CreateDebate


Viceregent's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Viceregent's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

More generally, how will a lawsuit settle this issue? Do not speak in terms of Trump, but your notions of the purpose of the judiciary?

1 point

I ask this loser to prove he is intelligent and rational and he immediately and irrationally changes the subject and proves the opposite.

What a fool. ROFL

2 points

Not a scientist, eh? We know the universe did not arise by natural means out of nothing due up the 1st Law of Thermo and that the universe is not eternal due to the 2nd Law. It is not your ignorance that is the problem, but your anti-science naturalism.

1 point

Is it possible that all of reality proves Hod’s existence, but you are too mentally ill to comprehend, understand and/or accept reality?

1 point

Prove these claims, snowflake? Or should we take them as evidence you are mentally ill?

1 point

That is funny given the sheer volume of murderers committed by atheists in the last 100 years.

1 point

He says He does. That is good enough for all but the mentally ill.

1 point

Show me a “concept” using only your senses? Or any other non-material thing.

1 point

I understand you are not a philosopher and therefore just make crap up to suit your purposes. But you cannot prove your definition is right.

1 point

If am allowed to say my self interest is that I not murder then I am allowed to say my self interest is that I do murder. Again, you have removed morality from the equation. If a man rapes and murders your daughter, you may not like his choice, but you have no moral grounds to object.

1 point

Yes, per naturalism, all things in nature must have a naturalist explanation, which means tested via the scientific method. If it exists, it is detectable by the senses. As non-material things are, by definition, not detectable by the senses, they do not exist under naturalism. No non-material things = materialism.

And the issue is not why don't atheists murder or not murder. The issue is can an atheist provide a rational, non-arbitrary, universal reason not to murder. The answer is no starting with the idea we are all nothing but stardust.

So the better question to you is why not murder? If all you can give me is your personal preference, you have embraced the problem.

1 point

Right, atheism destroys morality, making do not rate children no more worthy than do not eat rocky road ice cream. It is why no moral person is an atheist.

1 point

Naturalism logically leads to materialism, for their is no natural explaination for the non-material.

1 point

No, moron, naturalism is what I said. Materialism is the denial of all non-material things”.

And, moron, we have been over this. Atheism = naturalism.

This is why atheists stay stupid. They prefer cliches to reality.

1 point

The burden of proof is on you. Prove that is the right morality instead of its opposit? If you cannot, then your view is arbitrary, your opinion, with no binding force

1 point

You did, skid mark? What was your answer?

This fool is a liar.

1 point

Of course you project your foolishness onto others. It fits with you being delusional and narcissistic. Prove your claim or shut up, moron.

1 point

Yep, I knew he would run away. What a pathetic loser.

Because they are dumb as a box of rocks, these fools always run when you put them to the proof.

1 point

No, mental midget, I was giving you the scientific fact undergirding my claim. You continue to prove you are dumb as a box of rocks.

No, I want debate, regardless of what you think is debate, you deluded narcissist.

I am telling you who you should talk too to make your irrelevant point relevsnt. Yep, dumb as a boxofrocks.

What narcissism, mental midget?

I presume this? Prove it, head case

The fact that you must parrot me proves you are dumb as a box of rocks.

Now say something intelligent with your next post or be banned.

1 point

Pond scum, I need a good laugh. Tell me how I said the opposite?

1 point

Actually, butt wipe, I get it. I just destroyed your nonsense about abortion and sodomy.

1 point

Experience with 1000s of those fools, and I do not care what you think debate is for.

Pond scum, it was the atheist moron who thought they could be related. Your argument is with him. Again, no one cares about your subjective feelings about the truth. Get help for that narcissism.

And you confirm atheists are dumb as s box of rocks. Thanks.

1 point

How foolish. I do not mind being told I cannot murder another with my body and that I should only have moral sex. What a foolish post by you.

1 point

As an atheist, this fool has no idea what morality should be. And study the atheist David Hume to learn what science cannot deal with ethics. Once again, you prove atheists are irrational and dumb as a box of rocks.


1 of 19 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]