CreateDebate


The Public Waterfall RSS

Every argument gets a chance to be on top!
The Public Waterfall shows you all arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

No humanitarian pipe dreams! Selfishness to the max..

Again You are going to waste your life.

Fuck humans- they suck..

you are also the one..

1 point

Hello antisemite,

Ahhhh. So, YOU’RE the new iteration of hater that we have to deal with. I understand why you keep changing your name. I’d hide too.

DNA is science. You’re the one who denies it. Of course, DNA doesn’t show religion. It shows ethnicity. Clearly, SCIENTIFICALLY, my DNA shows that Jews are a race. You don’t like that. For whatever reason, it scares the shit out of you.

Later hater.

excon

Mingiwuwu(673) Clarified
1 point

To me Paz is always the best on any track he's on (yes, he'd out-rap Webby as Webby enjoys helping other rappers sound good when he does duos) this is no exception but Madchild was phenomenal as usual yes.

The reason I don't consider Madchild on par with paz but he's easily in my top 20 somewhere in the lower levels is because his voice is SO irritating to listen to but on top of that, he cheats by completely ignoring grammar to make an unfair amount of rhymes in ways others can't due to their more semi-regimented sentence structure.

1 point

so name one

Hello bront,

I have one. Trump demands loyalty, but doesn’t return it. He’s leaving Michael Cohen to shrivel in the wind. I dunno why. Michael Cohen probably has the dirt that can spell the end of the orange man. If I were Trump, I’d bring Cohen in from the cold.

excon

I wrestle bears and drink protein shakes laced with gasoline and bleach.

YOU THINK YOU BE JOHNNY DANGEROUS WHEN YOU FIFTY DEEP.

BUT YOU A COWARD WHEN YOU BY YOURSELF.

Have you considered seeing a vet for that rash? Maybe he can do something about that rampant right wing indoctrination too.

Yeah, that Whoopie.. . Her politics are like mine

Wow, you must be a dick faced pangolin monkey. If you agree with more than 2% of what they say on the view you need to re-examine your life.

I call BS. From your own experience of both ME and AL, have either of us EVER called you EVIL?????

You are nice to conservatives but call REAL leftists science deniers and anti-semites. Who's side are you on? You already admitted it, you're on the side of capitalism with pseudo-leftist undertones.

This is how old people work out. I wrestle bears and drink protein shakes laced with gasoline and bleach.

Learn real rap that sounds decent despite being hardcore insanely well-lyrically-constructed.

Madchild killed it, loki (the guy who looks like a neanderthal) was the worst of the bunch and pretty much sucked. the other guy and paz did alright.

Cute. Now to show you how to rap beautifully even when drunk and/or stoned.

Nice, that wasn't bad at all.

Noms rhymes:

I'm clumsy

I have sex with trees

Theirs sperm in my eyes, I can't see

I have a masters degree

in marxist philosophy

Fact's rhymes:

the prime directive

is to make you die, molested

my minds defective

cause as a child I was deprived, neglected

so now I'll try disectin' your neck with knives the size of texas

(Notice how all my rhymes are rhyming multiple syllables whereas as you are merely pinching a rhyme out of the end of each word like a constipated loaf of stupidity)

but you use no rhymes

Annunaki

prophecy

autopsy

CLEARLY MY RHYMES ARE ON A MUCH DEEPER LEVEL.

1 point

This is just out July 20th. Learn real rap that sounds decent despite being hardcore insanely well-lyrically-constructed.

This is what real hardcore rap sounds like.
1 point

Cute. Now to show you how to rap beautifully even when drunk and/or stoned.

Webby
1 point

How dare you tell people to "grow some balls" when only a few months ago you were pro-choice. What a hypocrite.

1 point

We've done this song and dance before. It's even less interesting the second time around.

1 point

Amarel is actually one of the few thoughtful and reasoned debaters on this forum. By comparison, your unsound presupposition is rather trite.

Jace(4655) Clarified
2 points

Your response presupposes you answered the question. Since when is self concept a requisite for personhood? My response will presuppose that it isn’t.

