CreateDebate


SlapShot's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of SlapShot's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Great background checking?

WTF?

It's all wrong. LOL.

I was not even born in the 70s. Nor was I in Denmark.

Artrag gets an awful lot of shit wrong. Daily. Most of it stemming from his wrongful suspicions and accusation of other members and their true IDs.

See..liars think ALL of us lie.

LOL

SS

1 point

and when are ya gonna tell us where your country IS since I busted you on not being in North Korea?

LOL

SS

SlapShot(2608) Clarified
1 point

You're making me too old, amigo!

I wasn't even born until 1980.

And I was not ever in Denmark as a minor.

SS

.............................................

2 points

I hate to have to admit it, but burning the American flag in a sort of public demonstration or protest, so long as said demo is done peaceably and orderly, infringing on no laws or safety, IS a tenet of our Freedom of Speech. That is, our 1st Amendment Rights.

Having said that, I also admit that in my past on the two occasions I actually witnessed somebody doing this, I felt like kicking the living shit out of them. And it took every fiber of my being to restrain myself from doing so.

The first time I saw somebody burn the flag was when I was in college. Undergrad school at the U of M. Playing hockey. We were in DC in the off-season (Springtime) for a hockey Instructional Camp conducted by some coaches on the US National Team.

Me and three teammates were seeing the sights of DC, after practice, and were near the reflecting pond that's adjacent to the Washington Monument. A group of a dozen or so demonstrators burned a flag in protest of our "non-involvement" in knocking out some African warlords who were allegedly denying the peoples over there their allotted UN food/material aids.

So, yeah, all the protesters were black. African blacks.

We approached these guys and my teammate immediately grabbed the nigger holding the flag by the neck and threw him into a concrete statue. LOL Then he began to stomp out the fire on the flag. I was actually going to join in on the other fuckwads, but they were backing off. And then I saw some DC cops heading over our way so I called my guys off and we jogged out of there.

So, yeah, even though the majority of the assholes who burn American flags in public deserve to have their heads put through a wall, to pass legislation denying this act is to begin upon a slippery slope. After all: first the Government denies burning the flag, and then what might be next? Banning ANY sort of public dissent? See, this is not a good path to embark upon.

SlapShot(2608) Clarified
1 point

The pasted quote was indeed from our Declaration of Independence.

And no, technically, that document is not one of Laws that are necessarily legislated and enforced in America today.

But the debate topic was regarding whether or not any sort of universal declaration of human rights has ever been written and accepted by all.

Thus, the first thing that came to my mind, as well as the best example of this that I could think of was the DOI.

Hope this helps.

Thanks!

SS

1 point

Those cartoons were mundane and juvenile and their type can be found all over the USA. In both print and on the internet.

And so they don't offend me at all.

What does offend me is when literal libtard twats like you who don't even fucking live here tell me my country does not have freedom of speech. This is so wrong as to be laughable. A quick Google search will show you all the irreverent and even obscene uncensored material in this country that you want. What the fuck do you think the Internet is? If we didn't have freedom of speech we would have no internet. Like North Korea.

We fucking invented it. And as a veteran I take further issue with you denying we have it when many veterans have died defending it. And also died bailing your frog rifle dropping asses out of the fire more than once.

So...a little respect would be nice.

Hey, here's an ad I saw the other day in a gun magazine.......

For sale, French WWII rifle. Excellent condition. Never fired. Dropped once.

LOL

SS

Where can you find 60,100,000 French jokes?

In France.

How do you kill a Frenchman?

Slam the toilet lid on his head while he's getting a drink.

1 point

Hmmm....I forget, so please remind me:

What Party was in Office in the 1960's when LBJ instituted his "Great Society" Legislation that began the end of segregation? Thus, paving the road to ensure that Blacks were not to be oppressed or judged solely upon the color of their skin?

Which Party has been in Office for the past eight years, during which time our society has a whole has made bigger and more drastic strides than ever before in implementing Political Correctness and tolerance and the Rights of minorities as well as those of aberrant gender and sexual preferences?

What Party was JFK with?

What Party was Bush the Younger with, when he got over 6000 young Americans killed in an ill-waged misbegotten war? And when he said judged all those not in favor of this war as "being against us if you're not with us?"

Which Party was FDR with? And which Party implemented the New Deal, that got us out of a Depression? And though non-judgmental legislation, allowed many discriminated against Americans to get back to work?

