CreateDebate


Smarlen's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Smarlen's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

I think NO. I can give example, women in Islamic countries have to follow to Islam laws according to Government Law.

Please participate on debate:

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Do AfghanwomenhavehumiliatingpositionIsitnormalthatwifemustobeyherhusband_3#arg0

1 point

Religion is belief, and Atheism is belief, because atheism has many points of view Have we life after death or not. According to one wide-spread opinion of Atheism, God does not exist and after death people come to Darkness and emptiness. It means that Atheism is one type of religion. Religion is not belief only to God. Satanism is also religion, Sectarianism is also religion.

1 point

I think, it is too strong pressure and wife has to do too much things. Also, it looks like selling your body for money(wife must to obey to her husband and the husband has to take care of her).

Smarlen(48) Clarified
1 point

Why is it normal? Explain your mind fully and describe it.

1 point

You are wrong. Belief in the God becomes more weaken. It gets increased, only if the Satan will do bad things)). Power of God depends on power of Satan.

3 points

Sale of drugs is the same as murder. When Dealers sell drugs - they make other people dependent. After that, dealers slowly kill them.

3 points

It is not the solution. Legalizing drugs give us control list of drugs. But nobody will can forbid any type. For example, if the government legalized drugs, there will be people, who want to get more money. They will sell more heavy drugs, such as LSD, heroine and others

3 points

I think "Yes", because people understand only strict, cruel methods, they understand only power. We should punish dealers as punished pedophiles - straight and cruelly. And it helped to decrease number of pedophiles. Unfortunately, this law is legal in very few countries( And about dealers: We should crush them and allow electric chair.

1 point

Why you discuss the Old Testament. It does not links with Christian.

Smarlen(48) Clarified
1 point

Yes, it is Latin word. It was used to praise Julius Cesar in Ancient Rome

1 point

I cannot your side that you keep. Your mind is that "Satan is God" or "Satan is not exist and God is not exist" or even "Only Satan is exist and God is fake"?

1 point

Yes! It is! God crushed Sodom and Gomorrah! He made massive flood, because people were sinners

2 points

I cannot understand you. You called Prodegee as Jackass, but you repeated his words. He said that Satan canot be exist without God and you said "there is not either". It is the same, and your words must support "Yes" opinion

1 point

Yes, you are right. But my opinion, maybe, some differ from your words. I think that Satan is angry God. God is calm Satan.

1 point

You do not want hear bad things about religion. You do not want to listen anyone. We just tried to show you that religious people are not guaranteed good people.

1 point

Islam laws(ORIGINAL LAWS) are very similar to Nazism, are very cruel. For example, to pour 60 pails on, woman who betrayed her husband. Or cut hand, if people steal. Yes, it is practiced in China, but it is radical methods. I want to say that Islamic laws are more and more cruel.

1 point

Nobody forbid freedom of speech. Why do you go to another topic? Abolish religion for time does not mean destroying all rights of people. You just blame me, without understanding what I say.

1 point

I am not fascist, I am nor against religion. I am against terrorism. If we abolish religion (for time), we will can destroy terrorists. After that, we will allow it. It is just way to fight against terrorists

2 points

It is right, but no one person can say that"I believe and all people must believe"

0 points

Your "fighters for freedom" were first to attack the government, they just want to get more power over countries. This situation about defense of rights can be looked from different sides: maybe the government is victim and religion want destroy rights of real government.

1 point

Maybe we speak about different extremists? You say about extremists in general, I say about RELIGIOUS extremists.

2 points

why you wrote the same in both sides? what about your words: belief should not link with politics, intervene in political affairs!

1 point

No, you do not know about consequences of hard drugs. Having hard drugs like heroine, is forbidden and it gets punished without judging. Marijuana is "easy" drug and it does not cause fatal result, people just need to think about doses. If people smoke too much, it leads to death. If people drunk much, it leads to delirium tremens.

1 point

Do you know any ways of using Marijuanna in good sides? If you know, it means that it should be legalized. You signed my words by your disputing.

1 point

Also, I can agree that it does not causes dependence as hard drugs(heroine, cocaine, LSD). It seemed me non-harmful as cigarettes.

1 point

What can you say about smoking marijuana because of glaucoma? Maybe it should be legalize, because of helpful features

2 points

The US blamed Islam in terrorism, but main terrorism in Asia and Africa. How Islamists can defend from US, if they attack Asian and African countries? About Christians: they form their sects, create secret religious organizations and with their actions, they get more recruits than Islamists. Christian sects are very weakly connected with Christianism, but they rely on it. These sects are strongly linked with criminal and terrorism. In Russian, there are very many christian sects and they create conflicts between religious people. Because of that, now, Russian Government started to arrest religious offender, but it does not bring help.

3 points

If religion fanatics intervene in govern affairs, they cannot be seemed victims. It means attack. This action means that, religion want to control the government.

3 points

You said that Islam as main religion in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan should control people. You words are heard as fanatical idea. Religion started to intervene in govern affairs, not government in religion affairs. The government just defends from religion. Religious fanatics were first to "defend rights" and they "just were need" to attack civilians. What can you say about it?

