CreateDebate


The Public Waterfall RSS

Every argument gets a chance to be on top!
The Public Waterfall shows you all arguments, looking across every debate.
2 points

Gay Marriage: Make Believe Rights For Make Believe People

Yes. Gays are make believe and your delusional blathering is real and edgy. You definitely have that the right way around.

Trump could go down as the grratest President in our lifetimes.

Our economy is booming, our 401k plans exploding, ISIS losing their strongholds, tax cuts for the working man, illegal immigration down, Americans no longer forced to pay to kill unborn babies in other nations, etc. etc.

He might be the greatest thing that has happened to our naton. He is taking America back from the extremist Political Correct Left.

Killing someone in cold blood

You may have to define that too - is self-defense "[k]illing someone in cold blood"?

So asserting that it is makes it so?

No, but if you think it isn't, then there is a debate where you can make your case.

It shows my reasoning behind making the argument which can inform your opinion about whether it is reasonable.

So in comparison wth a Pimp and hooker, where does the testing and killing of viable Special Need's babies fall?

Hypocrites like you love judging others for their sins, whie completely ignoring your sins. It's truly dysfunctional to not see your own sins, but that is the world of self love and denial.

murder is illegal in the United states. While no the self-incriminating confession to murder is not illegal. Does that help clear you confusion.

No.

You can say you are going to Officially end life it is illegal as a threat not murder as said. If you make good on the promise to officially end life. That is murder.

Abortion isn't a person saying they want to terminate a pregnancy - it is the termination of that pregnancy.

Maybe that is where you keep getting confused.

gender specific amputation

Do I even want to know what you keep trying to talk about with this one?

Are you possibly using some translator that is butchering what you are trying to say? Is English not your first language? I'll try to work with you, but at some point your argument must make sense.

luckin(166) Clarified
1 point

A bit confused. Which idea were you referring to, murder or self-defense?

1 point

I want to start by distinguishing between races, which are broad categories applied to people based on phenotypes, and gene pools, which are specific groups of people who, by virtue of collocation and intramarriage, share genotypes.

The concept of race is generally misleading because it is based only on external traits (phenotypes), and is used to drive identity politics, societal division, and all manner of folly.

Gene pools, by contrast, differentiate people in different environments, generally in conjunction with natural selection and genetic drift, to broaden the diversity of capabilities of the human species.

For example the gene pool in northern Eurasia during the ice ages, developed through natural selection lighter skin that was better able to synthesize vitamin D with low levels of sunlight. This has enabled some humans to live healthy lives further away from the equator, and in cloudy environments like the Pacific Northwest and Great Britain.

1 point

I am not the one who "jumped out of the gates" with the declaration of formal academic superiority

Yes you are. I was under the impression that you were publicly admitting your lack of formal education, and this was the basis for your suggestion to TzarPepe that we should use public libraries instead (and also your later attacks against formal education). You responded by saying it was "ironic" because you were much more formally educated than I am. Are you memory impaired or something?

1 point

Oops! Double tap on the submission...................................Sorry.

Funny how the facts show that fewer people are getting married today. They are choosing to live together which is terrible for our children's security. The family unit is falling apart.

It's no fallacy!

luckin(166) Clarified
1 point

Then, since you used the term, what do you mean by murder?

Killing someone in cold blood

Sure, it is

So asserting that it is makes it so?

No it is not. It is a reasonable defense for gender specific amputation. This was an act of Civil War taken against the United States Constitution. As it was declared as threat and its demise the means to resolve a legal issue it gave direction to address.

Except the universe is far less complex than a creator of a universe.

Yes murder is illegal in the United states. While no the self-incriminating confession to murder is not illegal. Does that help clear you confusion. You can say you are going to Officially end life it is illegal as a threat not murder as said. If you make good on the promise to officially end life. That is murder.

This is very important to understand gender specific amputation is not abortion and there are other potential issues that should have been placed in a judicial Constitutional limit.

JustIgnoreMe(3056) Clarified
1 point

That depends on what you mean by murder

Then, since you used the term, what do you mean by murder?

Self-defense is not a reasonable argument for abortion

Sure, it is:

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Should mostabortionsbeconsideredselfdefense

1 point

You claim it is out of personal embarrassment. I claim it is pointless since this is the internet and I can make up any story I like.

I am not the one who "jumped out of the gates" with the declaration of formal academic superiority--nor did I claim that you were a "failure" in the academic system

stipulations to marriage

The stipulations should be consent of the participants and not harming those who have not consented.

So you are ok with a man having 30 wives if they find happiness and reassurance?

Sure; Or a woman with 30 husbands.

pandora's box

Slippery slope fallacy.

luckin(166) Clarified
1 point

That depends on what you mean by murder. Self-defense is not a reasonable argument for abortion

xMathFanx(857) Clarified
1 point

@Antrim

'' Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely''.

Philosophically, I disagree with this often invoked quote.

My contention holds that "Power allows one to be more of what they already are" (generally speaking, of course)

That is, if you are familiar with the story of Captain America:

Captain America before & after VS. Red-Skull before & after (tends to be my view, in outline)

1 point

So, to be clear--You claimed superior formal Educational background

Please stop capitalising random words. It's annoying.

though refuse to reveal it out of personal embarrassment(?)

You claim it is out of personal embarrassment. I claim it is pointless since this is the internet and I can make up any story I like.

Do you see the thing that all of your relies have in common? None of them ever address the point the other person made.

FromWithin(5710) Clarified
1 point

So you are ok with adults marrying consenting children if they find happiness and reassurance? If you say no, then you are making stipulations to marriage and who can participate in it.

So you are ok with a man having 30 wives if they find happiness and reassurance?

When we force all States to change their marriage laws based on the whims of people with unnatrual desires, we have opened pandora's box and have ushered in the breakdown in our family unit.... the bedrock of our society.

1 point

@marcusmoon

I don't allow just anybody to come into my house.

My company has standards for who they hire.

Harvard has EXTREMELY strict standards for who is accepted and allowed to attend classes.

I fail to see how it is not important to have standards that improve the quality of our country.

Why do you think the US catches so much grief for suggesting even a lower-level Merit type program when other countries already implement rather rigorous Merit-based immigration policies (and aren't "in the firing-line" for it)?

1 point

@Waylife

So, to be clear--You claimed superior formal Educational background though refuse to reveal it out of personal embarrassment(?)

Formal education trains someone to make an argument properly. Academics are qualified to speak in the authoritative, condescending style you like to use

If this were the case, following your reasoning, wouldn't this seem to suggest that I have had contact with Academic instruction & environment?

1 point

'' Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely''.

This quote by the British politician Lord Acton is true from Russia to Australia and from little old Northern Ireland to the mighty U.S.A.

Neither impartiality nor integrity exist in the murky world of double dealing politicians or the underground domain of the shady security agencies.

They all have their predetermined biased agendas, (usually left wing), and professional principles have no place.


2 of 41 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]