My impression of you reading this post.........

"Ouch."

LOL

SS

1 point

Our U.S. Constitution tells you all you need to know on this issue.........

US Declaration

We hold these truths to be self-evident:

That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

You're Welcome!

LOL

SS

0 points

How do you know that there were any vacancies, if any, in the 144,000 class if Jesus offered this to first century Christians? How can the organization know the exact number of vacancies today without any records from the first century?

SS

1 point

Hmm...my service on this site is lickety-split fast.

Must be your computer.

SS

1 point

Uhh..it's a bit more than a rumor.

It's substantiated fact.

From an online article, with a personal testimony from a Danish teen.........

The recent New York Times article “Sex in a Teenager’s Room?” has generated a lot of conversation, including interesting articles in Slate and the Huffington Post. But for me, the most spirited debate has been taking place in private Facebook groups consisting of Danish women living in America. I’m not Danish, but I had the good fortune to come of age sexually while living in Denmark as a teenager. I wish everyone could be so lucky.

Back in the 1970s, long before it was popular to take a “gap year” between high school and college, I did so by embarking on a high school exchange student experience after I graduated, at the age of 17. The American Field Service program randomly sent me to Denmark.

In Denmark, it is common for teenage couples to spend the night together in each other’s homes. (As in the Netherlands, as detailed in a book by Amy Schalet, “Not Under My Roof: Parents, Teens and the Culture of Sex”). This was certainly not how I’d grown up. Though my parents were self-styled liberals, I lost my virginity in a typically American way: in the back seat of my high school crush’s car, parked in the high school parking lot during a school dance. I remember asking my parents, when I was about 10, where babies came from, and my parents fumbled through a faux-jokey response.

SS

0 points

Questions that Jehovah's Witnesses do not like to be asked.

If the organization did not actually prophesy the end in 1925 and 1975, then how come so many Witnesses left the faith immediately afterwards? ("They lost roughly three-quarters of the movement between 1925 and 1928, then suffered huge losses after 1975, when the end didn't come as they had implied over and over again," said Jim Penton, an ex-Witness who writes entries on Jehovah's Witnesses for the Encyclopedia Americana.)

If the Watchtower organization rejects others calling them "inspired" yet the Watchtower organization does call themselves "God's Spirit-directed Prophet" what is the difference? Is there such a thing as an "uninspired prophet"? See Organization claims inspiration

Has the Society ever taught anything scripturally incorrect? See Prophecy Blunders of the Organization

Might the Society be teaching anything scripturally incorrect now?

Since the Organization has received "new light" regarding the 1914 generation, and completely changed their view on this, does this mean that all the former Jehovah's witnesses who were disfellowshipped years ago for the same view the organization is now teaching will automatically be accepted into fellowship again? Were these Ex-Jw's in fact disfellowshipped for truth and knew things that the governing body did not? See Jw's were disfellowshipped for rejecting generation doctrine

Can Jehovah's Witnesses hold and discuss openly with other Jehovah's Witnesses opinions that differ from orthodox Watch Tower doctrine?

Can individuals read & understand the Bible alone, or do they need an organization and it's publications to do so? Click here find the answer!

How do you prove from the Bible that 1935 was the year for the selection to heaven stopped due to being filled? What is the difference between a Catholic appealing to "what the organization tells him" about December 25 being the date of Jesus' birthday and a Jw' appealing to "what the organization tells him" about the date 1935? Is it not hypocritical when you chide the "poor deluded Catholic" that his faith cannot find a Bible passage to support it, when the same goes for you and 1935?

How do you know that there were any vacancies, if any, in the 144,000 class if Jesus offered this to first century Christians? How can the organization know the exact number of vacancies today without any records from the first century?

Why are you called, "Jehovah's Witnesses" and not "Christians"? Since Jehovah's Witnesses appeal to Isa 43:12; 44:8 for scriptural support that they should be called, "Jehovah's Witnesses" then what was the "new name" prophesied in Isa 62:2? Can't be "Jehovah's Witnesses", for God already used it 20 chapters earlier. Could the new name be "Christian" after our savior "Christ"?

Why would the name God gave to His people not be "Christians" since Acts 11:26 says, "The disciples were first called Christians"

0 points

Why do JW's feel as though they know more about God and his intent and desires than anybody else? What makes them think they have an inside track in Theodicy? Do you even know what that word means without looking it up?

