- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Junk food is bad effect you body .
I suggest quit junk food . People don't want to quit junk food themselves but that is lazy . Many people overweight and unfit now a day . Few year ago I could'n endure eating junk food and drinking soda juice but I quit .
Endure eating junk food help me keep body balance good weight .
You don't get it, the only reason (and I mean ONLY) that you're not a slave serving pharaohs to this date is the notion the Blues had which ended up convincing the white aliens and which even the blacks sympathised with that the human is more than a pet to them. They rewrote history so it would be humans who were pharaohs and not them and then began to experiments with many ways to manipulate humans to reach their full potential but within a few generations of Ancient Greece, the reds had already grown bored and began stirring up dictatorships even harsher and less fair to those that worked hardest than Ancient Egypt (in Egypt you wouldn't get raped or beaten at total random for fun but in Persia and many African Tribes that remained past ancient Egypt you ended up being able to be victimised at random).
Then the reds agreed with the whites to create the banking system which first required the seemingly simple idea that we need a way to 'trade' when you don't want what I have but I want what you have. It began simple, even governments (at that time still entirely unfair oligarchies) traded around ideas and it should be known that Zeus, Thor etc were all Red aliens meeting humans and posing, same with the Roman gods and even the gods of Ancient Egypt. The reds are 'smarter' than the blues in raw IQ but they struggle with a lot of emotional issues and proneness to rage easily and displease Fiora as well as the other demigods.
There is so much to understand but in short, the blues worked with the whites to propagate round-earth theory and make a lie the Reds came up with become true as they realised it's so ingenious how it prevents us going to either Pole (there's no south pole) and they realised it would be better if the dumber among us were simplified and the smarter, harder workers 'joined' a collective group of highly productive, intelligent people. If an intelligent, productive group or person doesn't join them, they easily can work around them and play nice via market manipulation and bankruptcy and coming in as angel investors but the Reds didn't like this approach as it implied loyalty should be valued above raw talent and refined skill.
Meanwhile the 'blacks' inspired the group Anonymous but also are responsible for Antifa and if you backtrack throughout time and scripture you will see that it was them who got in touch with Moses and if you really think about it Moses was using black magic, not white magic at any stage. They are the only hope if you truly want 'freedom' but they always lose in the long run (but consistently win in many short-term battles as they own the right to create antimatter at will and they run 'entropy' which is a core element of any reality Fiora creates that she can't rig).
Rotschchilds work for the reds.
If I'm not mistaken their family name actually translates to "red shield".
Soros is leader of the blue regime
I guess you're not the good guys after all. I'm going back to the reds lol. (actually I think I would choose none of them and start my own color, I'll be whatever color gamma rays would be if I could see them)
That reminds me, why would aliens from another dimension use only colors that are visible to humans?
The problem is that the term "Jew" originally referred to the religion of the Hebrews. Judaism IS a religion and certain groups of people arbitrarily named themselves after it and turned it into a race. This is not "science" but meaningless arbitrary social construct crap. Excon is not a hebrew and he is not a jew, he is the descendant of polish people who named themselves after a religion. A lot of "Jews" are actually descended in part from the hebrews, but the hebrews as a people do not exist because there gene pool has been thoroughly mixed with other gene pools, so technically "gods chosen people" don't exist and if you associate yourself with judaism in modern times you are associating with a hebrew supremacist religion that says the majority of your DNA is inferior and comes from savages. On top of this, many if not most jews have no connection to the hebrews and are "jew" by conversion only, which makes them even more retarded for calling themselves jews.
If you believe in any religion you are retarded
If you believe you are special because of your race you are scum
If you believe you are special because you believe you are a race that you are not and think that a religion your ancestors practiced is actually your race you are retarded scum.
I understand that there is an issue (and I agree with you and FM, it is actually a core issue with the geneology of the word 'Jew' in most languages especially English). The issue is that Jew, in the colloquial sense (which excon is using it and which you and FM don't admit exists) is a race. The race varies in the whiter-end towards Caucasian of the Mr. Burns facial type [Ashkenazi] and towards the other end they literally could pass for Kurd/Arab mix [raw Hebrew Jew].
The OTHER definition of Jew (and being Jewish) is indeed the definition that you and FM so fervently raise which is an adherent of the religion of Judaism. The definitions get EVEN MORE intertwined as you must actually be a member of the Semitic races to qualify as a 'true Jew' of the alternate definition (the religious one) so it's even more connected as the main Semitic race is the Hebrew and Ashkenazi Jews.
the Government fears an armed nation
Oh shut up you moron. You're living in the seventeenth century. The government has absolutely no fear because nine out of every ten of you cries when you see the American flag and you get your information from places like Fox News. You are so naive and easy to manipulate that the government could subdue you with soft words, without ever touching its staggering arsenal of weapons and trained personnel. Civilians were armed when Nixon openly ordered the military to shoot Vietnam protesters, and what did they do? Nothing. The American government sanctioned the murder of 3,000 of its own citizens on 9/11 to give itself a pretext for war and what did they do? NOTHING. You are just not living in reality and it's as simple as that.
People think that adding more gun laws will make it so gun-related crimes will go down but it's not.
No, they don't "think" that. They can prove it.
Adding more gun laws just make it harder on the innocent people to protect themselves.