The framing of the question wasn't coherent to me, so I took it as a rhetorical device setting up your more particular observation. I'm still not entirely sure what you mean by "since when", but I take you to perhaps mean "why"?

The idea that self concept is requisite for personhood is hardly as unusual as you seem to suggest it is. Multiple definitions of person(hood) define that concept ins terms of the self, and the self is regularly defined as an individual as the object of their own reflective consciousness. This contingency of personhood on self is also evident in various legal and social practices, such as the treatment of brain dead patients, so it's not unheard of in practice either.

That this premise is warranted conceptually and practicably, however, is likely not sufficient proof to the unpersuaded since not all definitions necessarily associate the two ideas together in this fashion and not all people agree with the practices this view currently justifies. So I'll elaborate:

'Person' is a purely abstract conception which we project onto an observed, material reality; there is no objectively extant 'person'. It requires conscious reflection to conceive of and apply 'person', which is not an act which a non-conscious entity can engage in. The concept of 'person' exists to call out a collection of entities based on some real or supposed mutual attribute(s). The function of this classification is to orient the ascribing consciousness and its behaviors in relation to its environment, including other consciousness. For a consciousness to find itself in the classification of 'person', it must be self-aware consciousness (i.e. it has self-concept).

While such a self-conceiving consciousness might ascribe 'person' to a non-self-conceiving entity, it is unclear why it would do so. Even were this to occur however, this ascription is projected onto another entity without actually being an attribute of that identity. At no point does this second entity exhibit personhood by orienting itself to its environment through the concept. Only an self-ascription is a sound one; all else is projection which fails to adhere in the object.

First, sleeping people are people.

This is purely tautological. Sleeping humans are people is not nearly as evident an observation. I return your question to you, then, why is it the case that a sleeping human is a person?

Second, self concepts aren’t motivated. They don’t find motivation. Self concept is a product of mind. It is the mind that finds motivations, including motivations to protect the unborn.

By definition the mind is self-reflective consciousness, so you're attempting to draw a distinction which is unsound (and unintentionally rather conceding the point that the self concept is motivated).

Just as the sleeping tend to wake up, the unborn tend not to stay that way.

This does not get at my distinction in the least. While the unborn tend to grow up, I will never be unborn again though it is very likely I will sleep and wake up again many times before I die. The difference is not in the mere potential for a change in condition, but in the possibility of that change in condition applying to the perceiver who conceives of and applies personhood outwards.

It is the fact that we were all once unborn, coupled with natural drive to continue the species which causes the recognition of personhood, by many, in the unborn. This recognition manifests as disfavor for permissivism toward harming/killing unborn people. Reciprocal threat of harm is not necessary for this disfavor to persist as it is much the same with very young people, regardless of their state of wakefulness.

Natural selection motivates a protective instinct towards the unborn and offspring, but has always been conditioned by the practical consequences of attempting to have and raise offspring which the parents cannot support while still ensuring their own survival to reproduce later. Evolution is the very reason that abortion is and always has been a social practice among humans, so appealing there won't work.

The most common reason people are actually opposed to abortion is religious, owing to narratives which assert the sanctity of life. These narratives are motivated by many variables all of which have very little to do either with a serious consideration of self/personhood or reproduction itself (e.g. more children born and raised in the faith strengthens its domain, sanctity of life makes believers feel valued themselves in a meaningless and valueless universe, etc).

We refrain from harming sleeping people for much the same reasons that we refrain from harming awakened people. Not only because we will eventually sleep and awaken again and wish ourselves protected, but because conferring personhood onto another carries with it a moral duty granting a level of respect and dignity. We grant this to small children even though they are not able to reciprocate restraint from harm.

It is not necessary to regard a sleeping human as a person in order to confer protection on them, but it is necessary to do so with other self-conscious humans (including small children) if we wish to identify ourselves as persons too. This makes the one an act of preference and the other of necessity, which further differentiates what you would like to regard as interchangeable scenarios.

