Ad homenim fallacy. Post on the internet
You didn't say "posts on the internet", retard. You said "ideas". You can't change what you wrote and then accuse someone else of fallacy. That's stupid.
Quoting somebody else's idea anywhere (including on the internet) without crediting the source is an infringement of copyright. It is therefore illegal.
Nice argument, but I disagree with your statement. Firstly, riots and fights would be more prominent without a government in place, since there would be no law forbidding them and no consequences to discourage them.
No. This is a false dichotomy in which you misrepresent government as the only possible alternative to lawlessness and depravity. It's the same as demanding we must adopt Sharia law because otherwise we are destined to suffer in hell (or whatever is the Islamic equivalent). In no way, shape or form, have you put forward any kind of rational argument about why the citizenry cannot run its own police force and/or criminal justice system, without the intervention of a third party.
I say no. If theres a nuclear holocaust then we deserve to become extinct and let the earth heal from our precense.
It's easy to think that way, but not everybody is a douchebag. That's the problem with our species. We are both great good and great evil. It just depends who you see, and on which day.
what is the point of living when you can't do anything because your not educated.
The irony is strong here. Most kids in middle school know the difference between "you're" and "your". One is a contraction of "you" and "are", and the other is a possessive pronoun.
I do respect the belief(s) of others, though, Christian Jew, Muslim …. whatever.
I don't. I think those people are idiots. I have no respect for their antiquated and ridiculous beliefs, any more than I would have respect for someone who believes the Earth is the centre of the universe or the Moon is made of cheese. For some reason, when it comes to religion, we are bullied into "respecting" farcical notions which under any other circumstances would be laughed at and ridiculed.
Most soldiers are our brothers, friends, neighbors, sisters, aunts, uncles ….. etc.!
All the more reason why you should make them see sense. The way it works is very simple. The government sends them off to kill a bunch of foreigners, and despite what they are doing clearly being morally dubious, you are compelled to "support them" because they are members of your family. The government knows this, and knows it can send them off to kill and be killed with complete impunity, regardless of the basis (or lack of basis) for taking action. Look at Iraq and/or Afghanistan as the perfect examples. Are any of you Americans crying for the million or so killed as a result of those completely pointless and unnecessary conflicts? Nope. Even though they were 100 percent in the wrong, you still "support the troops". It's like a wet dream for capitalists.
And it's a recent thing to. It wasn't that way during Vietnam. People genuinely protested what the government was doing back then. Well, that is until Nixon ordered the national guard to open fire on them.
without the government, our lives would be worse. For exampe, we would not have the necessary snaitary services we like and heavily rely on.
I honestly have never heard anything so plainly ridiculous. Are you perhaps unaware that people build and maintain sanitary services? Not government. People.
I have to disagree with your statements for many reasons. First, if we get rid of government fights and riots will begin to rise even higher.
I'm fairly sure that slavetraders used that as an argument for why slavery should not be banned. Slaves need order, and taking it away would lead to fights and riots. In other words, it's an immoral, if not outright stupid argument.
With no currency people are allowed to take what they want
Who says? You literally made that up. The precise opposite is true. With currency people are allowed to take what they want, whereas the people who lack currency get nothing. How is that fair?
First off, you support your statement by mentioning that there would be no emergency services and people would care for themselves, which is terrible because some people can't care for themselves and rely on emergency services, so without them they would die.
You are cherry-picking the things which you agree and disagree with to satisfy your own pre-existing bias. For example, you disagree that no government is a good thing, but have no problem accepting the (false) premise that no government necessarily means no emergency services. This is by no means true, as citizens themselves could easily organise a medical response service. Hence, you are presenting a fallacy known as a false dilemma.
Stop breeding in 3rd world countries
ROFLMAO. Great solution there, Herr Bronto. Ban people from having sex with each other.
Just to clarify the situation, you believe people would ignore a gun ban but obey a sex ban???
LMFAO.
What a total moron you are.
Koch Brothers cock sleeve.
Lol. He's so stupid and such a liar I've given up even arguing with him. His link drops alone tell you everything you need to know. Every one of them laughable.
