CreateDebate


Spartacus's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Spartacus's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Isn't it the left wanting to tax us into oblivion?

The left wants to tax the people who are getting fat off my labour.

Liar.

1 point

Most "hard workers" aren't liberals...

Still trying to create a false dichotomy between left and right wing capitalists.

Liar.

1 point

Well there goes the "Conservatives are poor, uneducated hillbillies" narrative..

Liar.

2 points

liberal media

Liar. Disproved by Herman and Chomsky almost 30 years ago.

3 points

1)99%+ of Conservatives do not own a business.

Liar.

2)Libs are known for not being laborers.

Liar.

3)Many business owners are liberals...

Irrelevant. False dichotomy. Still a liar.

Socialism is "piggybacking off of others' labor" by definition.

Opposite of the truth. Liar.

3 points

Socialists don't give people their money back

Shut up liar.

They give your money you earned to someone that didn't earn it

You just described capitalism, liar. I work 40 hours a week and the profit I generate goes to someone who didn't earn it.

I am putting you on the autoban list because everything you say is a lie.

1 point

If nomenclature's puppets are racists and bigots, nomenclature is a racist and a bigot.

I don't even know who nomenclature is. The person posting as spartacus2 is not my account, and I am guessing probably belongs to you.

All you are really doing is proving the OP is true. You are liars and trolls.

1 point

And...your IP address is Nomenclature's

And... This is definitely a deliberate lie.

Banned for lying.

1 point

Says the liberal who works at MC Donald's making more than police officer

I don't know whether you are lying deliberately or if you just have me confused with somebody else. Either way, I'm not a liberal and I've never worked at McDonalds. Believe it or not, if someone is not a Conservative then that does not automatically make them a Liberal, you damn dummy.

1 point

Trump colluded with the Russians to hack Hillary's emails and to fix the US election. If that isn't treason then I really don't know what is.

Spartacus(1) Clarified
0 points

A regulated military is a military that can be kept in check by the people it is supposed to be fighting for.

Well that rules out the US army.

1 point

If you weren't a new version of an old troll I would say you are like a child wandering into the middle of a movie. I'll catch you up.

I stated that a military superpower will bring stability to a region, even if that superpower sucks.

No, you did not say this. You said this:-

I have stated my position repeatedly. That an overwhelmingly strong force brings stability to a region.

An "overwhelmingly strong force" is not the same thing as the rule of law for a cornucopia of different reasons, including the fact that law operates under the principle of democratic consent. Your word-swapping tricks are not even consistent with basic common sense, because even if we assume that force and law are indeed the exact same thing, all you are really arguing is that the United States is a dictatorship and that a dictatorship is necessary for peace. So we are back to me pointing out that this is Nazi ideology.

1 point

Probably the best argument I have read on the internet.

Not looking for the best. Just the most accurate.

You don't seem to know how laws work

You don't seem to understand the difference between force and law. First you claimed force brings stability to a region, and now you have swapped the word force for law. I am quickly beginning to see why other posters have accused you of intellectual dishonesty.

1 point

I have stated my position repeatedly. That an overwhelmingly strong force brings stability to a region.

You sound exactly like Hitler. Nothing is stable when you use force to make people do things. Try opening a history book and see if you can tell me what every single empire since the dawn of man has in common. I'll give you a hint. None of them exist any more.

1 point

I never said I was commanded to read it. You made it up.

LOL. Oh, you fucking liar. First you claimed you were commanded to ignore it:-

There's no command in the Constitution to ignore anything. There is the command in the New Testament.

When it was pointed out that it is a logical contradiction to make the Old Testament half of the Christian Bible if Christians have indeed been commanded to ignore it, you did a complete U-turn and said "We read it to understand why it was abolished". BUT IF ALL CHRISTIANS (I.E. "WE") READ IT FOR EXACTLY THE SAME REASON, IT MUST LOGICALLY FOLLOW THAT THERE HAS BEEN A COMMAND TO READ IT FOR THAT REASON, OTHERWISE RETARDS LIKE YOU WOULD NOT KNOW THE REASON YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO READ IT.