It is also conceivable that one could hold false beliefs about what a person is, and operate upon them. So the mere act of regarding any entity as a person does not necessarily entail that they are one. What your explanation does not do is get behind these beliefs and assess their validity.

Ones Self concept is not, and never has been a requisite for their personhood

The basis for this extreme claim is what, exactly?

Do you have enough integrity to admit that If Obama were President right now and had he committed just one tenth of the egregious errors that Trump's has to date

So name them.

that you and the entire Reich wing world would be out of your minds screaming for impeachment?

All we remember is that secret stash of cash sent to Iran in secret, behind Congress' back, the appointment of an open Communist to head the CIA, and the egregious acts by Obama's NSA to the point that a rabid liberal felt the need to blow the whistle and run away to Russia...

Imagine if that was Trump's record...it'd be game over...

How many more years will you use Obama

As long as leftists call people Nazis for doing things their messiah did for 8 years.

in your pointless efforts to mitigate Trumps misdeeds?

So show us the "misdeeds. Ya know. Evidence and shit.

Factology stole my theme. Give it back.*

2 points

@brontoraptor:

How many more years will you use Obama in your pointless efforts to mitigate Trumps misdeeds? Not that I believe for one second that Obama wasn't a good President, any sane person knows he was and particularly when you compare him to the disaster in the White House tonight. Oh wait it's a weekend, Trumps at one of his resorts.

Do you have enough integrity to admit that If Obama were President right now and had committed just one tenth of the egregious errors that Trump's has to date, that you and the entire Reich wing world would be out of your minds screaming for impeachment?

Of course you don't.

0 points

According to a disturbingly pleasant graphic from Information is Beautiful entitled simply 20th Century Death, communism was the leading ideological cause of death between 1900 and 2000. The 94 million that perished in China, the Soviet Union, North Korea, Afghanistan, and Eastern Europe easily (and tragically) trump the 28 million that died under fascist regimes during the same period.

During the century measured, more people died as a result of communism than from homicide (58 million) and genocide (30 million) put together. The combined death tolls of WWI (37 million) and WWII (66 million) exceed communism’s total by only 9 million.

Crazy AL I was wondering are you really CONFUSED ?????????????

0 points

According to a disturbingly pleasant graphic from Information is Beautiful entitled simply 20th Century Death, communism was the leading ideological cause of death between 1900 and 2000. The 94 million that perished in China, the Soviet Union, North Korea, Afghanistan, and Eastern Europe easily (and tragically) trump the 28 million that died under fascist regimes during the same period.

During the century measured, more people died as a result of communism than from homicide (58 million) and genocide (30 million) put together. The combined death tolls of WWI (37 million) and WWII (66 million) exceed communism’s total by only 9 million.

SUPER STUPID has Trump pulled off the genocide you COMMIES HAVE ?????????

1 point

Let's see the number of people killed under Communism !

According to a disturbingly pleasant graphic from Information is Beautiful entitled simply 20th Century Death, communism was the leading ideological cause of death between 1900 and 2000. The 94 million that perished in China, the Soviet Union, North Korea, Afghanistan, and Eastern Europe easily (and tragically) trump the 28 million that died under fascist regimes during the same period.

During the century measured, more people died as a result of communism than from homicide (58 million) and genocide (30 million) put together. The combined death tolls of WWI (37 million) and WWII (66 million) exceed communism’s total by only 9 million.

I am wondering about the Nirvana that Communism is

Fled with the 5, led through a European wooded ravine

And seen Stone henge connect and bring upon the Annunaki

The Highest kabbalah mystic chants by Elohim

And looks to the sky for prophecy

Was abducted in Nebraska

Then taken back to the laboratory, experiment performed before me

Non earthly alien autopsy!

Psycho social biological and electro-

-Magnetic manipulation of human consciousness

The Vulcan walks about the abyss!

