CreateDebate


ThePlague's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of ThePlague's arguments, looking across every debate.
2 points

But compared to real scientific theory, its a VERY low possibility.

You still dont understand. If a deity made a singularity what science will prove he exists? Nothing. You are with the singularity.

Science explains our surroundings. It does not go past that. You are acting as if it does.

Yes they are possible but they are based on an unproved and unsupported premise making them pathetically insignificant compared to current scientific theory

Unproven? You mean it hasn't been proven or disproven. Just making that clear. Again, a scientific theory only explains what we can understand about our surroundings. You act as if science goes beyond that.

No i dont think YOU understand. When you take a natural explaination and tack god onto it it is no longer natural. it becomes supernatural.

This proves that you missed my notion. I won't even repeat myself.

I dont give a shit what your professor said

Funny. I would imagine that he understand more than you do. I would imagine that he has studied this longer than you have. Science is just explanation for occurences. Something cannot be explained because humans are limited. Science cannot even touch the surface of infinity.

We have no reason to even think there IS any grand master behind anything.

YOU don't have a reason. Someone might. If it is a bad reason so what? It is still a reason. So if there is nothing to prove or disprove it stop giving them shit and shut the fuck up and mind your damn business. Otherwise give me a good theory that shows me how we have reduced the possibility of a God.

. Just because one COULD be there doesnt make it true or even likely*5

It doesn't make it impossible or improbable either. Don't leave out those words.

Until you demonstrate that there is good reason to believe there is something behind the universes creation then i dont have to cater to this bullshit.

Sir, I am done. You simply don't understand what I am telling you. You are just the typical Atheist who thinks science can go to infinity and beyond. Science cannot do that. Humans cannot do that. Maybe you will realize that one day.

2 points

You are still being a typical Atheist. God has not be proven or disproven. Therefore possibility remains in tact.

therfore any hypothesis of any kind making assumptions including him are null until he is demonstrated

They remain a possibility. They are not null. Do you even understand this?

This leaves only the natural explainations

Okay, you clearly can't understand the notion I am giving.

. I wont cater to bullshit about unproven deities and giant assumptions that mock our reality and that mock good science.

There you go, again, the typical Atheist. A deity does not mock anything. Science finds explainations. Science cannot explain all things. Science can go far. Science cannot touch infinity. A deity can make a singularity and let it go. Therefore anything Science explains is what is naturally occuring within their realm. The deity still mocks nothing. If this is your last resort I am disappointed. I am an Atheist. I understand a mass majority of Atheist arguments. My college professor showed me how ignorant I was. I used your argument. Many times it has worked. Until my professor explained it to me. We must decode the master image behind our realm. Can we do that? Who knows?

1 point

That is what I answered. Biologically it has to happen. Otherwise we either do photosyntheses or chemosynthesis.

1 point

By atheist bullshit you mean not accepting an unproven, unsupported and generally absurd claim as a equal possibility to real science? Ok

Unproven? Of course. It has never been proven or disproven. 50:50. Next?

Unsupported......now that is just ignorance. Unsupported by what? Science? Lol. That is a no brainer. If a Theist theory holds true then what is Science doing? Explaining God's creation. We are still at 50:50. Next?

Generally absurd? Opinion. Can't dispute that.

What is fake science?

Science: systematic knowledge, esp. of the physical world, gained through observation and experimentation

If you can only obtain information based on what you can observe and God is an infinitly maximal being how will you logically comprehend or understand him? You can't. What observation would you make? Study what God put before you and watch it. That's it. A concept you seem to fail at grasping. Typical Atheist.

Until they've proven this god exists and that he created everything that claim can't be used. It's empty and bullshit and should be dismissed.

How will you prove or disprove it? God is a maximally infinite being. How wilk a human comprehend or understand his works? Mind explaining that logically? Dismissal? Sure. Just shows ignorance.

A god hasn't been proven to exist at all so that claim shouldn't even be taken seriously.

That isn't my point. Here we go again. I told you it's 50:50. A God hasn't been disproven. The claim can be taken seriously. Don't start bullshitting me again.

And no we haven't tested everything in the universe that is impossible but we HAVE tested a fuckton and that is including every single physical law that governs our universe.

Oh so testing everything is impossible? So how can you claim everything is natural if all hasn't been tested and how does that logically disprove that God just didn't make that? I understand our laws. They govern fine.

So we know a ton and yet have ZERO indication of anything supernatural existing or needing to exist.