Did you see that he tried to get away with sourcing "NaturalNews" yesterday? To quote MediaBiasFactCheck: "One of the most discredited sources on the internet".
Whenever he link drops something which I don't want to immediately disregard (i.e. something other than his usual Joseph Goebbels quotes and Youtube links) I look it up and EVERY SINGLE TIME his link has been funded and paid for by right wing corporate lobbyists.
Don't waste time on the moron. Just ignore his dumb ass.
He's literally an open leftist.
ROFLMAO. Similarly, you claim Benito Mussolini, Joseph Goebbels, Jason Kessler, David Duke and Adolf Hitler were/are also "open leftists".
I think anybody with a single shred of intelligence has learned by now to just disregard everything you write as the propaganda of a stupid neo-Nazi retard with serious mental health problems.
NASA says that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit
Yet more fake news from our resident corporate-sponsored Nazi.
And what does the site owner, Andy do? He bans whoever objects to it. See:-
Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
This retarded idiot sits here all day sourcing neo-Nazi websites and telling lies to promote corporate fascism. Anybody who objects is banned.
The US is not a free market economy, I'm not sure such a thing has ever existed.
I'll go even further than that. It's a complete contradiction in terms. The entire basis of a market economy is that nothing should be free, including operating within the market. To operate in the market you have to be able to afford to pay a multitude of overheads, including wages, rent, advertising, packaging, taxes and marketing.
As various scholars have pointed out throughout the years, the real problem is that -- to a large extent -- the ruling class controls language. They are able to make terrible ideas sound marvellous and then market them to the masses.
Let's ban cars too, since road rage is an issue
Let's sell everybody chemical weapons too, since road rage is an issue and people need to defend themselves!!
Shut your retarded face you stupid little basket case.
Guns and cars are a right for adults who can handle them.
Are you kidding me? You aren't born with any rights you impossibly spoilt fat American wanker. Even if you were, cars are for driving and guns are for shooting people.
Shut your mouth you fat stupid idiot. Go and eat a cake or something you useless fuck.
When someone denies the obvious reality of a Creator
Try to wrap your incredibly stupid mind around the fact that your delusional opinion about what is "obvious" counts for less than a fart in the dark. These "rational" people you seem so keen to associate yourself with only care about EVIDENCE. They do not care about your stupid superstitious beliefs from the eleventh century. Understand?
When I see a smooth rounded pebble on the beach I do not automatically assume it must have a creator simply because it looks pretty.
Do you know why?
It's because I'm not a ridiculously stupid retard. That's why.
Proof that it is burritolunch
"Proof" Brontoraptor likes it up the pooper and worships Hitler:-
"I provide you links of Hitler and Mussolini's quotes"
http://www.createdebate.com/browse/
"I like it up my butt because I'm a big gay Nazi"
http://www.createdebate.com/browse/
We understand fully that you agree with Hitler on every issue.
Literally everybody here knows that Nom is on the left and you are on the alt-Reich.
The alt-right, or alternative right, is a loosely-connected and somewhat ill-defined[1] grouping of white supremacists/white nationalists, neo-Nazis, neo-fascists, neo-Confederates, Holocaust deniers, and other far-right[2][3][4] fringe hate groups.[5][6]
Alt-right beliefs have been described as isolationist, protectionist, antisemitic and white supremacist,[7][8][9] frequently overlapping with neo-Nazism,[10][11][12][13] identitarianism,[14] nativism and Islamophobia,[15][16][17][18][19] antifeminism, misogyny and homophobia,[10][20][21][22][13] right-wing populism[23][24] and the neoreactionary movement.[7][25] The concept has further been associated with several groups such as American nationalists, paleoconservatives, anarcho-capitalists, national-anarchists,[26] paleolibertarians, Christian fundamentalists, neo-monarchists, men's rights advocates and the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump.[15][24][25][27][28][14]
According to a Southern Poverty Law Center report published in February 2018, over 100 people have been killed and injured in 13 attacks by alt-right influenced perpetrators since 2014. Political scientists and leaders have argued it should be classified as a terrorist or extremist movement.
