things.

2 points

An example of a post by someone who does not understand science.

THE FOETUS (UK SPELLING) IS NOT ALIVE, it cannot be asked on its rights and has no nervous system, there is a greater need in the social aspects and it is inane to suggest that there is murder in something which saves the money, time, and essentially life of the mother.

The mother keeps the rights, not the child.

1 point

I live in the United Kingdom and a 13 year old boy became a father, if he the pregnancy was aborted (his girlfriends) then he would have been spared the shame, worry, and financial difficulty.

Abortion should be legal regardless, I stand for that as does our PM

Supporting Evidence: Here is the proof (www.thesun.co.uk)


Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]