Where did those laws come from? Hmmm? Again, you are being a typical Atheist. If God can start from a singularity and not touch anything, everything would go naturally on it's own. That is the possibility I am trying to get through to you. Therefore anything you study is just a creation.

It's all natural.

Where did it start?

So when we make theories and hypothesis on what happened at the birth of the universe using Occam's razor we should consider the explainations requiring the least assumptions and speculations and strays from reality.

The fewest assumptions should be selected.

1) God did it.....

2) Thats it.

That is just one assumption. Do you fully underatand the Razor?

So it's either a natural explaination that is supported by evidence and the fact that everything we know is natural and there's no indication of supernatural anywhere, or we completely forgo all the laws of physics and everything we know to make a giant assumption about what is completely outside of space and time dipped into our reality and caused something natural to occur.

Why drop the laws of physics? Why drop any of it? You are being ignorant now. You just assume that if a God started it all that all laws a just broken? That is illogical. The laws would still govern. They would be a creation froma higher order. They would created new things natural from themselves with a natural root to God. Normal logic.

One makes giant unsupported assumptions based on myth. One is based in reality and evidence. It is not 50/50. We don't know for 100% certain yet but for fucks sake it isn't an even toss up not even close.

Now I know you missed the point. If God made a singularity and just let it go what will you be able to describe? The natural qualities of the universe right? That stemmed from what? Ignorance is not a bliss for you as of now. Myth? Sure. Possibility? Yep.

You can't claim that anything is part of a gods creation until that god is proven to exist

Illogical. If I say a God did it it is a logical assumption. You will never understand a maximally infinite being nor its creation. It is ignorant to believe you can especially since we are limited. For example. Can God make a four sided triangle? First if that exists in the realm of physics show me. Otherwise its nonsense. However, a triangle is a shape ordained by man. A polygon is a shape ordained by man. The mindset of a limited individual. Can God make a married bachelor? Can God make a Eukaryotic Prokaryote? No, no, and no. Why? First show me they exist. Then if you cannot show me I declare that nonsese and cannot be equated to a maximal being. If he is omnipotent he cannot do something that makes him non-omnipotent for he is omnipotent. Same argument. Same logic.

I can say something that cannot be proven or disproven. It can be dismissed but it cannot be false or true. Therefore you cannot say I can't say it. Logically I can.

Well tough shit because it is t anywhere close to proven and has NOTHING to support it at all.

You truly missed the notion of my argument. References are above for you. It "ain't" anywher close to being disproven so that tough shit for you. My shit is smooth since I am making the claim. It is tough on you because I can logically continue to say it. It cannot be proven true or false. You can dismiss it and I can continue it. That is how it works.

You can't say, "oh I don't know and you don't know so ahaha were both stupid" no. Sorry.

What? I don't know what? What is the point of posting this if you lack specifications as to what we don't know?

1 point

Which brings us back to the whole God never cures anybody with Down Syndrome thing.

The implication that I gave through simple diction analysis should show you that God is completely capable of doing so. Can you honestly say he has not cured one person? Have you talked to everybody?

1 point

Think about it. It is a dumb question. The best form of communication from a biological stand point would be speech by noises from a mouth of something. If you wish to talk a tongue will be required to formulate those sounds. If people stick random fruits and veggies in their mouth and swallow them then they may continue to devour it. It just makes sense to allow humans to eat.

1 point

So you're implying that asking God to cure a baby with Down Syndrome is something ridiculous

I gave an example. You seem to not be able to understand it. Something that is against the intrinsic tendency of God will not be completed since it does not compell with the teachings of Christ. Asking to be ruler of hell will not be granted. Asking to take over heaven will not be granted. Asking to relieve a child of down syndrome? That is something intrinsic to God's nature.

or that only people with aches, pains and paper cuts actually follow the teachings of Christ?

I see. Paper cuts are most likely healed by platelettes. Aches can be conquered mentally. Pain to what degree? I ran into a wall pain? Or I was just plowed by a semi-trunck pain?

2 points

See? You pulled the typical Atheist argument out. Thats bullshit right? It's actually not. Someone can say science just finds information on God's creation. It will always be 50:50 if the possibilities are available. If those slots can be filled with God made a singularity what can you say? That is improbable? How so? Have you tested to prove that everything comes naturally? Can you show me a singularity? Show me a singularity now. Show me how everything always was. A natural explaination only explains God's creation and cannot logically turn the table and thus leaves the ratio at 50:50. 99:1 is dispicable, ignorant, bullshit. Just break all the fundamentals of logical reasoning? Logically if you can find a Higgs Boson that is great. You are simply finding more about God's creation. You can create a wormhole. You are finding new things in God's creation. Don't give me that Atheist bullshit. I have my reasons and I realized that many Atheists do not.