I see what you're going for here. I have to admit it's poetic, but also exposes you at the same time. The way you write this is designed as a mockery of my raps, but you use no rhymes and make fun of how I write li-

-nes like this while rhyming. But the purpose of that is to show where the rhymes are when a part of a word rhymes but the rest doesn't. The fact that none of this rhymes yet you are making fun of how I write specifically to emphasize rhymes is indicative of you not comprehending my rhymes even when they are spelled out for you.

0 points

Does reparation be needed for you ?????????

Saturday marks 200 years since the birth of Karl Marx, and tributes are arising out around the globe. In a New York Times tribute headlined, “Happy Birthday, Karl Marx. You Were Right!” philosophy professor Jason Barker declared that “educated liberal opinion is today more or less unanimous in its agreement (with) Marx’s basic thesis” on the flaws of capitalism. But this is true only if “educated liberal opinion” simply does not care about tyranny.

But Marxism in practice didn’t work out so well. Communist regimes produced the greatest ideological carnage in human history, killing more than a hundred million people in the last century. While some apologists claim it is unfair to Marx to blame him, the seeds of tyranny were there from the start.

-1 points

SUPER STUPID what do you know about Marxism ???? I get your a BRAIN DEAD Idiot !

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/05/05/karl-marx-communism-death-column/578000002/

Saturday marks 200 years since the birth of Karl Marx, and tributes are arising out around the globe. In a New York Times tribute headlined, “Happy Birthday, Karl Marx. You Were Right!” philosophy professor Jason Barker declared that “educated liberal opinion is today more or less unanimous in its agreement (with) Marx’s basic thesis” on the flaws of capitalism. But this is true only if “educated liberal opinion” simply does not care about tyranny.

But Marxism in practice didn’t work out so well. Communist regimes produced the greatest ideological carnage in human history, killing more than a hundred million people in the last century. While some apologists claim it is unfair to Marx to blame him, the seeds of tyranny were there from the start.

Let's talk about what you do not know SUPER STUPID and that is a never ending cycle of STUPIDITY !

Poor little hillbilly Outlaw the grown man STILL CAN'T HANDLE HIS DRINK.

ROFLMAO.

0 points

Let's talk about what you do not know SUPER STUPID and that is a never ending cycle of STUPIDITY !

Rosenstein also indicated that unlike the other indictments and guilty pleas Mueller’s team has handed down so far, they don’t anticipate prosecuting any of the Russian intelligence officers anytime soon. Instead, the indictment will be handed off to the Justice Department’s National Security Division and its assistant attorney general John Demers to await a future prosecution on the slim chance any of the individuals wind up in US custody.

So tell me what Mueller has actually done SUPER STUPID !!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.wired.com/story/mueller-indictment-dnc-hack-russia-fancy-bear/

Thanks for the compliment. I really am.the type to be smart enough to pull that off

Just because you have the frame of a small feral child doesn't mean you are smart. Sorry to disappoint you.

even with sedating meds

So you admit that you need sedating meds to control your mental illness?

so I'd intentionally not escape

Wow. WHAT A SMART PLAN!!

0 points

Thanks for the compliment. I really am the type to be smart enough to pull that off even with sedating meds but I fear the aftermath would result in worse outcome so I'd intentionally not escape while knowing how.

Are you still going to pretend you're not nomenclature and hello?

Are you still going to pretend you didn't squeeze out the window and shimmy down the drainpipe of a secure psychiatric facility?

Mingiwuwu(673) Clarified
0 points

Are you still going to pretend you're not nomenclature and hellno?

I fall in love every other day. Usually lasts about 5-6 hours. Or until I masturbate.

0 points

Nomenclature speaks the truth. Oh no, sorry it's just his egomania at work.

2 points

He's in love with me... I don't think he'll ever get over it.

1 point

SUPER STUPID i am trying to remember what Hillary said about American Voters that could not push her across the finish line ? Do you have any memory of her words ??????

1 point

Now this punks the Socialist SUPER STUPID and it's PURE GOLD ! So let's have some fun with the Socialist and who they really are. You ready for the real world SUPER STUPID ?

Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez appeared in a video that was posted on Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-VT) Twitter account on Friday where she said that she was working to flip the seat "red."

