CreateDebate


Werewolfie17's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Werewolfie17's arguments, looking across every debate.

I believe that the word has nothing to do with it. Some people propose a 'civil union'. Well. So and so's girlfriend did not ask her to 'civil union' me. And besides. If a gay couple respects 'marriage' as a union between a man and a woman, why can a straight couple not recognize 'marriage' between a man and a man or a woman and a woman?

I believe it is personally legitimate to, a certain degree, allow judgments to be based upon a male's hair length. Hearken back to the sixties and seventies when people were sex and drug addicts, people have no choice but to relate and discriminate. While I do not agree that they are freaks, I do agree that it is entirely unnecessary for men to have long hair. What purpose does it serve? If you say it's your right to individuality, then you must be willing to make sacrifices for it. If you are applying for a job, you're sacrificing your individuality either way. It's your choice, there are pros and cons with each choice you make in life. I agree that it IS just hair. But people's looks are half of the first impression. Most males do not take the time to take care of their hair. They normally put it in a pony tail. Therefore, it looks incredibly unprofessional, greasy, and on top of that, immature. What purpose does long hair serve?

There was a study done with Rhesus monkeys in the 70s...About 1500 of them. They were strapped to sleds and pushed down a hill. All had seat belts. They crashed into a wall at the end of the hill.

All of the monkeys survived. Yay for seat belts!!!

Wait...

Monkey number 251 had 8 broken ribs, hemorrhaging, a broken arm, and a dislocated hip.

Monkey number 479 was broken in half at the base of his spine and put to sleep shortly after the test.

1326 of the 1500 monkeys died within thirty minutes after the test.

Result - Seat belts make no difference; if anything, they make things worse.

4 points

All TV shows are written down as scripts (a form of book) first...

10 points

Not necessarily. You might be able to exercise with television and electronics, but think about where your brain is going. Did you know that television and other gaming systems are the main cause of ADD and ADHD? Other people, like a friend of mine with epilepsy, cannot do watch television or play games. He is a bodybuilder and writes books. He is well informed in Elizabethan literature and other works from the earlier centuries of time. So it boils down to how you spend your time, and how you live your life. You may get muscles while exercising during a TV episode of Spongebob, but you also probably lost ten points of your IQ. You can choose to be entertained and be healthy physically, or you can choose to be entertained, be healthy physically, AND make yourself smarter.

You are making assumptions that our economy would be better and taxes would decrease if the National Park Service was abolished...

Pardon me sir, natural wonders of the world that exist in our own back yards. Excuse me...

So you are saying as the dominant, most sentient being on this planet, we have no responsibility to take care of it? To maintain ourselves as the dominant species?

The red wolf was actually a lower class of wolves that other wolves preyed upon. That does not make them at the top of the food chain. I thought we were as primary hunters, or did I miss that fact too?

Did you forget bears that are native to the same region as the red wolf? If your excuse is that for a wolf, what is it for the protected Brown Pelican?

Yes, I believe I did. Or do you actually lack such insight to infer the deeper meaning from said animated movie?

I also noticed how you didn't argue with my other points...Do you concede those to me?

Wall-E's message is simple. If the Earth is not taken care of, it will not exist. Unfortunately for those blobs of fat that sit at their computer wishing everything else would fade away, we do not have the space age technology to send us into space for five hundred years. In other words, take care of the only planet we do have. Or die. Simple enough for you, yes?

You're saying if an alien race thousands of years ahead of us technology wise came to earth to probe you, perhaps kill you, you'd be okay with that because you were the inferior specie and that was your price to pay?

Do your research - The Rosies of World War 2. All the women went to work in the factories while the men were off fighting. They had to work hard and long hours. And as soon as the men got back, they got laid off and forgotten. Hardly seems far to me.

6 points

First of all men, in the warring all-female dominant tribes of the Amazon, men were prisoners. And had no rights.

Second of all, scientists have almost perfected a way to transform an egg cell into a sperm cell. For the smart ones, that means that males would no longer be necessary to reproduce.

Third, the only thing females lack that men have is upper body strength. And that's just a majority. There are still females that have linebacker shoulders and can run a guy over on the line.

Hmm. Let's see. Any brilliant comebacks guys?

Oh and when the Russians implemented females into their sniper schools, they discovered that females have better dexterity, eyesight, and composure behind a gun from long distance. Thus, the Russians doted on their female warriors.

Not to mention that it has also been proven that females are genetically smarter than males.

Okay, I'm done.

Actually all they have to do is stand over the toilet, it's not that hard...

You do realize that:

1. Without the wolves, a species dies. Causing another secondary species to die.

2. Without Mt. Rushmore or other monuments, our culture will die, and so will our society and nation.

3. If the rangers are not paid, who will take care of them? Without trees, you would die. Ever taken biology? Ya know that thing we breathe called oxygen? Trees produce it. If you want to kill a tree, you could commit suicide because you exhale the CO2 they need to survive as well.

Or perhaps you are just an anarchist who doesn't care for anyone but himself.

I also must as you to how many places you have been outside of your home. Have you ever experienced such majesty firsthand? To see the heart and soul of a man, his passion, immortalized in stone? The image of four of the world's greatest leaders emblazoned on a mountainside?

What did wolves do to you?

Watch Wall-E. Because in a few hundred years, that'll be your kids.

While I understand your argument and thank you for your respect, I have a disagreement.

One of the reasons the Civil Rights movement for African Americans broke off from Women's Rights in the late 1800s because the Women's Rights would never be listened to or whatever, yada yada. In other words. Black leaders believed that the female Idealists were crazy and their purpose would never be listened to. But yet, both things changed. It was hard - Difficult to change, difficult to police. People died, but the Civil Rights Movement was successful anyway, correct?