Where does there arrogance and smugness come from? If not from downright egomaniacal delusion? Especially when even Jesus himself said that nobody knows details of God? Such as the hour and time he will come? Why do JW's brazenly break so many of jesus' teachings? Why do they deny the gospels?

Like denying the cross, and calling it a pike?

Also....exactly how fucking many psychotropic meds are you on?

SS

SlapShot(2608) Clarified
1 point

Yeah, right. Like, I hear in those liberal countries like yours and Sweden and Norway and Iceland and France that a girl who still has her cherry at age 15 is often teased by her peers for being an old maid.

SS

1 point

They do better at having those experimental girl- on- girl, touchy feely romps under the sheets after a few too many many wine coolers. But that's about the only thing they get out of attending an all girl school.

And hell, they can do the bi-curious itch scratch at a coed college just fine anyway. Most women do have their first g on g there. But those fancy Eastern girl colleges like Smith and Vassar and Bryn Mawr are so rampant with dyking that some straight and non bi-curious coeds hesitate to go there, afraid they might one night get slipped a roofie and then find themselves in a game of Ant Hill with a pack of naked bull dykes.

SS

1 point

Those cartoons were mundane and juvenile and their type can be found all over the USA. In both print and on the internet.

And so they don't offend me at all.

What does offend me is when literal libtard twats like you who don't even fucking live here tell me my country does not have freedom of speech. This is so wrong as to be laughable. A quick Google search will show you all the irreverent and even obscene uncensored material in this country that you want. What the fuck do you think the Internet is? If we didn't have freedom of speech we would have no internet. Like North Korea.

We fucking invented it. And as a veteran I take further issue with you denying we have it when many veterans have died defending it. And also died bailing your frog rifle dropping asses out of the fire more than once.

So...a little respect would be nice.

Hey, here's an ad I saw the other day in a gun magazine.......

For sale, French WWII rifle. Excellent condition. Never fired. Dropped once.

LOL

SS

Where can you find 60,100,000 French jokes?

In France.

How do you kill a Frenchman?

Slam the toilet lid on his head while he's getting a drink.

1 point

If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.” (Leviticus 20:13 NAB)

SS

1 point

If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.” (Leviticus 20:13 NAB)

SS

1 point

But he is not in North Korea. It is impossible.

No citizenry there has access to the Internet o which CreateDebate resides. The available servers in North Korea are all internal, and heavily sensored. It's an Intra net. Called the Kwangymon. My lab instructor helped design it, and just returned from Korea a couple weeks ago. Told me all about it.

So why pay any attention to a liar? He is useless.

SS

1 point

Of course a faggot like you would say that.

When are you gonna admit I busted you and you don't live in North Korea?

Why do you lie so much?

1 point

But how can you as a raving and zealous fundamentalist Christian, who claims their biblecis the inerrant word of God, not support its stance on homosexuality?

That stance being, of course, that all of them are unforgivable sinners who deserve to burn in hell? If you claim the gays are entitled to be themselves you are contradicting your holy book mandate. Also you are going being insubordinate to your God's orders.

Making you a sinner. A heretic.

You cannot have it both ways. You cannot preach your silly Bible and say that everything in it is irrefutable, and then say that some of its laws should not be followed.

To do this casts questions on all of its rules and laws.

You know, like us rational atheists do!

LOL

SS

1 point

When are you gonna admit I busted you as a liar?

You're not in North Korea like you said.

So why should we believe anything you say?

It's all total pure unadulterated bullshit.

Pure fiction.

We all know it.

You have no friends here, gook boy.

Now....bugger off.

LOL

SS

2 points

Well, yeah... kNHaven is in a class by herself. Easily the most "spun" CD member. Too far gone to debate with. Would not last one day on any other debate or open forum site, before getting banned for either trolling or thread hijacking.

I don't really consider her a debater. Just the resident psycho. But Sitar tries to mix it up and talk politics and social issues in which she clearly has zero experience. I am thinking she does not live in the real world. She cannot possibly be employed or self supporting, could she?

-1 points

Typical post from the resident confused wannabe feminist twit.

You criticize an entire network just because their political zeitgeist differs from yours. I could make a debate calling MSNBC noise too. But I know that would be unfair and a straw man argument. So I don't. That's what happens when you are in science. You learn the empirical method and the objectivity of unbiased observation.

You need to try it some time. But first you need a class in political science 101. When you get hold enough.

SS


1 of 106 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]