CreateDebate


Smarlen's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Smarlen's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Do you know any ways of using Marijuanna in good sides? If you know, it means that it should be legalized. You signed my words by your disputing.

1 point

Also, I can agree that it does not causes dependence as hard drugs(heroine, cocaine, LSD). It seemed me non-harmful as cigarettes.

1 point

What can you say about smoking marijuana because of glaucoma? Maybe it should be legalize, because of helpful features

2 points

The US blamed Islam in terrorism, but main terrorism in Asia and Africa. How Islamists can defend from US, if they attack Asian and African countries? About Christians: they form their sects, create secret religious organizations and with their actions, they get more recruits than Islamists. Christian sects are very weakly connected with Christianism, but they rely on it. These sects are strongly linked with criminal and terrorism. In Russian, there are very many christian sects and they create conflicts between religious people. Because of that, now, Russian Government started to arrest religious offender, but it does not bring help.

3 points

If religion fanatics intervene in govern affairs, they cannot be seemed victims. It means attack. This action means that, religion want to control the government.

3 points

You said that Islam as main religion in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan should control people. You words are heard as fanatical idea. Religion started to intervene in govern affairs, not government in religion affairs. The government just defends from religion. Religious fanatics were first to "defend rights" and they "just were need" to attack civilians. What can you say about it?

2 points

Powerful people will find way to affect on ordinary people. This method will not help.

1 point

It is isolated case. He can have important links with agents of ministry. In real life, it cannot be with other people. Even, if people create online democracy system, this system will be correctional, not honest. Everything will depend on agencies of web-site.

4 points

We should abolish religion as tool of extremists to getting power. If we do it, we will can prevent it. Nowadays Islamists tried to come to Parliament of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. In Uzbekistan, there is nervous situation yet. Countries tried to fix situation and to limit religious organizations, but it did not make sense. Because of that, the governments should to abolish religion. If we abolish religion:

1) People will stop conflict because of religion.

2) Extremists will lose their main tool of getting recruits.

3) The government will get opportunity to destroy illegal religious sects.

1 point

I just express my opinion: It does not make sense. It has no help. Online voting can be the same. People will do as herd, which follows after thought of one man. Or, if you say that it can be anonymously, people will vote anonymously for themselves.

2 points

How can you define true way? Why do choose one method and say that it is good? You do not give arguments. You just say that your answer is right. You just repeat and repeat that we are wrong. Your words seems me fanatical. You have no any arguments. Why you blame me that my arguments are weak, if you do not give other facts? You think that only you are right and you do not listen to any other people.

1 point

You said that I cannot dispute properly, but you give the same arguments: you repeat and repeat them. When I started to talk you about another information, you had blamed me

1 point

To abolish, because extremists do not want to follow limitation.

1 point

Crows constantly were black color, also they have such mystical appearance that it seems me envoy of Darkness. In myths and legends, crows could move from our world to underground world(Hell).

1 point

You are stupid? Extremists mean religion fanatics, not sexual maniacs. They are terrorists, which use religion to cover their actions

1 point

How can you say that God could be anything, if you have no proofs that you are right. Maybe God is only statue of Jesus? or Koran book? or Buddha medallion? or even sent human? My answer: God could not be anything, because you cannot prove it

2 points

As people said, we CANNOT know everything, we cannot say that "this line of religion is main". It can be wrong. About second: it is good, but it is not enough. We should make more. The third: borders are not problem for extremists, because main weapon is saved in their heads. Extremists will move freely from one country to another and we cannot know their faces

3 points

But there are very few non-religious terrorists. They are loners, because they are not so supported, as extremists with wide-spread religion

2 points

Extremists almost DO NOT RAPE anybody, but they can kill many people. What about new extremists: we should destroy these extremists, when new extremists appear - we will be prepared

5 points

Limit religion to make control better and decrease free place of action to extremists

4 points

It is the same. For example, in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and other middle Asian countries, Islam started to intervene in affairs of government. It can lead to become religious government type. If we limit religion and solve only some official agencies, we will notice better the extremism propagation.

4 points

If abolish religion, extremists will lose source of supporters, place where they can recruit new people. New non-religion extremists cannot appear when religion extremists act. We will destroy these extremists and when new extremists start to create something, we will be finished to it.

2 points

Yes, but religions are divided on parts and we cannot define the main part of religion. They have many different ways. We cannot say that all of them is evil, but we should limit influence of religion to politics. How it can be connected with politics? I think religions have peaceful ideas and they have not idea that power must be of religion people.

1 point

I think that we should at least abolish gay-parades,because it is clean propagation of homosexuality.


2 of 3 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]