"Hello everybody," Ocasio-Cortez began. "I'm so excited to be hopping on here, on Senator Sanders' account, and we're here in Kansas City to rally for Brent Welder."

Then Ocasio-Cortez made her gaffe.

"We're going to flip this seat red in November," Ocasio-Cortez said.

LMMFAO and you Socialist talk about Communism and a 28 year old DUMB SOCIALIST has outed your type.

1 point

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-concord/russian-company-charged-in-mueller-probe-seeks-grand-jury-materials-idUSKCN1IF2YW

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Russian company accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a propaganda operation to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election is asking a federal judge for access to secret information reviewed by a grand jury before it indicted the firm. In a court filing on Monday, lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting LLC said Mueller had wrongfully accused the company of a “make-believe crime,” in a political effort by the special counsel to “justify his own existence” by indicting “a Russian-any Russian.”

They asked the judge for approval to review the instructions provided to the grand jury, saying they believed the case was deficient because Mueller lacked requisite evidence to show the company knowingly and “willfully” violated American laws.

What happened here SUPER STUPID ??????????

1 point

SUPER STUPID you have any proof of a false claim ? Come on i am waiting

1 point

There is no collusion you DUMMY ! If there was it would have been shown at this point.

But let me ask a DUMMY what happen to the Concord Management case filed by Mueller ?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/05/09/concord-management-arraignment-russia-investigation/594454002/

Gave view point you BRAIN DEAD Idiot

1 point

Hello Poochyboy,

So, you thought I meant actually bowing, huh?? Oh you poor poor pathetic idiot. Now rollover.

excon

1 point

Mee theenks you protest too much... Clearly, your orange leader is bowing to HIS leader, the ex-KGB COMMUNIST.. If MY leader was doing that, I'd demonize HIM. But, you're not.. At SOME point, you're gonna have to address reality... Trump is BEHOLDEN to Putin.. It's OBVIOUS to everybody.. Not you, huh?

DUDE!

excon

SUPER STUPID who lacks any facts can you prove your statement and i quote you -Clearly, your orange leader is bowing to HIS leader, the ex-KGB COMMUNIST..

Got some pics to link up SUPER STUPID ?????????

1 point

Crazy AL the Socialist keep talking you have reached the stupidity of Hillary and that is a special feat right there.

1 point

Just as the decision to abort is left to the proximate parties, so too would the decision to kill the comatose reside with the proximate parties. This is because the selves most closely associated to those parties are the most invested to and affected by the decision.

Why didn't Mommy abort you ?????????????

1 point

Jace did your Mommy and Daddy have your view - There is no such thing as an unborn person. Self concept is requisite to personhood.

0 points

Lack of facts what RIGHT WINGERS are concerned about Marx ??????? If you SOCIALIST had two BRAIN CELLS to rub together you might be relevant but at this point in time you are IRRELEVANT

0 points

Putin hasn't changed a lick since he WAS a communist. Whatever "lipstick" you want to put on him, he's STILL the same man with the same objectives and he IS whatever he calls himself at any time. Right now he calls himself a "friend" of the present occupier of the White House …. who is COZYING UP to the "communistic leader" of an oligarchy that soooo closely resembles a communist KGB leader. Of course, he's also a conservative right winger …. birds of a feather ….

Crazy AL shows up on the scene speaking about Russia and Crazy AL the Socialist says Putin is a Conservative Right Winger !!!!!!!! Can you DUMMIES get any CRAZIER there AL ?????????

2 points

See, that's just like a stupid right winger, post a blatant lie with absolutely no hope of backing it up.

Lame

Conservanazi(618) Clarified
1 point

Your response presupposes you answered the question. Since when is self concept a requisite for personhood? My response will presuppose that it isn’t.

Your response presupposes that anybody gives a shit about your windbag shitposts. My response will presuppose that they don't.

Amarel(3129) Clarified
1 point

Your response presupposes you answered the question. Since when is self concept a requisite for personhood? My response will presuppose that it isn’t.