You are literally, LITERALLY more stupid than a bag of fucking potatoes. You are a lying, rat-faced hypocrite who cannot even stick to the same story for two sentences.

Fuck off.

1 point

We should show Noth Korea what we're about.

The complete destruction of reason?

-2 points
2 points

We're talking about an omnipotent, omniscient, supernatural entity here. Are you claiming God to be less than all-knowing?

You are an idiot incapable of thinking anything through before you write it. How can God be both omnipotent and omniscient? If God knows the future then he is no longer omnipotent because it means he can't change his mind about what happens in the future. If he can change his mind about what happens in the future then he no longer knows the future.

If the results of its actions aren't moral, how can it be so?

Have you considered that it is because God decides on what is moral, not some random narcissistic idiot on the internet who is too stupid to debate people without lying and/or distorting the facts?

Are you aware that you are stupid? I ask this seriously. If you are aware and are just having a little bit of fun then that's fine. But if you actually think rambling pure gibberish at people is a sign if intellect then, with respect, I think you belong in a psychiatric institution.

1 point

Dude, you just proved my point.

Interesting. Is your point that you are mentally handicapped?

You are just saying stupid shit

So even when I argue with you in your own language you aren't happy?

so you can call it sarcasm later.

Gotcha. I'm "stupid" because you don't understand sarcasm.

There is no reason to read what you write.

And yet you read all of it. Lol. You're like a dog on the end of a leash.

1 point

The first 4 words are a lie.

You are two for two tonight on failing to understand sarcasm. I bet that really helps when the girls tell you, "Sure buddy, you're not the ugliest, most stupid creature I've ever met. Let's fuck." Or nah?

1 point

Are you serious?

No, I was joking. What do you think, retard?

Bias is prejudice for or against an entity

You have very predictably left out half the dictionary definition of "bias". The specific part that reveals your intentions in making the claim of bias in the first place:-

Bias: inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, ESPECIALLY IN A WAY CONSIDERED TO BE UNFAIR.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bias

As you have more than proven, my assessment of Conservatism is fair. You have resorted to distorting the facts by your second sentence. I will not continue to give your complete lack of honesty any merit by reading or responding to it. If you want to play, "Who can tell the most whopping lies", then go play with someone else.

1 point

You couldn't even figure out you were even given quotes

I was cunningly able to deduce that you had provided no relevant quotes because I didn't say what you claim I said. I asked for a quote proving the claim you made. I didn't ask you to take out a hatchet and cut half of a sentence dripping in sarcasm in order to take the words out of context and I didn't ask you to lie about the meaning of a second quote you arbitrarily decided to paste onto the first (even though it was written in a completely different post). You did that all on your own because you are an intellectually dishonest retard whose only weapon in life is a fat mouth. You can parrot my own insults back at me all you like, but tomorrow morning when we both wake up, you are still going to be the one of us that is the "complete fucking moron".

1 point

I stopped reading after you claimed you saying that you are biased is not proof

LOL. Sure, retard. When you say something clearly dripping in sarcasm that counts as proof that you mean it sincerely. I am Hitler. Better run to the Jewish lobby with your proof, Forrest. Lol.

I hope you didn't have anything important to say after that.

Not really. I was just pointing out what a lying retard you are. Fairly self-evident stuff people are more than capable of working out on their own.

Can I have that quote now? The one where you say I agree I'm unwitty, uncivil and biased?

1 point

I gave you the quotes you stupid fuck.

You gave two different quotes and neither of them supported the claim you made. You are a pathetically dishonest little retard.

So you are delusional as well as dishonest?

Either provide the support for your false claim that you were asked for or fuck off back to the playground. Just what do you gain by pretending to provide what you were asked for? That is indicative of a serious mental illness.

That isn't what happened.

I was using an analogy you persistently stupid child. The statement you quoted said the accusations were not relevant to the topic, not that they were true. Are you under the impression that people who see this exchange are not going to be able to read? Because that is the only way you are going to win it, you crooked fucking moron.


2 of 3 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]