Complete unadulterated rubbish. This bizarre Americanism where you try to separate the world into good guys and bad guys is so retarded it belongs in a children's novel. Armed people are more dangerous than unarmed people and that's just a fact. Arms dealers don't conduct a deep psychological analysis to find out who is "innocent" and who is not "innocent", and neither can they predict what people will do in the future. Essentially, your argument is that "innocent" people need to buy guns in order to protect themselves from all the non-innocent people you've sold guns to. It's circular reasoning of the most egregious nature.
people who are using guns for bad are not going to stop because of more laws
Again, this is almost impossibly stupid. When people break the law, we should not reward them by making whatever they have done legal. That's quite literally insane. Bad people are not going to stop murdering and raping just because the law says they aren't allowed to do it, so following your crazy attempt at logic we should let "innocent" people rape and murder as well, to level out the playing field.
Nowhere is the insanity of Americans better exemplified than in their views about guns.
Sadly this issue has made it to mainstream politics and the Government fears an armed nation as they are stealing the wealth of the citizens and fear that at some point the citizens will realize this and revolt. It is their best interest to ban Guns. So they try to us every shooting incident they can to convince the public that they are in danger because of guns while doing nothing to actually improve anyone's safety. I live in a rural area where 9 out of 10 people are gun owners. The murder by gun rate is about 1 every 3 years. In a three county area. Compare that to places with very strict gun laws like DC, Chicago, NYC, Los Angeles, ect. It's very provable that gun restrictions don't work.
This is the first time in a long time that I've seen you take a properly right-wing stance
Obviously you haven't been paying close attention to his typical right wing smear attacks, science denial and generalised lying. ExCon is a classic right wing moron who would sooner burn to death than admit being wrong. The only people he is even civil with on the site are the hard right wing toolbags like bronto and Amarel. Everybody on the left hates him. He's a lying pro-Israeli imbecile who desperately wants people to believe he's Jewish.
A teacher was fired from a Florida school because she gave the students who didn't turn in assignments a 0. The school has a "no zero" policy which gives the students a minimum of 50% if they don't turn anything in. I've always believed if you don't turn in your homework, you get a 0....no credit, so for me it is nonsense that they would get a 50% doing nothing. Do you agree with the teacher or the school?
Does the above work on college campie there Jewel ?????????
This is the first time in a long time that I've seen you take a properly right-wing stance where you stop pretending that you're left-wing at all. This mentality is letting life curse a few poor decisions and bad luck so brutally and reward good luck so unfairly well.
You should know exactly what the issue with letting the poor rot is.
If I owe $100,000 student debt & have low paying job, was it an education?
If you didn't get educated, that's on you.. If you didn't graduate, that's on you too.. If you didn't learn how to get a job, yes - that's on you. If you got educated in the wrong field, that too, is on you..
Whaddya want from us?
There is absolutely no way the school would SUE HER for this, no jury is going to guilty her for this and if it's a 'lowkey' kind of reparation suing, she really didn't cost the students or the school much.
Firing isn't suing. It's like when people say that Alex Jones is entitled to first amendment rights on YouTube or Twitter... No, he's not.
The fact is, if you work for an institution you gotta know the rules.
Look, if I work for your institution and you have a dumb rule, I'd do my best to reason with you but at the end of the day no war is won by soldiers completely refusing to follow orders but I will admit some wars have been avoided by said rebellious attitudes. The fact is, you need to know your place and work with the system to improve it, you can't just be raw chaos to the institution and expect to 'win' by fighting against the very thing you claim to want to improve.
If the policy says don't give below 50%, you need to obey just as much as you want the children to obey you when you say 'do homework'. I may not be a fan of Gandhi but one of his best quotes ever was 'be the change you want to see in the world' and while it seems the teacher was following this at first, the teacher was disregarding the rules and regulations of the superiors she had just as she found the lazy (or perhaps busy) students of her class were doing to her.
What should be the government’s role in mental health?
There is a significant problem with psychiatry/psychology--who is the 100% "sane" authority that dictates what is "crazy" or not(?) In fact, psychiatry itself has gone 'insane', as anything that deviates from "gender neutral, sedentary, numb, pacifist", now has a "diagnosis" in the DSM. Psychologists are overwhelmingly liberal feminists, and view the world through that particular lens. This has already, and is increasingly, become a serious issue in our society, particularly with the encroachment of "mental health" into the 2nd amendment restrictions discussion.
Honestly, look at how people reacted to Kanye West stating he wants to affiliate with the Republican Party. They said he needs to be hospitalized--literally (which can actually happen, btw). We are not all too far before things could (potentially) start to get really, really ugly in this respect.
If it were changed to "Life Coaching--personal & marital" with each therapist/coach stating their viewpoint/bias upfront, I would have absolutely zero issue with it (in fact, I'm sure it could potentially be quite beneficial when someone finds a 'coach'/therapist that fits with them well). However, the current state of things is dangerous, where it is called "science", and one is able to say "objectively", this philosophy of life and human behavior is "normal"/'sane' and everything else veers toward 'abnormal'/'insane'. Further, and the largest issue, is that people can be forcibly hospitalized by the state if they are called in claimed to be a "danger" to others or themselves--which is exactly what Don Lemon & others were suggesting about Kanye.