The difference between an unborn non-person and the sleeping non-person, is that our self-concept cannot find a self-motivated stake in protecting the unborn.

First, sleeping people are people.

Second, self concepts aren’t motivated. They don’t find motivation. Self concept is a product of mind. It is the mind that finds motivations, including motivations to protect the unborn.

None of us is ever going to become unborn again, but we generally do wake up.

Just as the sleeping tend to wake up, the unborn tend not to stay that way.

This creates a self-motivated impetus to disfavor permissivism towards harming/killing the sleeping non-person as the self desires security to be reconstituted when the body awakens.

It is the fact that we were all once unborn, coupled with natural drive to continue the species which causes the recognition of personhood, by many, in the unborn. This recognition manifests as disfavor for permissivism toward harming/killing unborn people. Reciprocal threat of harm is not necessary for this disfavor to persist as it is much the same with very young people, regardless of their state of wakefulness.

The practice of protecting a sleeping non-person is still very much contingent upon self concept and its connection to personhood in this case, but in a way that cannot apply to the unborn.

We refrain from harming sleeping people for much the same reasons that we refrain from harming awakened people. Not only because we will eventually sleep and awaken again and wish ourselves protected, but because conferring personhood onto another carries with it a moral duty granting a level of respect and dignity. We grant this to small children even though they are not able to reciprocate restraint from harm.

Ones Self concept is not, and never has been a requisite for their personhood

1 point

Putin hasn't changed a lick since he WAS a communist. Whatever "lipstick" you want to put on him, he's STILL the same man with the same objectives and he IS whatever he calls himself at any time. Right now he calls himself a "friend" of the present occupier of the White House …. who is COZYING UP to the "communistic leader" of an oligarchy that soooo closely resembles a communist KGB leader. Of course, he's also a conservative right winger …. birds of a feather ….

1 point

If they are going to be a lazy ass motherfucker to not crawl out of the womb without causing pain to their loyal mother then no they deserve to die ;)

1 point

This is the best machine I've ever owned. If you've been thinking about buying just one machine this might be what you're looking for. It's a full body zero impact workout.

but the Bible is

The Bible has been disproved dozens of times about its various claims. Most notably about how humanity began on Earth.

They have everything to do with Jesus Christ and His Christians, whom the world hates. Seriously, what is wrong with Jesus? Why hate Someone like that?

Strawman. I never said seeing Him in a dream is proof, but the Bible is. :)

YELLING does not change my mind, hun. He is going to rapture His church sfter the sixth seal is opened, and the Day of the Lord begins.

He has already proven that He is God in the Bible, my friend. Go read John 8, the whole thing, please. Peace.

John_C_1812(244) Clarified
1 point

they can be trick or willingly admit guilt to a felony crime and loose rights. Since you asked.

1 point

Just as the decision to abort is left to the proximate parties, so too would the decision to kill the comatose reside with the proximate parties. This is because the selves most closely associated to those parties are the most invested to and affected by the decision.

Jace(4655) Clarified
1 point

The difference between an unborn non-person and the sleeping non-person, is that our self-concept cannot find a self-motivated stake in protecting the unborn. None of us is ever going to become unborn again, but we generally do wake up. This creates a self-motivated impetus to disfavor permissivism towards harming/killing the sleeping non-person as the self desires security to be reconstituted when the body awakens. The practice of protecting a sleeping non-person is still very much contingent upon self concept and its connection to personhood in this case, but in a way that cannot apply to the unborn.

2 points

Had enough winning yet?

1 point

brontoraptor: Are you claiming that you aren't the beneficiary of any government programs?

I'm going to retire in a few years and I expect to get Social Security, Medicare and Medicade, programs I've paid into my entire life.

What a silly debate. Animals also crap on the ground. Should humans do that too?

1 point

So show us evidence of collusion. I'll take a fingerprint, a bloddy rag. Anything....

