All breaks duration is same
I mean all breaks in test matches .. ..........
Are same.....
17 mins break ..............17 or 25 ...........................,...........
Yeah it is religion in india,Pakistan, srilanka and Bangladesh............ And many more
It has lunch break for rest and its name is just lunch break,not players really had a lunch at this break only
It has lunch break for rest and its name is just lunch break,not players really had a lunch at this break only
The goal makes u entertain in football
Yes or no......,..........................
I mean there should be no lunch break in football bcz it don't need break in just 90 mins match
But if play is going for 5 hrs there is need to have lunch break
And 1 thing I want to tell u that its name is lunch break but its a simple break like in football after 45 mins
In cricket u have to know weakness of everypeson in team
Not by knowing only about u, u have to play by remembering what's going all 4 sides not by only remembering what's going in just front of u
In cricket u have to know weakness of everypeson in team
Not by knowing only about u, u have to play by remembering what's going all 4 sides not by only remembering what's going in just front of u
In cricket u have to know weakness of everypeson in team
Not by knowing only about u, u have to play by remembering what's going all 4 sides not by only remembering what's going in just front of u
In cricket u have to know weakness of everypeson in team
Not by knowing only about u, u have to play by remembering what's going all 4 sides not by only remembering what's going in just front of u
Cricket takes more time but we don't get bore bcz whole time action like wickets ,extras ,sixes ,fours but in tennis every time ball one to another nothing better happens
Do u people get excited bcz of ball hitting from one end to another end in tennis
But in cricket six,four,run out catchout,bold sport get interesting bcz of its moment not bcz hot chicks, money ,countries playing ,popularity its interesting bcz of enjoyable
In middle I too guess why will be there the lunch break in 90 mins match there should be the lunch break in 5 days match and there lunch break only in one format of cricket and the sport doesn't get boring because of lunch break
That's the power of cricket in India
India had more fans of cricket ,
Than the fans of football in Brazil
5 days of cricket match is not considered to be boring in India
No the Brazilian will never ever come to watch 5 days match of football
If they had Never watch it so how could they know that it is not interesting
Even the football will be twice it will be much boring think if football will be played for 5 days it will toooo boring but in cricket in 5 days match the ground is full everytime in India while test match of 5 days while India is playing will the Brazilians come to watch 5 days match of football?
How could they know that cricket is boring if they never watch it?
5. All commentator do in a football match "Kaka.. Kaka to ronadinho, to giberto, passes it to Julio...". (Thanks, vuvuzella, now they are not required to do even this much!). While in cricket, you have to analyze each and every delivery or if its IPL, tell the whole world about the MRF blimp hanging in the sky. Thus, making the job of commentators tougher and more professional!
6. Cricketers get full clothes to wear along with safety gears like helmet, pads, ell guard, chest guard. While footballers only get a small nicker to wear. Thus clearly showing that cricketers are richer and very well fed!
7. In terms of weekly salary to players, IPL is ranked No.2 in the world after NBA, while EPL is at 4. Again showing cricketers are richer than footballers! Refer Virat Kohli named sixth most marketable athlete ahead of Messi, Ronaldo
8. Talking about popularity, here are some stats- Total population of 32 nations participating in football: 1541 millions. Population of just 3 cricket frantic nations (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) : 1572 millions. Clearly, cricket is popular among more people!
. Even the shortest version of cricket is twice as longer than any football match, thus providing entertainment for longer duration of time!
2. In football, for 90 minutes you wait and wait for a goal which may or may not happen. But in cricket there is some action-a six, four, bowled, run out- on virtually every ball. Thus, providing more reasons to cheer!
3. Football provides just one time slot (i.e half time) for advertisers, while in cricket there are atleast 40 time slots (in T20 format). And then, if its IPL you can have ads in between deliveries also. Thus, making it more commercially viable!
4. In football, for majority of the time you are shown just one camera angle. But in cricket, broadcasting is a challenge! You need cameras in every corner of the ground, you require technologies like hawk-eye, speedometer, snicko-meter, zoomer, hotspot. Thus making cricket more technologically advance!
U mean that goal makes it enjoyable na ..............................
If u don't watch cricket than how can u say that its boring that's only the problem of every football countries like brazil never watches cricket and says its boring they don't know there is also better game than football
Tell me which other things make u enjoyable in football rather than a goal?