1 point

Well if God gave you a mouth somebody would eventually try to swallow something and may even like the taste of it.

4 points

I am an Atheist, but one can easily say that God has set this all up and we are simply exploring the many universes he may have created. Universes where laws are different amd we cannot imagine them since we have no measurememt to equate it with. People can create any theory they wish. If one say the Higgs Field gives mass to all things one can say God made that field to keep everything in tact. God can make a singularity and have it travel on its own and can edit what he wishes while following or breaking the laws of that universe. Probability is irrelevant. It is still 50/50. You say all this is natural, what is the starting point? A singularity? Could Gid have made that? Possibly. Then we bring in the Cyclic Model and say why can't God make a universe that goes through these cycles? Is that impossible for a being capable of practically all things? Of course not. Therefore the ratio will always be 1:1. 50:50. No matter what theory one proposes a person can play the role of God could have done this and as a typical non-believer would say "Thats bullshit". They can't really say thay since nobody can prove or disprove it.

1 point

WTF does, "Ask and ye shall receive" mean?

Well that implies that you actually follow the teachings of Christ. Which means you do as he told. That would mean that you can surely be healed. However you cannot ask something ridiculous like "Can I take over heaven?".

excorsice autism

Will you explain how you will "excorsice" a mental deficiency? There is nothing to excorsice.

1 point

I don't see why we shouldn't. It helps us increase our understanding of how organisms have adapted over the years.

1 point

Okay. You dispute me just to tell me that? The user wasn't misbehaving or anything.

ThePlague(218) Clarified
1 point

The bible says God made them. Biogenesis says they typically originated from a single celled common organism. That's it. The bible says God made them. Science says otherwise. Humans, by evolutionary studies, shows us the relation we have with all species which implies a common ancestor. We are even related to bacteria.

1 point

That is because they choose to serve us. In all practicallity if they wanted to stoo they can because they have the power to and thus are potentially a threat. To our eyes they are obligated to serve us the way we deem fit. The constitution is something that we believe binds us. What would happen if the Government burns it? Burns all laws? The Government is never obligated to a 100% degree of certainty. You see what I am saying?

1 point

A few friends of mine understand that. That is why they have the Bible App. It has many versions. Multiple Christians will read different versions of the bible.

1 point

Bacteria. They will always dominate. Bacteria help all of us survive. Without them we die.

1 point

Would you mind telling me who Andy is? I have seen his name a few times before. I haven't seen a uaer named Andy.

1 point

I do not understand why you were banned. I agree with you though. I never saw Twitter as useful.

1 point

Personally I never cared, but since I am in favor of tons of liberty I think you should not restrict them from marrying. I don't care if it is legalized. Just change the Federal definition and we are done.

1 point

Well in all technicallity bacteria are all the smallest kinds of organisms ranging in different shapes and sizes. However if the bacteria is of the genus Mycoplasma the bacteria usually measure to be only 0.3 micrometres. Which is really small.

The largest as of now are the Thiomargarita namibiensis. It is a gram-negative coccoid Proteobacteriu found in Nambia's contenential shelf. They can be up to 0.75 mm. This means that they can be seen by the naked eye. This is the most "massive" bacteria.

Faster growth or faster traveling? I shall do both.

There is no faster traveling bacteria but they can reach speeds of 200 microns a second (primarily polar bacteria).

Faster growing population varies too, but in my studies one of the fastest is the Clostridium perfringens. The can have a new generation in approximately ten minutes.

There is no offical "most dangerous bacteria" but E. Coli, Tetanus, or Clostridium Botulinum since one microgram of them can be lethal. So I would typically give the title to Clostridium Botulinum. It is the most deadly in my opinion.

I have never studied the drinking rate of bacteria when the constant was beer. Lol.

1 point

What is wrong with you? Learning these things cam save your life one day.

1 point

Anything! What do you want to talk about? Bacterial resistance to drugs over climate resistance? Is medicine the cause of stronger bacteria over simple evolution?

ThePlague(218) Clarified
1 point

Did I claim that this happened? No. It's am incredibly slow process. It leads to the rise of humanity. Not divine intervention.


2 of 10 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]