Hello bront:

Come on, man.. You wanna spoil the ending. You know I got nothing - today.. That's because the investigation hasn't ended yet. The ending comes at the END, not in the middle.. You can't MAKE it end in the middle, cause it's the MIDDLE and NOT the end.. Am I making sense???

excon

PS> Oy vey.. Poochyboy is gonna have a field day with this answer.

So let me get this straight you ridiculous dickhead...

You provide us a list of quotes from LITERALLY THE BIGGEST ANTI-COMMUNIST OF ALL TIME (i.e. Hitler)...

And use them to try to convince us that Hitler was a Communist?

Are you actually fucking retarded, bronto? Literally who falls for this shit? 70 years ago, THE VERY SAME PERSON (i.e. Hitler) was the one doing the VERY SAME JOB you are currently doing (i.e. spreading lies about Communism)

You act like Hitler and then try to use Hitler as a straw man argument against Communists? Just wtf, bronto? Just wtf???

1 point

1)Putin is actually in power ruling a country that isn't Communist, nor does he claim to be a Communist.

Hello bront:

Couple things.. Before Putin, Russia was a Communist dictatorship.. After the Soviet Union fell, Putin gave away the state assets to his buddies, and Russia became a Kleptocracy/Oligarchical dictatorship...

In the real world, NOTHING changed..

Words matter.. I've NEVER heard Bernie Sanders call himself a Communist.. If you have a link, I'll use it.. He DOES call himself a Democratic Socialist, but since you don't know what that means, you just call him a communist..

You KNOW I support universal healthcare.. You COULD call me a communist for doing so, and maybe you will.. I dunno how a committed capitalist and patriot like me could possibly be described as a communist.. But, you guys get a lotta stuff wrong.

excon

One thing you far lefties seem to forget is that the "elites" provide jobs. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Trump, Oprah... The list goes on. The ones who don't provide jobs consume and allow businesses to expand which also provides more jobs. Taking away what they have earned bc ppl are butthurt and lazy is dumb. And don't forget they get taxed out the ass. The job market changes every decade or so, you have to adapt to it.

0 points

Hello bront:

Yeah, that Whoopie.. . Her politics are like mine, but I'm much friendlier, and she's certainly LESS than tolerant. (But, whatabout when Bill O'Rielly cut off a libs mike and threw him off set?)

But, then Ben Shapiro chimed in and suggested that people like Whoopie and ME, think everybody on your side is EVIL.. I call BS. From your own experience of both ME and AL, have either of us EVER called you EVIL????? Do you think that WE think you're EVIL???

DUDE!

excon

You can sugar coat it however you want. The ONLY case in which I could even possibly agree with abortion is for a rape victim. It is the womans and her partners responsibility to make sure some form of contraceptive is used to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Denying the fact that what grows in a woman is a living being deserving of life simply because its convenient and removes responsibility is complete bull. The arrogance one must have to decide when a life is a life and when a life matters, when it has value and when it does not is incredible. The problem with people who don't believe in God or don't at least agree with the values of the bible is they will make any excuse to make any act acceptable. So sleep soundly knowing that planned parenthood is removing all those life sucking deadly "parasites" from all those women and thank your mother for not having you removed because you were inconvenient.

1)Putin is actually in power ruling a country that isn't Communist, nor does he claim to be a Communist. He might be a Communist, but he might simply be someone who worked in a prior nation that was Communist, not by his own choosing. It's conjecture. Similar to the Obama was raised in a Muslim country but isn't a Muslim thing...

2)Bernie Sanders and John Brennan don't deny what they are. They embrace it out in the open.

3)The most important thing. No evidence of collusion. Actually it is heavily the opposite.

Keep your eye on that ball Con. John Podesta, the head of the DNC's brother, just got immunity from Mueller...

Manafort has decades of ties to the establishment, and almost none to Trump. He was who the establishment wanted in that position. Hmmmm....then Trump axed him. Double hmmmm....

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/opinion-columns/wayne-allyn-root/commentary-the-real-russian-collusion-involved-hillary-clinton/amp/

Whatever works ;)

1 point

1)Russia hasn't been Communist in decades

Hello bront:

So, Putin ISN'T a Communist even though he was the head of Soviet Union spy agency, but people like Bernie Sanders are..