However, I am by no means saying that this argument has a right to be scaled with the Civil Rights movement.

2 points

No. The rangers regulate the animal populations and keep track of endangered species. Taking their funds away would not only doom certain species (I.e. the red wolf, whose numbers reached as low as 17), but monuments like Yellowstone, Mount Rushmore, and other historical landmarks could not be preserved for future generations. Are you trying to deny your kids the opportunity to see some of the best things this nation has?

I believe this argument is absolutely pointless. If you are a drunk, and want equal rights, (which by the way you already do) why should it bother you if gays have rights? Are you jealous? Ha, you need to grow up and be mature. Were you drunk when you started this argument? Because if you think about it, logically (and while you're sober), this IS ridiculous. How can you compare gays to druggies and drunks? They aren't menaces to society. They don't get into fights with those they love because their minds are gone. They don't pose a threat to you in any way.

By the way, my best friend is gay. And guess what? Their father was killed in a car accident by a drunk driver, not a gay driver.

That student has a GPA of 4.25 and is attending the most prestigious college in the southeast. Perhaps you would like to tell her father that she's doing so well in life.

The driver that killed her father lived and went onto rehab, living a normal life, with no recollection of what he did.

2 points

You say it is in the Bible? Give me a verse, please.

Are you being judgmental?

Matthew 7:1 Judge not, lest ye be judged.

Romans 14:9-13 For this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that He might be Lord both of the dead and living. But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God. For it is written, as I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God. Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

Sounds like you're judging your brothers and sisters to me...

Or if you wanted to go strictly by the Bible...Read this.

6 " 'No one is to approach any close relative to have sexual relations. I am the LORD.

7 " 'Do not dishonor your father by having sexual relations with your mother. She is your mother; do not have relations with her.

8 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your father's wife; that would dishonor your father.

9 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your sister, either your father's daughter or your mother's daughter, whether she was born in the same home or elsewhere.

10 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your son's daughter or your daughter's daughter; that would dishonor you.

11 " 'Do not have sexual relations with the daughter of your father's wife, born to your father; she is your sister.

12 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your father's sister; she is your father's close relative.

13 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your mother's sister, because she is your mother's close relative.

14 " 'Do not dishonor your father's brother by approaching his wife to have sexual relations; she is your aunt.

15 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your daughter-in-law. She is your son's wife; do not have relations with her.

16 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your brother's wife; that would dishonor your brother.

17 " 'Do not have sexual relations with both a woman and her daughter. Do not have sexual relations with either her son's daughter or her daughter's daughter; they are her close relatives. That is wickedness.

18 " 'Do not take your wife's sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living.

19 " 'Do not approach a woman to have sexual relations during the uncleanness of her monthly period.

20 " 'Do not have sexual relations with your neighbor's wife and defile yourself with her

This is Leviticus Chapter 18, a majority of it. Read it carefully. Do you see a place that says, "Do not have sexual relations with your daughter'? Yeah didn't think so. MEN wrote the Bible. God did not come down to Earth and pen it Himself. I am a very faithful Christian, and let me tell you. Men ALWAYS want what they want. They wrote those things in there because they wanted to sound right and just. They just happened to leave out the one that they enjoyed, incest between the father and daughter. Know why? Because back then, the daughter was considered property of the father. Since that's in the Bible, you want to go by this?

Or perhaps since polygamy is in the Bible, that makes it okay too, yes? You can't pick and choose what you believe the Bible says, you have to go by it all. Am I right?

2 points

If it were a black student being teased or harassed, the school would step in and have a fit.

If it were a Mexican student was being messed with, people would stop it.

If it was a special Ed student being picked on, you'd go to jail.

Why is being gay/lesbian any different?

2 points

Think of all the games the 360 has that the PS3 doesn't. Think of the bonus things it comes with; Arcade, Live, Millions of other online gamers, free promos, free music stations. The possibilities are endless. The PS3 was just their way of an argument product to the 360 because the PS2 was losing money.

2 points

I believe that they should.

Do the Nazis who were just doing their jobs, gassing and slaughtering the Jews, all because they were following orders, get a free pass?

Do the firemen who hosed down African American protesters in the streets of Birmingham and Selma get a get-out-of-jail free card?

Answer those two for me and I'll swap sides.

2 points

I actually believe it is, and have come to terms with this fact a long time ago myself. Speaking on a Civil Rights basis, Martin Luther King is one of my most revered idols. Many of his quotes relate to the hate that gays receive.

"Like an unchecked cancer, hate corrodes the personality and eats away its vital unity. Hate destroys a man's sense of values

and his objectivity. It causes him to describe the beautiful as ugly and the ugly as beautiful, and to confuse the true with the false

and the false with the true".

"Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that."

Unfortunately I do not remember the last one, naturally the best one, nor can I find it.

I wholeheartedly believe that if Mr. King was alive today, he would fight for gay rights. He fought for equality. Is that not what the gays want? Of course it is. So by denying them rights, and by saying that their movement has nothing to do with the Civil Rights movement, you are in fact saying that gays are less than whites, blacks, Mexicans, Indians, Native Americans, etc. Is that what you mean?

I do agree that the Civil Rights movement was largely more important in our nation's history than the gay movement, but they are similar. Scary similar.

As for what have gays endured? Ask them. They risk losing their jobs. Disowned by friends, family, and church. Many believe they risk salvation only because of their orientation. If you fall in love with someone who happens to be the same sex as you, is it under your control? Gays have undergone persecution very similar to the blacks. Some are murdered. Some are publicly humiliated and kicked out of their homes. Did you know that? I am friends with such people. Do not say what you do not know; it's called false information.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]