2 points

Powerful people will find way to affect on ordinary people. This method will not help.

1 point

It is isolated case. He can have important links with agents of ministry. In real life, it cannot be with other people. Even, if people create online democracy system, this system will be correctional, not honest. Everything will depend on agencies of web-site.

4 points

We should abolish religion as tool of extremists to getting power. If we do it, we will can prevent it. Nowadays Islamists tried to come to Parliament of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. In Uzbekistan, there is nervous situation yet. Countries tried to fix situation and to limit religious organizations, but it did not make sense. Because of that, the governments should to abolish religion. If we abolish religion:

1) People will stop conflict because of religion.

2) Extremists will lose their main tool of getting recruits.

3) The government will get opportunity to destroy illegal religious sects.

1 point

I just express my opinion: It does not make sense. It has no help. Online voting can be the same. People will do as herd, which follows after thought of one man. Or, if you say that it can be anonymously, people will vote anonymously for themselves.

2 points

How can you define true way? Why do choose one method and say that it is good? You do not give arguments. You just say that your answer is right. You just repeat and repeat that we are wrong. Your words seems me fanatical. You have no any arguments. Why you blame me that my arguments are weak, if you do not give other facts? You think that only you are right and you do not listen to any other people.

1 point

You said that I cannot dispute properly, but you give the same arguments: you repeat and repeat them. When I started to talk you about another information, you had blamed me

1 point

To abolish, because extremists do not want to follow limitation.

1 point

Crows constantly were black color, also they have such mystical appearance that it seems me envoy of Darkness. In myths and legends, crows could move from our world to underground world(Hell).

1 point

You are stupid? Extremists mean religion fanatics, not sexual maniacs. They are terrorists, which use religion to cover their actions

1 point

How can you say that God could be anything, if you have no proofs that you are right. Maybe God is only statue of Jesus? or Koran book? or Buddha medallion? or even sent human? My answer: God could not be anything, because you cannot prove it

2 points

As people said, we CANNOT know everything, we cannot say that "this line of religion is main". It can be wrong. About second: it is good, but it is not enough. We should make more. The third: borders are not problem for extremists, because main weapon is saved in their heads. Extremists will move freely from one country to another and we cannot know their faces

3 points

But there are very few non-religious terrorists. They are loners, because they are not so supported, as extremists with wide-spread religion

2 points

Extremists almost DO NOT RAPE anybody, but they can kill many people. What about new extremists: we should destroy these extremists, when new extremists appear - we will be prepared

5 points

Limit religion to make control better and decrease free place of action to extremists

4 points

It is the same. For example, in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and other middle Asian countries, Islam started to intervene in affairs of government. It can lead to become religious government type. If we limit religion and solve only some official agencies, we will notice better the extremism propagation.

4 points

If abolish religion, extremists will lose source of supporters, place where they can recruit new people. New non-religion extremists cannot appear when religion extremists act. We will destroy these extremists and when new extremists start to create something, we will be finished to it.

2 points

Yes, but religions are divided on parts and we cannot define the main part of religion. They have many different ways. We cannot say that all of them is evil, but we should limit influence of religion to politics. How it can be connected with politics? I think religions have peaceful ideas and they have not idea that power must be of religion people.

1 point

I think that we should at least abolish gay-parades,because it is clean propagation of homosexuality.

3 points

I cannot blame religion, but religion is very often used by extremists, at least in Asian and African countries

6 points

If we limit religion, it will help us to destroy terrorists and decrease their supporters' number.

4 points

Peaceful actions are very calm and quiet. People who develop peaceful ideology of religion should be more energetic, it would be good. But, there are very few such people. Extremists act very actively and get need things. Because of that religion more harms than helps.

3 points

I don't blame religion, but you cannot disagree that religion is very often used by extremists, at least in Asian and African countries.

3 points

I cannot blame, but you cannot disagree with idea that religion is the main instrument of terrorists, at least in Europe, Asia and Africa.

1 point

Homosexuality is mental disorder of people and, according to medical researches, homosexuality is illness. People can be alone, can live with family, can get marriage, BUT they cannot have sex with the same genders. Even in Bible, Sodom and Gomorrah were crashed by God power. It means that homosexuality is not right thing. It is not insult, it is just information which I learn from TV and Web.

4 points

It is not evil, but it is very often used by extremists to get power. We have no opportunity to fight against cunning extremists.

1 point

Yes, but it does not mean that we HAVE TO explain all events by religion. I want to say that religion does not deserve so absolute confidence.

6 points

We have no power to fight against cunning of extremists and we just have to forbid religion to defend from problems as civil war in Syria, Algeria, Mali

1 point

Religion covers our self-conscience showing some "facts" which are liked by people and people prefer to believe in good things. Religion influenced us many centuries and fixedly entrenched in our heads. Our ancestors lived where religion had position of life purpose and disbelief cruelly punished by government. People during very much time are used to the religion and the laws which are dictated by religion. It became the inseparable part of human life and because of that people prefer to believe in religion, because nowadays they have almost no their own will.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]