DUDE!

excon

If the Democrat Party wants to become a 4th Party, they should do what you say.

Sure. Let us hear it. I want the Trump Putin tape and the Iran Obama tape. Do you have either or both for us?

1 point

So, tell us. What did chicken evolve from? I bet you cant.

1 point

Thousands of years of observable evidence proves that eggs come from chickens. You cannot have an egg without a chicken. Duh

So show us evidence of collusion. I'll take a fingerprint, a bloddy rag. Anything....

Heaviest sanctions on Russia of any President.

Attacked Assad and Russia's military in Syria.

Defunded Iran, Russia's closest ally.

So what mythological reality are you looking at?

Newsfalsh.

1)Russia hasn't been Communist in decades.

2)We've seen zero evidence for collusion. Every "Russian connection" has ties to the Clinton Foundation, with zero exceptions. Including Manafort...

Wink wink wink wink...

Hint hint hint hint....

1 point

The Indians and early American settlers ate something called Pemican, which consisted of dehydrated raw red meat and rendered fat. People have actually eaten nothing but Pemicam for years and suffered no nutritional deficiencies and rarely got sick from eating it. It is the perfect food.

Get rid of them. I support racial unity........................................................................

1 point

Does that mean we can take your grandmother, who is in a coma, off of life support?

1 point

Well, you called them people, so yeah. They have that right. Why wouldn't they?

1 point

Isn't it neat that the neanderthals survived hundreds of thousands of years without government assistance or mass social programs?s social programs?

Hello bront:

Couple things.. You come from a tribal society.. Betcha ALL your tribes HAVE, and have always HAD, a CHIEF.. My BET is that when the tribe made a kill, it was shared EQUALLY amongst its members.. I wouldn't call that government assistance. I'd call it socialism..

Or are you gonna tell me that the Chief OWNED the kill and SOLD it to the members??? DUDE!

You've mentioned that you don't NEED the government handout that comes your way every month, but certainly SOME of your brothers need it, no? THAT, I would call government assistance..

excon

1 point

Marxist Critical Theory, being used by the left openly as we speak,

Hello again, bront:

The wiki article is interesting HISTORY.. But, MODERN MAINSTREAM leftists like me, don't subscribe to that Marxist Communist shit..

If we DID, you'd post a link..

Look.. Other than FOX News and Rush Limprod, I can't IMAGINE where you're getting that stuff.. Clearly, if what you're saying is true, our CANDIDATES for office would be SINGING the praises of Karl Marx.. And, they would be getting ELECTED having done so.

In the real world, NONE of that is happening.. NONE of it..

Step away from the FOX News.. It's rotting your brain.

excon

Your logic doesn't do much for Egalitarianism...

Isn't it neat that the neanderthals survived hundreds of thousands of years without government assistance or mass social programs? Maybe libs devolved...

Factmachine, factology, Conservanazi are all Nom. Anything else nom?

lol. Nom can't write bars like this.

1 point

Hello bront:

Yeah, I dunno what it means either..

excon

Factmachine, factology, Conservanazi are all Nom. Anything else nom?

Marxist Critical Theory, being used by the left openly as we speak, was literally invented in Nazi Germany...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory

1 point

Hello bront:

Mee theenks you protest too much... Clearly, your orange leader is bowing to HIS leader, the ex-KGB COMMUNIST.. If MY leader was doing that, I'd demonize HIM. But, you're not.. At SOME point, you're gonna have to address reality... Trump is BEHOLDEN to Putin.. It's OBVIOUS to everybody.. Not you, huh?

DUDE!

excon

Marxist Critical Theory, being used by the left openly as we speak, was literally invented in Nazi Germany...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory

I'm into TrumpAction. Words will never hurt me. Sticks and stones may break my bones.

1 point

Hello F:

Yes.. Your point??

We didn't BECOME modern man because of our physical strength.. We became modern man because of our brain...

Or, at least SOME of us did..

excon


1 of 8 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]